| Literature DB >> 35605453 |
Aranzazu M de Marañón1, Pedro Díaz-Pozo1, Francisco Canet1, Noelia Díaz-Morales1, Zaida Abad-Jiménez1, Sandra López-Domènech1, Teresa Vezza1, Nadezda Apostolova2, Carlos Morillas1, Milagros Rocha3, Víctor M Víctor4.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease that affects mitochondrial function. In this context, the rescue mechanisms of mitochondrial health, such as mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis, are of crucial importance. The gold standard for the treatment of type 2 diabetes is metformin, which has a beneficial impact on the mitochondrial metabolism. In this study, we set out to describe the effect of metformin treatment on mitochondrial function and mitophagy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from type 2 diabetic patients. We performed a preliminary cross-sectional observational study complying with CONSORT requirements, for which we recruited 242 subjects, divided into 101 healthy volunteers, 93 metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients and 48 non-metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients. Mitochondria from the type 2 diabetic patients not treated with metformin displayed more reactive oxygen species (ROS) than those from healthy or metformin-treated subjects. Protein expression of the electron transport chain (ETC) complexes was lower in PBMCs from type 2 diabetic patients without metformin treatment than in those from the other two groups. Mitophagy was altered in type 2 diabetic patients, evident in a decrease in the protein levels of PINK1 and Parkin in parallel to that of the mitochondrial biogenesis protein PGC1α, both of which effects were reversed by metformin. Analysis of AMPK phosphorylation revealed that its activation was decreased in the PBMCs of type 2 diabetic patients, an effect which was reversed, once again, by metformin. In addition, there was an increase in the serum levels of TNFα and IL-6 in type 2 diabetic patients and this was reversed with metformin treatment. These results demonstrate that metformin improves mitochondrial function, restores the levels of ETC complexes, and enhances AMPK activation and mitophagy, suggesting beneficial clinical implications in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Metformin; Mitochondria; Mitophagy; Type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35605453 PMCID: PMC9124713 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Redox Biol ISSN: 2213-2317 Impact factor: 10.787
Anthropometric and biochemical parameters of control subjects and type 2 diabetic patients treated or not with metformin.
| Control | T2D | T2D-metformin | Age and BMI-corrected | HbA1c% corrected | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 101 | 48 | 93 | ||
| Male% | 45 | 47.92 | 55 | ||
| Age (years) | 45 ± 10 | 60 ± 11* | 60 ± 9* | – | |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 24.83 ± 4.42 | 29.59 ± 5.31* | 29.70 ± 4.62* | – | |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 82.69 ± 13.49 | 100.34 ± 13.06* | 102.38 ± 11.21* | * | * |
| Waist-Hip index | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 0.93 ± 0.08* | 0.96 ± 0.07* | * | * |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 122 ± 20.33 | 142.74 ± 20.61* | 139.16 ± 14.59* | * | * |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 74.54 ± 12.07 | 81.58 ± 11.75* | 79.33 ± 9.82* | * | * |
| Insulin (μUI/mL) | 7.42 ± 5.18 | 16.58 ± 9.37* | 16.37 ± 12.11* | * | * |
| HOMA-IR | 1.67 ± 1.28 | 5.56 ± 4.06* | 5.27 ± 4.25* | * | * |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.27 ± 0.30 | 7.16 ± 1.56* | 6.66 ± 0.69#* | * | – |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 89.60 ± 10.71 | 135.48 ± 40.53* | 131.40 ± 32.87* | * | * |
| cholesterol (mg/dL) | 194.28 ± 34.77 | 175.43 ± 39.77* | 168.21 ± 38.56* | * | * |
| HDL(mg/dL) | 56.15 ± 14.11 | 46.73 ± 12.81* | 44.34 ± 10.59* | * | * |
| LDL(mg/dL) | 118.30 ± 28.78 | 104.38 ± 33.53* | 97.06 ± 33.54* | * | * |
| VLDL(mg/dL) | 14.5 (11.75–23) | 20.5 (15–30)* | 24 (18–33.75)* | * | * |
| CT/HDL | 3.44 ± 1.02 | 3.98 ± 1.19 | 3.94 ± 1.12 | * | * |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 73 (58.5–116) | 102 (76–150)* | 127 (92–169.83)* | * | * |
| Non-HDL Cholesterol | 138.12 ± 33.64 | 129.67 ± 36.66 | 123.86 ± 37.38* | * | * |
Mean±standard deviations are shown in the table for normally distributed data, while the median and the 25th and 75th quartiles are displayed for non-normally distributed data. Comparisons between groups were made with ANOVA and the Tukey post-test. Non-normally distributed data were compared with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The influence of age, BMI and HbA1c was tested and corrected with the multivariate linear model correction. *p < 0.05 vs control and †p < 0.05 vs type 2 diabetes.
Fig. 1Protein expression of ETC complexes and mitochondrial ROS production in type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects. (A–F). Bar graphs show measurements of the ETC complexes relativized to VDAC protein levels and to an internal control. Representative WB images are shown. Quantification was performed with at least 20 samples for each group. G) Bar graph showing the median intensity of fluorescence of MitoSOX, relative to the levels of the internal control, assessed by flow cytometry. H) Representative histogram displaying the three spectra of the analysed groups. Orange histogram represents healthy subjects, blue are type 2 diabetes patients, and red represent type 2 diabetes patients + metformin. Values represent mean ± SEM. Comparisons were made with ANOVA and a Tukey post-hoc test. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs Control; #p < 0.05 and ###p < 0.001 vs type 2 diabetes. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Protein levels of mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis-related proteins in PBMCs from type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects. Protein levels relative to the actin signal of the mitophagy proteins PINK1 (A), Parkin (B), NBR1 (C) and BNIP3L/NIX (D) are shown. Mitochondrial biogenesis-related proteins mTFA and PGC1α are shown in plots E and F, respectively. P-AMPK total and relative levels are displayed in blots G and H. Representative images of the WB experiments are shown for each assessed protein. Values in the bar charts represent mean ± SEM. Quantification was performed using at least 20 samples for each group. Comparisons were made with ANOVA and a Tukey post-hoc test. *p < 0.05 vs Control; #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs type 2 diabetes.
Fig. 3Morphological analysis of mitochondria isolated from PBMCs from type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects. TEM images were analysed with ImageJ. Area (A), perimeter (B), circularity (C), aspect ratio (D) and roundness (E) were measured in at least 100 mitochondria for each group. (F) Representative images are shown below the bars. Arrows point to mitochondria characteristic of each group. Values in the bar graphs represent the mean ± SEM. Comparisons were made with ANOVA and a Tukey post-hoc test. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001 vs Control; ###p < 0.001 vs type 2 diabetes.
Fig. 4Serum levels of TNFα (A) and IL-6 (B) measured with a Luminex® 200 analyzer system following the Milliplex® MAP Kit manufacturer's procedure. Comparisons were made with ANOVA and a Tukey post-hoc test. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001 vs Control; #p < 0.05 vs type 2 diabetes.