Jason J Saleem1, April Savoy2, Gale Etherton3, Jennifer Herout4. 1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA; Center for Ergonomics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. Electronic address: jason.saleem@louisville.edu. 2. Center for Health Information and Communication, Health Services Research and Development Service, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA. 4. Human Factors Engineering, Health Informatics, Office of Informatics and Analytics, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has deployed a large number of tablet computers in the last several years. However, little is known about how clinicians may use these devices with a newly planned Web-based electronic health record (EHR), as well as other clinical tools. The objective of this study was to understand the types of use that can be expected of tablet computers versus desktops. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 clinicians at a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Medical Center. RESULTS: An inductive qualitative analysis resulted in findings organized around recurrent themes of: (1) Barriers, (2) Facilitators, (3) Current Use, (4) Anticipated Use, (5) Patient Interaction, and (6) Connection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study generated several recommendations for the use of tablet computers with new health information technology tools being developed. Continuous connectivity for the mobile device is essential to avoid interruptions and clinician frustration. Also, making a physical keyboard available as an option for the tablet was a clear desire from the clinicians. Larger tablets (e.g., regular size iPad as compared to an iPad mini) were preferred. Being able to use secure messaging tools with the tablet computer was another consistent finding. Finally, more simplicity is needed for accessing patient data on mobile devices, while balancing the important need for adequate security. Published by Elsevier B.V.
OBJECTIVE: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has deployed a large number of tablet computers in the last several years. However, little is known about how clinicians may use these devices with a newly planned Web-based electronic health record (EHR), as well as other clinical tools. The objective of this study was to understand the types of use that can be expected of tablet computers versus desktops. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 clinicians at a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Medical Center. RESULTS: An inductive qualitative analysis resulted in findings organized around recurrent themes of: (1) Barriers, (2) Facilitators, (3) Current Use, (4) Anticipated Use, (5) Patient Interaction, and (6) Connection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study generated several recommendations for the use of tablet computers with new health information technology tools being developed. Continuous connectivity for the mobile device is essential to avoid interruptions and clinician frustration. Also, making a physical keyboard available as an option for the tablet was a clear desire from the clinicians. Larger tablets (e.g., regular size iPad as compared to an iPad mini) were preferred. Being able to use secure messaging tools with the tablet computer was another consistent finding. Finally, more simplicity is needed for accessing patient data on mobile devices, while balancing the important need for adequate security. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health information technology (HIT); Mobile computing; Tablet computers
Authors: Yaa A Kumah-Crystal; Claude J Pirtle; Harrison M Whyte; Edward S Goode; Shilo H Anders; Christoph U Lehmann Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Brett Armstrong; Daniel Habtemariam; Erica Husser; Douglas L Leslie; Marie Boltz; Yoojin Jung; Donna M Fick; Sharon K Inouye; Edward R Marcantonio; Long H Ngo Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2021-05-20
Authors: Oliver Maassen; Sebastian Fritsch; Julia Gantner; Saskia Deffge; Julian Kunze; Gernot Marx; Johannes Bickenbach Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 5.428