Literature DB >> 31879089

Nationwide trends in the use of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Andrew F Sabour1, Kazuhide Matsushima2, Bryan E Love1, Evan T Alicuben1, Morgan A Schellenberg1, Kenji Inaba1, Demetrios Demetriades1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subtotal cholecystectomy is a viable alternative approach to the proverbial "difficult" gallbladder. To date, only a few studies have observed the establishment of those bail-out procedures as an increasingly common surgical practice. The purpose of this study is to assess nationwide trends of subtotal cholecystectomy through evaluation of operative variables and patient- and institution-level characteristics in procedure preference.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample for the years between 2003 and 2014. Patients with acute cholecystitis were categorized based on the ninth revision International Classification of Disease Clinical Modification procedure codes for open total, laparoscopic total, open subtotal, or laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. Any patient younger than 18 years of age or with a preoperative stay >1 week was excluded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate significant patient- and institution-level characteristics associated with the performance of subtotal cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: A total of 290,855 patients were evaluated. During the study period, the rate of open and laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy sharply increased (0.10% of all cholecystectomy procedures to 0.52% and 0.12% to 0.28%, respectively). The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open total cholecystectomy decreased from 10.5% to 7.6%. Subtotal cholecystectomies were performed at significantly higher rates in men (odds ratio: 1.95, P < .001), Asian Americans (odds ratio: 2.21, P = .037), and patients with alcohol abuse (odds ratio: 2.23, P < .001). Teaching hospitals (odds ratio: 2.41, P < .001) and those in rural areas (odds ratio: 2.26, P < .001) were more likely to perform subtotal cholecystectomies.
CONCLUSION: Growing trends in the use of subtotal cholecystectomy suggest evolving surgical practices for acute cholecystitis. Our data suggests that several patient- and hospital-level characteristics might play a deciding role in procedure preference.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31879089     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  9 in total

1.  Early Outcomes of Subtotal vs Total Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Caitlyn Braschi; Christine Tung; Annie Tang; Cynthia Delgado; Lisandra Uribe; Lara Senekjian; Jessica A Keeley
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 16.681

2.  Cholecystectomy: Advances and Issues.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Laparoscopic bailout surgery effective procedure for patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Mitsugi Shimoda; Yu Kuboyama; Shuji Suzuki
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-03-10

4.  Patient and surgeon factors contributing to bailout cholecystectomies: a single-institutional retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Miya C Yoshida; Takuya Ogami; Kaylee Ho; Eileen X Bui; Shahenda Khedr; Chun-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Effects of Individualized Nursing Based on Zero-Defect Theory on Perioperative Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Lihong Lan; Xiaozheng Zhu; Bili Ye; Huizhen Jiang; Yuntao Huang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Does preoperative MRCP imaging predict risk for conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  Atsushi Kohga; Kenji Suzuki; Takuya Okumura; Kimihiro Yamashita; Jun Isogaki; Akihiro Kawabe; Taizo Kimura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Endoscopic plastic stent therapy for bile leaks following total vs subtotal cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Patrick Yachimski; Jordan K Orr; Anthony Gamboa
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-11-27

8.  Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ali Cihat Yildirim; Sezgin Zeren; Mehmet Fatih Ekici; Faik Yaylak; Mustafa Cem Algin; Ozlem Arik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-21

9.  Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques.

Authors:  Jonathan G A Koo; Yiong Huak Chan; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.