| Literature DB >> 35596986 |
Jie Ma1, Fengyuan Chen1, Huo Xu1, Jingli Liu1, Ciara Chun Chen1, Zhen Zhang1, Hao Jiang2, Yanping Li1, Ke Pan3.
Abstract
Billions of discarded masks have entered the oceans since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Current reports mostly discuss the potential of masks as plastic pollution, but there has been no study on the fate of this emerging plastic waste in the marine environment. Therefore, we exposed masks in natural seawater and evaluated their aging and effects on the microbial community using a combination of physicochemical and biological techniques. After 30-day exposure in natural seawater, the masks suffered from significant aging. Microbial colonizers such as Rhodobacteraceae Flavobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae and fouling organisms like calcareous tubeworms Hydroides elegans were massively present on the masks. The roughness and modulus of the mask fiber increased 3 and 5 times, respectively, and the molecular weight decreased 7%. The growth of biofouling organisms caused the masks negatively buoyant after 14-30 days. Our study sheds some light on the fate of discarded masks in a coastal area and provides fundamental data to manage this important plastic waste during COVID-19 pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Marine environment; Masks; Microbials; Plastic pollution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35596986 PMCID: PMC9069998 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hazard Mater ISSN: 0304-3894 Impact factor: 14.224
Fig. 1The changes of different types of masks before and after exposure in coastal seawater. (A) Macroscopic observation showing the plastic yellowing and matter adhering to the surface of the samples after 7, 14, and 21 days and 1 month of exposure. (B) The changes of buoyancy of the samples after 7, 14, and 21 days and 1 month of exposure. Yellow shading shows neutral buoyancy of 1.0–1.05 in seawater. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Asterisks denote a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2Atomic force microscope (AFM) images showing the nano-scale changes of mask surfaces before and after 7, 14, and 21 days and 1 month in coastal seawater. (A) AFM morphology images and corresponding modulus and adhesion mapping of the mask surfaces. The red arrows in (A) show aging-generated nodules and pits. (B–D) The quantitative nano mechanical properties of roughness (B), modulus (C), and adhesion (D) of the exposed masks. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Asterisks denote a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Fig. 3The hardness of mask surfaces was measured by AFM nano-indentation before and after 7, 14, and 21 days and 1 month in coastal seawater. (A) Nano-surfaces of masks and the corresponding surfaces after indentation. Red circles show the indent holes formed by an AFM tip. (B) Calculated hardness from (A). Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Asterisks denote a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Molecular characteristics of spun-bond and melt-blown layers of masks before and after 7, 14, and 21 days and 1 month sampling in seawater (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Sampling time | Masks layers | Mz (g mol−1)a | Mw (g mol−1)b | Mn (g mol−1)c | Mw/Mn (MWD)d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Spun-bond (S) | 346,207 ± 2283 | 176,936 ± 1817 | 78,981 ± 596 | 2.24 ± 0.03 |
| 7 days | S | 325,529 ± 2517 | 175,398 ± 1386 | 76,887 ± 1141 | 2.28 ± 0.04 |
| 14 days | S | 314,823 ± 1712 | 170,696 ± 2610 | 70,738 ± 1679 | 2.41 ± 0.03 |
| 21 days | S | 311,371 ± 1343 | 170,444 ± 1165 | 73,520 ± 1852 | 2.32 ± 0.04 |
| 1 month | S | 301,049 ± 3310 | 167,583 ± 1495 | 73,773 ± 1967 | 2.27 ± 0.07 |
a Size average (Mz): Polymer’s toughness; b Weight average (Mw): Polymer’s melt viscosity, brittleness and chemical resistance; c Number average (Mn): Polymer’s flexural strength.; d Mw/Mn: Homogeneity.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectral parameters of the mask surfaces (the outer layer) after seawater exposure over time.
| Element | Core- | Assignmenta | Control | 7 days | 14 days | 21 days | 1 month | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APb | BEc | CDd (%) | AP | BE | CD | AP | BE | CD | AP | BE | CD | AP | BE | CD (%) | |||
| C | 1 s | Aromatic | 98.8 | 284.1 | 2.1 | 74.3 | 284.1 | 6.3 | 71.8 | 284.1 | 5.8 | 66.5 | 284.1 | 11.8 | 61.6 | 284.1 | 15.8 |
| Aliphatic | 284.9 | 94.9 | 284.9 | 81.0 | 284.9 | 60.2 | 284.9 | 58.3 | 284.9 | 42.4 | |||||||
| 285.9 | 1.7 | 285.9 | 5.3 | 286.3 | 22.1 | 286.3 | 17.7 | 286.2 | 28.3 | ||||||||
| 287.8 | 1.3 | 287.7 | 7.4 | 287.7 | 7.9 | 287.9 | 9.0 | 287.9 | 11.2 | ||||||||
| O- | 288.9 | 3.9 | 289.0 | 3.2 | 288.9 | 2.3 | |||||||||||
| O | 1 s | 1.2 | 18.7 | 531.8 | 50.2 | 20.5 | 531.8 | 58.5 | 23.3 | 531.7 | 60.3 | 24.1 | 531.6 | 66.2 | |||
| O | 532.8 | 100 | 533.0 | 49.8 | 533.0 | 41.5 | 533.0 | 39.7 | 532.8 | 33.8 | |||||||
| N | 1 s | 5.6 | 400.0 | 88.3 | 6.0 | 400.1 | 78.3 | 7.1 | 399.9 | 96.1 | 11.8 | 399.8 | 68.4 | ||||
| O | 402.1 | 11.7 | 402.0 | 21.7 | 401.8 | 3.9 | 401.7 | 31.6 | |||||||||
| P | 2p | Phosphate groups,2 | 0.5 | 133.6 | 0.6 | 133.5 | 0.9 | 133.3 | 0.9 | 133.4 | |||||||
| S | 2p | 0.5 | 163.9 | 14.8 | 0.4 | 163.9 | 37.6 | 0.4 | 163.8 | 40.1 | 0.5 | 163.9 | 52.2 | ||||
| 168.8 | 85.2 | 168.9 | 62.4 | 168.8 | 59.9 | 169.0 | 47.8 | ||||||||||
| Si | 2p | 0.2 | 102.1 | 92.9 | 0.2 | 102.3 | 44.7 | 0.2 | 102.3 | 45.9 | 0.2 | 102.2 | 40.8 | ||||
| 103.0 | 7.1 | 103.1 | 55.3 | 103.1 | 54.1 | 103.0 | 59.2 | ||||||||||
| Ca | 2p | 0.2 | 347.3 | 0.5 | 347.3 | 1.6 | 347.3 | 0.9 | 347.3 | ||||||||
a: references for the assignment of binding energy are shown in the supporting information. b: AP: atomic percentage; c: BE: binding energy; d: CD: component distribution; that is, the proportion of each component peak. Corresponding references in assignment column: 1. Liu et al., 2019; 2. Tesson et al., 2009; 3. Chen et al. (2021); 4. Mutel et al. (2000) (these references can be found in supplementary information).
Fig. 4Composition of prokaryotic community inhabiting masks after 7, 14, and 21 days and 1 month in coastal seawater. (A) Stacked bar plot showing the relative abundance of families with average abundance > 1% (n = 3) for each sample-collection date (7, 14, and 21 days and 1 month). (B) Corresponding heat map showing the difference in relative abundance between treatments. Asterisks in (B) represent the unique OTUs for each treatment.
Fig. 5Functional categories of microbes on mask-surface samples kept in seawater. The data were generated based on the 16 S genomes of top-100 most abundant OTUs of the samples. The relative abundance refers to the percent of total abundance assigned to each category.
Fig. 6Illustration of the putative aging pathways of polypropylene (PP) masks. (A) Chemical structure of PP and its summary of aging. (B) Representative image derived from AFM modulus mapping showing the typical initial fiber surface of a mask. (C) Corresponding surface image after 1 month in seawater, where crosslinking (green and yellow), chain scission (deep red and black) occurred.