Literature DB >> 27763898

The Critical View of Safety: Why It Is Not the Only Method of Ductal Identification Within the Standard of Care in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Steven M Strasberg1, L Michael Brunt.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 27763898     DOI： 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN： 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shanley B Deal; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Dana Telem; Robert D Fanelli; Marian McDonald; Michael Ujiki; L Michael Brunt; Adnan A Alseidi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative analysis of reliability and clinical effects of the critical view of safety approach used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Şeref Selçuk Kılıç; Önder Özden; Selcan Türker Çolak
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Routine near infra-red indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography versus intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-matched comparison.

Authors:  Silvia Quaresima; Andrea Balla; Livia Palmieri; Ardit Seitaj; Abe Fingerhut; Pietro Ursi; Alessandro M Paganini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ten-year Audit of Safe Bail-Out Alternatives to the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Dimitrios Papageorgiou; Maria-Ioanna Antonopoulou; Nikolaos Stamos; Christos Agalianos; Nikolaos Ivros; Demetrios Davides; Georgios Pechlivanides; Ioannis Kyriazanos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Is fundus first laparoscopic cholecystectomy a better option than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult cholecystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahım Umar Garzali; Anas Aburumman; Yousef Alsardia; Belal Alabdallat; Saad Wraikat; Ali Aloun
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-07

6.  The unwanted third wheel in the Calot's triangle: Incidence and surgical significance of caterpillar hump of right hepatic artery with a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luigi Marano; Alberto Bartoli; Karol Polom; Raffaele Bellochi; Alessandro Spaziani; Giampaolo Castagnoli
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 7.  Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Vishal Gupta; Gaurav Jain
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-27

8.  Recommendation for Photographic Documentation of Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Maciej Sebastian; Agata Sebastian; Jerzy Rudnicki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study.

Authors:  Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella; Angela Gurrado; Alessandro Pasculli; Nicola de Angelis; Riccardo Memeo; Francesco Paolo Prete; Stefano Berti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Marco Rigamonti; Francesco Giuseppe Aldo Badessi; Nicola Solari; Marco Milone; Fausto Catena; Stefano Scabini; Francesco Vittore; Gennaro Perrone; Carlo de Werra; Ferdinando Cafiero; Mario Testini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; L Michael Brunt; Neil Davies; Ali Linsk; Amani Munshi; H Alejandro Rodriguez; Abe Fingerhut; Robert D Fanelli; Horacio Asbun; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.