Literature DB >> 30679368

Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Nir Grinberg1,2, Kenneth Joseph3, Lisa Friedland1, Briony Swire-Thompson1,2, David Lazer4,2.   

Abstract

The spread of fake news on social media became a public concern in the United States after the 2016 presidential election. We examined exposure to and sharing of fake news by registered voters on Twitter and found that engagement with fake news sources was extremely concentrated. Only 1% of individuals accounted for 80% of fake news source exposures, and 0.1% accounted for nearly 80% of fake news sources shared. Individuals most likely to engage with fake news sources were conservative leaning, older, and highly engaged with political news. A cluster of fake news sources shared overlapping audiences on the extreme right, but for people across the political spectrum, most political news exposure still came from mainstream media outlets.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30679368     DOI: 10.1126/science.aau2706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  82 in total

1.  Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lyons; Jacob M Montgomery; Andrew M Guess; Brendan Nyhan; Jason Reifler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools.

Authors:  Anastasia Kozyreva; Stephan Lewandowsky; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2020-12

3.  Factors influencing fake news rebuttal acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the moderating effect of cognitive ability.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Fan Chao; Guang Yu; Kaihang Zhang
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Eliciting preferences for truth-telling in a survey of politicians.

Authors:  Katharina A Janezic; Aina Gallego
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Aging in an Era of Fake News.

Authors:  Nadia M Brashier; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-05-19

6.  Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter.

Authors:  Philipp Wicke; Marianna M Bolognesi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Does Quality of Life Act as a Protective Factor against Believing Health Rumors? Evidence from a National Cross-Sectional Survey in China.

Authors:  Haixia Wang; Xiqian Zou; Kaisheng Lai; Weiping Luo; Lingnan He
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.

Authors:  Sander van der Linden
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Brandon K N Sze; Matthew Andreotta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Conservatives' susceptibility to political misperceptions.

Authors:  R Kelly Garrett; Robert M Bond
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.