Literature DB >> 35606514

The supply and demand of news during COVID-19 and assessment of questionable sources production.

Pietro Gravino1, Giulio Prevedello2, Martina Galletti2, Vittorio Loreto2,3,4.   

Abstract

Misinformation threatens our societies, but little is known about how the production of news by unreliable sources relates to supply and demand dynamics. We exploit the burst of news production triggered by the COVID-19 outbreak through an Italian database partially annotated for questionable sources. We compare news supply with news demand, as captured by Google Trends data. We identify the Granger causal relationships between supply and demand for the most searched keywords, quantifying the inertial behaviour of the news supply. Focusing on COVID-19 news, we find that questionable sources are more sensitive than general news production to people's interests, especially when news supply and demand mismatched. We introduce an index assessing the level of questionable news production solely based on the available volumes of news and searches. We contend that these results can be a powerful asset in informing campaigns against disinformation and providing news outlets and institutions with potentially relevant strategies.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35606514     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01353-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  12 in total

1.  A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet.

Authors:  Anna Kata
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Is cannabis an illicit drug or a medicine? A quantitative framing analysis of Israeli newspaper coverage.

Authors:  Sharon R Sznitman; Nehama Lewis
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 3.  The Psychology of Fake News.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; David G Rand
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Authors:  Nir Grinberg; Kenneth Joseph; Lisa Friedland; Briony Swire-Thompson; David Lazer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The science of fake news.

Authors:  David M J Lazer; Matthew A Baum; Yochai Benkler; Adam J Berinsky; Kelly M Greenhill; Filippo Menczer; Miriam J Metzger; Brendan Nyhan; Gordon Pennycook; David Rothschild; Michael Schudson; Steven A Sloman; Cass R Sunstein; Emily A Thorson; Duncan J Watts; Jonathan L Zittrain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The second worldwide wave of interest in coronavirus since the COVID-19 outbreaks in South Korea, Italy and Iran: A Google Trends study.

Authors:  Artur Strzelecki
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 7.217

7.  Dynamics of online hate and misinformation.

Authors:  Matteo Cinelli; Andraž Pelicon; Igor Mozetič; Walter Quattrociocchi; Petra Kralj Novak; Fabiana Zollo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends.

Authors:  Tobias Preis; Helen Susannah Moat; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Influenza forecasting with Google Flu Trends.

Authors:  Andrea Freyer Dugas; Mehdi Jalalpour; Yulia Gel; Scott Levin; Fred Torcaso; Takeru Igusa; Richard E Rothman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  COVID-19-Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis.

Authors:  Md Saiful Islam; Tonmoy Sarkar; Sazzad Hossain Khan; Abu-Hena Mostofa Kamal; S M Murshid Hasan; Alamgir Kabir; Dalia Yeasmin; Mohammad Ariful Islam; Kamal Ibne Amin Chowdhury; Kazi Selim Anwar; Abrar Ahmad Chughtai; Holly Seale
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.707

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.