| Literature DB >> 35598185 |
Omobolanle Janet Jesumoroti1, Richard M Beteck1, Audrey Jordaan2, Digby F Warner2,3,4, Lesetja J Legoabe5.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Developing new anti-TB compounds using cost-effective processes is critical to reduce TB incidence and accomplish the End TB Strategy milestone. Herein, we describe the synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a library of thirty 7H-Pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives providing insights into the contributions of different aromatic, aryl and alkyl substitution at the C-4 position of the 7-deazapurine ring. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the compounds against the green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was assayed using the standard broth microdilution method, and cell toxicity was determined using the MTT assay. Sixteen compounds displayed in vitro activity against the GFP reporter strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with MIC90 values of 0.488-62.5 µM. This study highlights the most potent derivative, N-(4-phenoxy phenyl)-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-amine with a MIC90 value of 0.488 µM and was non-cytotoxic to the Vero cell line. Moreover, all the potent compounds from this series have a ClogP value less than 4 and molecular weight < 400; thus, likely to maintain drug-likeness during lead optimisation.Entities:
Keywords: 7H-pyrrolo [2,3-d] pyrimidines; Antitubercular activity; Cytotoxicity; SAR; Tuberculosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35598185 PMCID: PMC9124159 DOI: 10.1007/s11030-022-10453-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Divers ISSN: 1381-1991 Impact factor: 3.364
Fig. 1Structures of 7-deazupurine-based antitubercular agents and structurally related scaffolds
Fig. 2Design strategy for 7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine analogs
ClogP and MIC90 values of target compounds compared against rifampicin (standard drug)
| Compound | ClogP | MIC90(µM) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24 | 62.5 | |
| 2.56 | > 125 | |
| 2.55 | > 125 | |
| 2.14 | 62.5 | |
| 1.82 | 125 | |
| 2.77 | 31.25 | |
| 2.80 | 31.25 | |
| 2.78 | 125 | |
| 2.86 | 15.52 | |
| 2.88 | ||
| 3.43 | ||
| 1.64 | > 125 | |
| 1.66 | 62.5 | |
| 1.47 | > 125 | |
| 1.56 | ||
| 2.23 | 62.5 | |
| 1.50 | 30.44 | |
| 1.47 | 125 | |
| 2.55 | > 125 | |
| 2.77 | 125 | |
| 2.51 | 31.25 | |
| 2.83 | 14.45 | |
| 3.16 | ||
| 2.57 | ||
| 2.20 | 125 | |
| 0.33 | 125 | |
| 1.92 | 125 | |
| 1.14 | 125 | |
| 0.96 | 30.04 | |
| 2.63 | 15.62 | |
| 2.01 | 125 | |
| – |
aClog P values calculated with the Swiss ADME web tool (http://www.swissadme.ch/)
bMIC90 = determined in vitro against GFP Mtb strain, RF rifampicin
Fig. 3Structures and the percentage yields of the synthesised compounds from this study
Fig. 4Cell survival following treatment of BJ-5ta cells for 48 h with compound 11 in comparisons with the untreated control, as determined with the MTT assay (error bars = standard deviation, n = 3)
Fig. 5Cell survival following treatment of Vero cells for 48 h with compound 11 in comparisons with the untreated control, as determined with the MTT assay using (error bars = standard deviation, n = 3)
Computed properties of the selected active compounds using SWISS ADME
| Compound | Compound | Compound | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MW g/mol | 302.33 | 266.34 | 272.73 |
| −4.69 | −3.95 | −4.09 | |
| −5.09 | −4.46 | −4.37 | |
| H donor | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| H acceptor | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Lipinski #violation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| dTPSA (Å2) | 62.83 | 53.60 | 53.60 |
| No of rotatable bonds | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| GI absorption | High | High | High |
| CYP2C19 Inhibitor | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| eDrug Likeness | Yes | Yes | Yes |
aPredicted aqueous solubility, where log S is the logarithm of the amount of compound (in moles) able to dissolve in a litre of water
bESOL, predicted aqueous solubility, calculated using a topological method[38]
cEstimated aqueous solubility using a topological method [39] with log S scale: insoluble < − 10 < poorly < − 6 < moderately < − 4 < soluble < − 2 very soluble < 0 highly soluble
dTPSA, topological polar surface area, polarity: TPSA between ≤ 140 Å2[40]
eCalculated with reference to Lipinski's rule of five: MW ≤ 500 g/mol; log P ≤ 5; HBD ≤ 5; HBA ≤ 10; no more than one violation allowed [41]