| Literature DB >> 35601455 |
Michael J Roast1, Justin R Eastwood1, Nataly Hidalgo Aranzamendi1, Marie Fan1, Niki Teunissen1, Simon Verhulst2, Anne Peters1.
Abstract
Telomere length (TL) shortens with age but telomere dynamics can relate to fitness components independent of age. Immune function often relates to such fitness components and can also interact with telomeres. Studying the link between TL and immune function may therefore help us understand telomere-fitness associations. We assessed the relationships between erythrocyte TL and four immune indices (haptoglobin, natural antibodies (NAbs), complement activity (CA) and heterophil-lymphocyte (HL) ratio; n = 477-589), from known-aged individuals of a wild passerine (Malurus coronatus). As expected, we find that TL significantly declined with age. To verify whether associations between TL and immune function were independent of parallel age-related changes (e.g. immunosenescence), we statistically controlled for sampling age and used within-subject centring of TL to separate relationships within or between individuals. We found that TL positively predicted CA at the between-individual level (individuals with longer average TL had higher CA), but no other immune indices. By contrast, age predicted the levels of NAbs and HL ratio, allowing inference that respective associations between TL and age with immune indices are independent. Any links existing between TL and fitness are therefore unlikely to be strongly mediated by innate immune function, while TL and immune indices appear independent expressions of individual heterogeneity.Entities:
Keywords: ageing; avian; constitutive; immune; quality; senescence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35601455 PMCID: PMC9043702 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.212012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 3.653
Figure 1Declining TL with increasing age in purple-crowned fairy-wrens. A significant nonlinear relationship between relative telomere length (rTL) and age as shown by generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) can be well approximated by log age (electronic supplementary material, table S2). Fitted values show standardized rTL predicted by log age in a linear mixed model (LMM), and back-transformed to the original age scale, with the ribbon showing 95% confidence intervals, incorporating uncertainty from all fixed effects in the LMM.
LMM shows the effect of age on rTL. Age effect estimates are on a natural-log-transformed scale. The β-estimates (β), standard errors (s.e.), degrees of freedom (d.f.), t-statistics (t) and associated p-values (p) for fixed effects and variances (σ2) attributable to random effects, are shown for each model parameter. Italicized shows parameters for which p < 0.05. When this log age effect is decomposed into within- and between-individual age effects on rTL, effect slopes are statistically similar for βW and βB of log age (electronic supplementary material, table S3).
| effect | s.e. | d.f. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intercept | 3.50 × 10−1 | 9.60 × 10−2 | 194.2 | 3.644 | <0.001 | — |
| log age | — | |||||
| storage time | − | — | ||||
| qPCR run | — | — | — | — | — | 0.082 |
| individual ID | — | — | — | — | — | 0.290 |
| (residual) | — | — | — | — | — | 0.575 |
LMM β-estimates and 95% confidence intervals of telomere effects on immune function. rTL, natural-log-transformed age, ΔrTL (within-individual) and μrTL (between-individual) β-estimates and 95% confidence intervals are unstandardized and presented in the units of each immune index (not back-transformed for CA and HL ratio). Estimates for the log age covariate are derived from models including rTL, shown fully in the electronic supplementary material, table S6 (as opposed to within-subject-centred models with ΔrTL and μrTL, shown fully in the electronic supplementary material, table S7). Italicized shows 95% confidence intervals that do not contain zero, as calculated using the confint() function of the lmerTest package.
| effect | immune index response variable | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| haptoglobin ( | NAbs ( | CA ( | HL ratio ( | |||||
| 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | |||||
| rTL | 0.001 | (−0.016, 0.018) | −0.018 | (−0.166, 0.128) | ( | 0.010 | (−0.007, 0.027) | |
| log age | −0.003 | (−0.023, 0.017) | ( | 0.068 | (−0.001, 0.135) | ( | ||
| ΔrTL | 0.003 | (−0.022, 0.028) | 0.150 | (−0.138, 0.434) | 0.074 | (−0.036, 0.184) | 0.015 | (−0.013, 0.042) |
| −0.001 | (−0.023, 0.021) | −0.064 | (−0.227, 0.097) | ( | 0.008 | (−0.012, 0.028) | ||
Figure 2The effect of rTL, natural-log-transformed age, ΔrTL (within-individual) and μrTL (between-individual) on indices of immune function. Each β-estimate is derived from values that were first corrected (as per statistical methods for rTL variables) and standardized prior to inclusion in models. Each β-estimate is then standardized and made comparable among immune index response variables by taking the β-estimate from each model and dividing by the standard deviation of the residuals of the same model minus the respective explanatory term, i.e. the effect is standardized by the deviation in the immune response attributable only to the explanatory term of interest in each model (and some small residual error). The rTL and log age effects presented derive from the cross-sectional LMM, while ΔrTL and μrTL derive from the within-subject-centred (longitudinal) LMM. CA and HL ratio were not back-transformed to their original distributions (from log and square-root, respectively). Bars show 95% confidence intervals calculated using the confint() function of the lmerTest package, standardized using the same methods as the β-estimates.