Literature DB >> 35601182

A novel analysis of Scheimpflug total corneal refractive power following corneal cross-linking in mild to moderate keratoconus.

Chao Pan1,2, Wei-Na Tan1,2, Dan Chen2, Yu Liu3, Hao-Yu Wang2, Deng-Feng Liang2, Yan-Jun Hua4, Xiao-Hua Lei2, Qing-Yan Zeng2, Shao-Zhen Zhao1.   

Abstract

AIM: To detect an earlier improvement in mild to moderate keratoconus following corneal cross-linking (CXL) with total corneal refractive power (TCRP) using ray tracing method.
METHODS: A total of 40 eyes of 30 consecutive patients who underwent CXL for progressive keratoconus were retrospectively enrolled. The following keratometric parameters provided by Pentacam HR, including maximum keratometry (Kmax), steepest keratometry (Ksteep), 3 mm zonal TCRP centered over corneal apex (TCRPapex,zone 3 mm), zonal mean keratometry and TCRP centered over corneal cone (Kmcone,zone and TCRPcone,zone 1, 2, 3 mm) were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12mo postoperatively. Groups 1 and 2 were defined based on Kmax at postoperative 1mo as improved (the initial improvement group) or worsen (the initial deterioration group) compared to the preoperative level.
RESULTS: In the overall group, only keratometric parameters based on ray tracing method displayed significant improvement early at 3mo postoperatively, in which TCRPcone,zone 1 mm and 2 mm exhibited the largest flattening (0.57 D and 0.53 D, respectively). In Group 1, only Kmax, Kmcone,zone 2 mm and TCRPcone,zone 2 mm showed significant improvement initially at 1mo postoperatively, in which Kmax exhibited the largest improvement (1.05 D), followed by TCRPcone,zone 2 mm (0.82 D). In Group 2, only keratometric parameters based on ray tracing method and Kmcone,zone 3 mm showed slight but not significant improvement early at 3mo, in which TCRPcone,zone 3 mm displayed the most improvement (0.19 D), followed by TCRPcone,zone 2 mm (0.15 D).
CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that a 2 mm zonal TCRP centered over Kmax could earlier detect keratometric improvement by CXL compared to other commonly used parameters in mild to moderate keratoconic eyes. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corneal cross-linking; keratoconus; keratometry; ray tracing; total corneal refractive power

Year:  2022        PMID: 35601182      PMCID: PMC9091875          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.05.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  32 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: preliminary results.

Authors:  Christine Wittig-Silva; Mark Whiting; Ecosse Lamoureux; Richard G Lindsay; Laurie J Sullivan; Grant R Snibson
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study.

Authors:  Aldo Caporossi; Cosimo Mazzotta; Stefano Baiocchi; Tomaso Caporossi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Pentacam HR criteria for curvature change in keratoconus and postoperative LASIK ectasia.

Authors:  Robert L Epstein; Yi-Lin Chiu; Greg L Epstein
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus.

Authors:  Bo-Wen Ouyang; Hui Ding; Han Wang; Zhen-Duo Yang; Tan Zhong; Hong-Ming Fan; Xing-Wu Zhong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Multicentre study: reliability and repeatability of Scheimpflug system measurement in keratoconus.

Authors:  Beatriz de Luis Eguileor; Pedro Arriola-Villalobos; Jose Ignacio Pijoan Zubizarreta; Raquel Feijoo Lera; Alaitz Santamaria Carro; David Diaz-Valle; Jaime Etxebarria
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Evaluation of the Reliability and Repeatability of Scheimpflug System Measurement in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Beatriz de Luis Eguileor; Julene Escudero Argaluza; Jose Ignacio Pijoán Zubizarreta; Alaitz Santamaria Carro; Jaime Etxebarria Ecenarro
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Repeated Same-Day Versus Single Tomography Measurements of Keratoconic Eyes for Analysis of Disease Progression.

Authors:  Wolf Wonneberger; Bertil Sterner; Ulrika MacLean; Margareta Claesson; Madeleine Zetterberg
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Time Course of Changes in Simulated Keratometry and Total Corneal Refractive Power after Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus.

Authors:  Masahide Takahashi; Kazutaka Kamiya; Yusuke Kono; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Assessing progression of keratoconus: novel tomographic determinants.

Authors:  Joshua K Duncan; Michael W Belin; Mark Borgstrom
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.