| Literature DB >> 35607441 |
Lihong Lan1, Xiaozheng Zhu1, Bili Ye1, Huizhen Jiang1, Yuntao Huang1.
Abstract
Objective: This study is aimed at analyzing the effects of individualized nursing based on the zero-defect theory on perioperative patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35607441 PMCID: PMC9124088 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5086350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.464
Comparison of general data between two groups of patients.
| Group | Control group ( | Observation group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (M/F, number of cases) | 49/38 | 45/42 | 0.3702 | 0.5429 |
| Age ( | 49.37 ± 6.15 | 50.26 ± 5.34 | 1.0192 | 0.3095 |
| Types of disease (number of cases) | 1.2433 | 0.5371 | ||
| Cholelithiasis | 56 | 59 | ||
| Cholecystitis | 22 | 23 | ||
| Gallbladder polyps | 9 | 5 |
Comparison of psychological stress response between two groups of patients ().
| Group | Heart rate (times/min) | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | |
| Control group ( | 88.42 ± 9.34 | 80.34 ± 5.27∗ | 83.44 ± 5.65 | 75.13 ± 3.12∗ | 136.62 ± 9.97 | 124.36 ± 5.33∗ |
| Observation group ( | 87.62 ± 8.18 | 70.16 ± 3.75∗ | 83.71 ± 6.12 | 70.36 ± 2.14∗ | 136.18 ± 8.39 | 116.41 ± 4.28∗ |
|
| 0.6010 | 14.6803 | 0.3024 | 11.7597 | 0.3150 | 10.8478 |
|
| 0.5486 | <0.001 | 0.7627 | <0.001 | 0.7532 | <0.001 |
Note: compared with before nursing, ∗P < 0.05.
Comparison of psychological changes between two groups of patients before and after nursing intervention (, points).
| Group | SDS | SAS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | After nursing |
|
| Before nursing | After nursing |
|
| |
| Control group ( | 63.48 ± 3.74 | 47.88 ± 2.83 | 31.0247 | <0.001 | 64.24 ± 5.22 | 49.37 ± 4.51 | 20.1057 | <0.0010 |
| Observation group ( | 63.76 ± 3.82 | 40.17 ± 2.53 | 48.0228 | <0.001 | 64.89 ± 5.06 | 43.55 ± 3.28 | 33.0088 | <0.000 |
|
| 0.4885 | 18.9446 | 0.8340 | 9.7345 | ||||
|
| 0.6258 | <0.001 | 0.4055 | <0.001 | ||||
Figure 1Comparison of SDS and SAS scores before and after intervention between the two groups. The depression and anxiety scores of the two groups after nursing were decreased than those before nursing; the decline in the observation group was critically much more than that in the control group, with a difference in statistical significance (P < 0.05). Note: compare with before nursing care, ∗P < 0.05; compare with the control group, #P < 0.05.
Comparison of postoperative rehabilitation efficacy between the two groups (, h).
| Group | First postoperative exhaust time | Normal intake time | Out-of-bed activity time | Hospital stay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 36.56 ± 7.24 | 39.67 ± 9.44 | 63.66 ± 8.38 | 136.37 ± 17.52 |
| Observation group ( | 15.73 ± 5.26 | 23.36 ± 3.31 | 31.72 ± 5.25 | 83.18 ± 11.39 |
|
| 21.7106 | 15.2077 | 30.1269 | 12.7414 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups (cases (%)).
| Group | Nausea | Infection of incisional wound | Shoulder and back pain | Total incidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 5 (5.75) | 3 (3.44) | 5 (5.75) | 13 (14.94) |
| Observation group ( | 2 (2.30) | 0 (0) | 3 (3.45) | 5 (5.75) |
|
| — | — | — | 3.9658 |
|
| — | — | — | 0.0464 |
Comparison of two groups' satisfaction with nursing care (cases (%)).
| Group | Very satisfied | Satisfied | Unsatisfied | Satisfaction rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 39 (44.83) | 30 (34.48) | 18 (20.69) | 69 (79.31) |
| Observation group ( | 65 (74.71) | 17 (19.54) | 5 (5.75) | 82 (94.25) |
|
| — | — | — | 8.4670 |
|
| — | — | — | 0.0036 |