| Literature DB >> 35600662 |
Qiulin He1,2, Junxin Lin1,2, Fanghao Zhou3, Dandan Cai1,2, Yiyang Yan1,2, Yejie Shan3, Shufang Zhang1,2,4, Tiefeng Li3, Xudong Yao5, Hongwei Ouyang1,2,4,6.
Abstract
Nonuniform microstretching (NUMS) naturally occurs in real bone tissues in vivo, but its profound effects have not been identified yet. In order to explore the biological effects of NUMS and static stretch (uniform stretch [US]) on cells, a new "musical dish" device was developed. Musical signal was used to provide NUMS to cells. More stress fibers, arranging along the long axis of cells, were formed throughout the cells under NUMS, compared with US and untreated control group, although cell morphology did not show any alteration. Whole transcriptome sequencing revealed enhanced osteogenic differentiation of cells after NUMS treatment. Cells in the NUMS group showed a higher expression of bone-related genes, while genes related to stemness and other lineages were down-regulated. Our results give insights into the biological effects of NUMS and US on stem cell osteogenic differentiation, suggesting beneficial effects of micromechanical stimulus for osteogenesis. The newly developed device provides a basis for the development of NUMS derived rehabilitation technology to promote bone healing.Entities:
Keywords: regenerative medicine; stem cell therapies; tissue engineering
Year: 2022 PMID: 35600662 PMCID: PMC9115692 DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioeng Transl Med ISSN: 2380-6761
FIGURE 1Fabrication and strain characterization of the musical dish. (a) Schematics of the components in the musical dish. (b) The mechanism of cell stretching. (c) Picture of the musical dish. (d) Picture of the transparent electrode above a sheet with square lattice. (e,f) The static radial strain as a function of (e) applied voltage and (f) test number. (g,h) The cyclic radial strain under an alternating voltage between 0 V and 5 kV at (g) 0.15 Hz and (h) 1 Hz. Blue diamond: the average values of the maximum radial strains; orange square: the average values of the minimum radial strains; red circle: the difference between the maximum strains and the minimum strains
FIGURE 2Model analysis of the homogeneity and equiaxiality of the musical dish. (a) Geometry and parameter definition. (b) The prestretch and Maxwell stress loading steps in the finite element analysis (FEA) simulation. (c) The contour of radial strain. (d) The contour of hoop strain. (e) The strain distribution along Path 1. (f) The strain distribution along Path 2
FIGURE 3Fabrication and characterization of the musical dish culture system. (a) Diagram of musical dish culture system. (b) Pictures of musical dish at 0 and 4500 V. (c) Linear strain of musical dish from 0 to 5000 V. (d) CCK8 assay for cell proliferation in the musical dish and Petri dish groups between Days 1 and 5. (e) Phalloidin (red) and DAPI (blue) staining to show cell deformation under stretch by musical dish
FIGURE 4The effect of stretch stimulation on cell morphology and cell cytoskeleton. (a) The relationship between stretching amplitude and time in the NUMS group. (b) The relationship between stretching frequency and intensity of the musical signal. (c,d) Cell area (c) and cell aspect ratio (d) analysis to show cell morphology in the nonuniform microstretching (NUMS), uniform stretch (US), and control group from Day 1 to Day 4 (N = 3, n > 8). (e,f) Phalloidin/DAPI staining (e) and quantitative analysis (f) to show cell cytoskeleton in the NUMS, US, and control group after stimulated for 6 h (N = 3, n = 6)
FIGURE 5The effect of stretch stimulation on transcriptomic profiles. (a) Principal component analysis. (b) Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (c) Heatmap of differentially expressed genes between the nonuniform microstretching (NUMS) and uniform stretch (US) groups. (d) Heatmap of differentially expressed genes between the NUMS and control groups. (e,f) Up‐regulated gene ontology (GO) terms between the NUMS and control groups (e), as well as the NUMS and US groups (f)
FIGURE 6The effect of stretch stimulation on cell differentiation. (a–e) Q‐PCR analysis of the expression level of genes related to stemness (a,b), chondrogenesis (c), adipogenesis (d) and osteogenesis (e) after stimulation (N = 3, n = 3). (f,g) Q‐PCR analysis of the expression level of genes related to osteogenesis after osteogenic induction (N = 3, n = 3). (h,i) Alizarin red staining (h) and quantitative analysis (i) after osteogenic induction (N = 3, n = 3)
Material parameters of VHB 4910
| Parameters | Unit | Value |
|---|---|---|
|
| MPa | 0.0693 |
|
| MPa | −8.88 × 10−4 |
|
| MPa | 16.7 × 10−6 |
|
| As/Vm | 8.85 × 10−12 |
|
| ‐ | 4.7 |
primers for RT‐PCR
| Gene | 5′–3' | Primer | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse SOX2 | Forward | CTGGACTGCGAACTGGAGAAG | 67 |
| Reverse | TTTGCACCCCTCCCAATTC | ||
| Mouse Nanog | Forward | TTGAAGACTAGCAATGGTCTGAT | 125 |
| Reverse | TGGCTGCCCCACATGGAAAGG | ||
| Mouse Runx2 | Forward | TGACATCCCCATCCATCCAC | 120 |
| Reverse | AGAAGTCAGAGGTGGCAGTG | ||
| Mouse Ocn | Forward | TGCTTGTGACGAGCTATCAG | 149 |
| Reverse | GAGGACAGGGAGGATCAAGT | ||
| Mouse Sox9 | Forward | GAGGCCACGGAACAGACTCA | 51 |
| Reverse | CAGCGCCTTGAAGATAGCATT | ||
| Mouse PPARγ | Forward | CAGTTGATTTCTCCAGCATTTCT | 124 |
| Reverse | ACTTTGATCGCACTTTGGTATTC | ||
| Mouse Gapdh | Forward | GCAAGTTCAACGGCACAG | 141 |
| Reverse | CDCCAGTAGACTCCACGAC |