Literature DB >> 35609171

Case Report of Novel, Automatic Shocking Vector Adjustment Algorithm: A Life-Saving Feature of a Modern Defibrillator.

Mark R Heckle1, Sunil K Jha1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failed delivery of appropriate shocks against fatal dysrhythmias can be the result of low impedance on high-voltage leads. This malfunction might be missed on routine interrogation. We describe the case of a 66-year-old man with a high-voltage lead short circuit who was successfully rescued with the use of an overcurrent detection and automatic shocking vector adjustment algorithm. CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old man with severe nonischemic cardiomyopathy was admitted after receiving 2 shocks from his cardiac resynchronization therapy cardioverter-defibrillator. Interrogation of his defibrillator confirmed 2 consecutive episodes of ventricular fibrillation. For each episode, the initial shock therapy was aborted due to low impedance (<10 ohms) detected on the default shocking configuration: right ventricle to superior vena cava/implantable cardioverter generator. As a result, the device algorithm excluded the superior vena cava coil and immediately delivered a shock of 40 joules between the right ventricular coil and the cardiac resynchronization therapy cardioverter-defibrillator implantable cardioverter generator. This successfully terminated the ventricular fibrillation. All other lead measurements were normal.
CONCLUSION: High-voltage lead malfunctions can lead to failed therapy of life-threatening dysrhythmias. Malfunctions like a low impedance of high-voltage leads may not be detected on routine interrogation. Fortunately, the overcurrent detection algorithm recognized the low impedance, and another shocking configuration was selected and successfully terminated the ventricular dysrhythmias. With these algorithms, overcurrent detection and automatic shocking vector adjustment, this patient was rescued. We suggest this feature be considered in all modern defibrillators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35609171      PMCID: PMC9126534          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/21.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  4 in total

1.  Unrecognized failure of a narrow caliber defibrillation lead: the role of defibrillation threshold testing in identifying an unprotected individual.

Authors:  Darryl P Leong; Lieselot van Erven
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 2.  Monitoring for and Diagnosis of Lead Dysfunction.

Authors:  Sandeep G Nair; Charles D Swerdlow
Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Clin       Date:  2018-12

3.  Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of >10 years.

Authors:  Thomas Kleemann; Torsten Becker; Klaus Doenges; Margit Vater; Jochen Senges; Steffen Schneider; Werner Saggau; Udo Weisse; Karlheinz Seidl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Successful detection of a high-energy electrical short circuit and a "rescue" shock using a novel automatic shocking-vector adjustment algorithm.

Authors:  Masahiro Mizobuchi; Yoshihisa Enjoji
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.