Jacob M Read1,2, Dustin T Weiler1,3, Tyler Satterly1,4,5, Catarina Soares1, Jason J Saleem1,2. 1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States. 2. Center for Ergonomics, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States. 3. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States. 4. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, United States. 5. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of the electronic health record (EHR) has had a significant impact on provider-patient interactions, particularly revolving around patient-centeredness. More research is needed to understand the provider perspective of this interaction. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to obtain provider feedback on a new exam room design compared with the one already in use with respect to the computing layout, which included a wall-mounted monitor for ease of (re)-positioning. An additional objective was to understand elements of exam room design and computing that were highly valued. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 28 providers from several health care organizations. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for analysis. We used an inductive coding approach to abstract recurrent themes from the data. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed several themes organized around exam room layout, exam room computing, and provider workflow. We report frequency of occurrence of the coded data for computer accessories, computing usefulness, computer mobility, documentation habits, form factor, layout preference, patient interaction, screen sharing, and work habits. CONCLUSION: Providers in our study preferred exam room design to promote flexibility, mobility, and body orientation directed toward the patient. Providers also expressed the need for exam room design to support varying work habits and preferences, including whether to share the computer screen or not. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: The introduction of the electronic health record (EHR) has had a significant impact on provider-patient interactions, particularly revolving around patient-centeredness. More research is needed to understand the provider perspective of this interaction. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to obtain provider feedback on a new exam room design compared with the one already in use with respect to the computing layout, which included a wall-mounted monitor for ease of (re)-positioning. An additional objective was to understand elements of exam room design and computing that were highly valued. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 28 providers from several health care organizations. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for analysis. We used an inductive coding approach to abstract recurrent themes from the data. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed several themes organized around exam room layout, exam room computing, and provider workflow. We report frequency of occurrence of the coded data for computer accessories, computing usefulness, computer mobility, documentation habits, form factor, layout preference, patient interaction, screen sharing, and work habits. CONCLUSION: Providers in our study preferred exam room design to promote flexibility, mobility, and body orientation directed toward the patient. Providers also expressed the need for exam room design to support varying work habits and preferences, including whether to share the computer screen or not. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Ruth A Perrin; Steven Rappaport; Joanne M Stevens; John G Demakis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-06-07 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jason J Saleem; Mindy E Flanagan; Alissa L Russ; Carmit K McMullen; Leora Elli; Scott A Russell; Katelyn J Bennett; Marianne S Matthias; Shakaib U Rehman; Mark D Schwartz; Richard M Frankel Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: William Ventres; Sarah Kooienga; Nancy Vuckovic; Ryan Marlin; Peggy Nygren; Valerie Stewart Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Christopher Pearce; Michael Arnold; Christine Phillips; Stephen Trumble; Kathryn Dwan Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jason J Saleem; Dustin T Weiler; Tyler Satterly; Maury A Nussbaum; Neale R Chumbler; Gary M Fischer; Shakaib U Rehman Journal: Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet Date: 2018-09-25
Authors: Dustin T Weiler; Tyler Satterly; Shakaib U Rehman; Maury A Nussbaum; Neale R Chumbler; Gary M Fischer; Jason J Saleem Journal: IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors Date: 2018-06-08