Literature DB >> 33736957

The Psychology of Fake News.

Gordon Pennycook1, David G Rand2.   

Abstract

We synthesize a burgeoning literature investigating why people believe and share false or highly misleading news online. Contrary to a common narrative whereby politics drives susceptibility to fake news, people are 'better' at discerning truth from falsehood (despite greater overall belief) when evaluating politically concordant news. Instead, poor truth discernment is associated with lack of careful reasoning and relevant knowledge, and the use of heuristics such as familiarity. Furthermore, there is a substantial disconnect between what people believe and what they share on social media. This dissociation is largely driven by inattention, more so than by purposeful sharing of misinformation. Thus, interventions can successfully nudge social media users to focus more on accuracy. Crowdsourced veracity ratings can also be leveraged to improve social media ranking algorithms.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; crowdsourcing; dual process theory; fake news; information sharing; misinformation; motivated reasoning; news media; social media

Year:  2021        PMID: 33736957     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  31 in total

1.  Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Aviva Philipp-Muller; Spike W S Lee; Richard E Petty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  The supply and demand of news during COVID-19 and assessment of questionable sources production.

Authors:  Pietro Gravino; Giulio Prevedello; Martina Galletti; Vittorio Loreto
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Combating Misinformation by Sharing the Truth: a Study on the Spread of Fact-Checks on Social Media.

Authors:  Jiexun Li; Xiaohui Chang
Journal:  Inf Syst Front       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 5.261

4.  Who Will Help to Strive Against the "Infodemic"? Reciprocity Norms Enforce the Information Sharing Accuracy of the Individuals.

Authors:  Kehan Li; Weiwei Xiao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-30

5.  Cognitive Processes and Personality Traits Underlying Four Phenotypes of Susceptibility to (Mis)Information.

Authors:  Michal Piksa; Karolina Noworyta; Jan Piasecki; Pawel Gwiazdzinski; Aleksander B Gundersen; Jonas Kunst; Rafal Rygula
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 6.  Online Medical Misinformation in Cancer: Distinguishing Fact From Fiction.

Authors:  Eleonora Teplinsky; Sara Beltrán Ponce; Emily K Drake; Ann Meredith Garcia; Stacy Loeb; G J van Londen; Deanna Teoh; Michael Thompson; Lidia Schapira
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-31

7.  "In Flow"! Why Do Users Share Fake News about Environmentally Friendly Brands on Social Media?

Authors:  Daniel-Rareș Obadă; Dan-Cristian Dabija
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds.

Authors:  Matthew Groh; Ziv Epstein; Chaz Firestone; Rosalind Picard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Scaling up fact-checking using the wisdom of crowds.

Authors:  Jennifer Allen; Antonio A Arechar; Gordon Pennycook; David G Rand
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Stereotyping of the Russian Orthodox Church in Fake News in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Semiotic and Legal Analysis.

Authors:  Yulia Erokhina
Journal:  Int J Semiot Law       Date:  2022-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.