Literature DB >> 32563114

Covid-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment.

Oluniyi O Fadare1, Elvis D Okoffo2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covid-19; Face masks: Plastic pollution; Microfibers; Microplastics; Single-use plastics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32563114      PMCID: PMC7297173          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


× No keyword cloud information.
Since the emergence and detection of Covid-19 in China and its declaration as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) (Murray et al., 2020), various measures have been put in place in different countries across the world to contain the virus and its further spread. Governments at all levels have brought up different ideas, including lockdown (staying at home), which has been adjudged the most effective preventive measure so far. Others are social distancing, travel restriction, isolation, good hand hygiene (washing of hands), avoiding public or crowded spaces as well as the mass wearing of disposable face masks (Freedman, 2020; Lin et al., 2020; Chintalapudi et al., 2020). Although the disposable face masks were primarily made for the protection of health-care workers (HCWs) to prevent occupational hazards, non-medical professionals adopted the use of face masks during the outbreak of SARS in 2003 and pdm H1N1 in 2009 (Elachola et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2008). Moreso, authorities had recommended the same for the masses to stem the widespread of these viruses. In regards to the current pandemic, researchers have advocated for the use of face masks by the general public until the mode of transmission of Covid-19 is fully understood (Leung et al., 2020). It has also been argued that it can help in reducing the number of times a person touches the face/mouth/nose with unwashed hands, which can significantly reduce the chance of infection. Previous studies have also demonstrated the effectiveness of face masks in protecting against respiratory infection during Hajj (Elachola et al., 2014; Barasheed et al., 2016). The introduction of face masks (Wu et al., 2020) as one of the precautionary measures to slow down the transmission rate of Covid-19 from person to person has resulted in a global shortage of face masks for the most venerable group, which are the HCWs (Wu et al., 2020). According to the WHO estimates, approximately 89 million medical masks were needed to respond to Covid-19 each month (WHO, 2020). This demand has resulted in an unprecedented rise in the global production of face masks which are produced using polymeric materials. Major players in face mask production have therefore scaled up their output. For instance, China increased its daily production of medical masks to 14.8 million as of February 2020 (Xinhua, 2020). Also, according to the Japanese Ministry of economy, trade, and industry (METI), over 600 million order of face masks per month was secured as of April 2020 (METI, 2020). The demand is expected to increase as the number of Covid-19 infected persons globally stands at 3.84 million, with over 260, 000 deaths as of May 7, 2020 (Worldometer, 2020). Moreso, many countries are relaxing lockdown orders due to the adverse effects on the economy and mental health, and this could lead to a second wave of infection. Disposable face masks (single use face masks) are produced from polymers such as polypropylene, polyurethane, polyacrylonitrile, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polyethylene, or polyester (Potluri and Needham, 2005). They consist of three layers; an inner layer (soft fibers), middle layer (melt-blown filter), and an outer layer (nonwoven fibers, which are water-resistant and usually colored). The melt-blown filter is the main filtering layer of the mask produced by the conventional fabrication of micro- and nanofibers, where melted polymer is extruded through tiny nozzles, with high speed blowing gas (Dutton, 2008). Fig. 1 shows the basic principle of face mask production through electrospinning (Zafar et al., 2016). There may exist variations in the formation of the product from one manufacturer to the other. Table 1 showed different face mask’ brands and their description.
Fig. 1

Process of producing nanofibers through electrospinning used in face mask production (Zafar et al., 2016).

Table 1

Different manufacturers' brand and their description (Leonas et al., 2003).

Mask nameDescription
Tie-on surgical face mask3-ply, pleated rayon outer web with polypropylene inner web
Classical surgical mask, Blue3-ply, pleated cellulose polypropylene, polyester
Sofloop extra protection mask3-ply, pleated blended cellulosic fibers with polypropylene and polyester, ethylene methyl acrylate strip
Aseptex fluid resistantMolded rayon and polypropylene blend with an acrylic binder
Surgine II cone maskMolded polypropylene and polyester with cellulose fibers
Surgical grade cone style maskMolded polypropylene
Process of producing nanofibers through electrospinning used in face mask production (Zafar et al., 2016). Different manufacturers' brand and their description (Leonas et al., 2003). The increase in production and consumption of face mask across the world has given rise to a new environmental challenge, adding to the vast plastic and plastic particle waste in the environment. Some of these materials are getting into waterways from where they reach the freshwater and marine environment adding to the presence of plastics in the aquatic medium. For instance, OceansAsia, an organization committed to advocacy and research on marine pollution, reported in February 2020, the presence of face masks of different types and colours in an ocean in Hong Kong. Also, the collection of face masks along a highway and drainage in Ile-Ife, Nigeria, on May 5, 2020 (Fig. 2 ). This new emergence of face masks as environmental litter both in the terrestrial and aquatic environment is a piece of evidence that the global pandemic has not in any way reduced the challenge of increasing plastic pollution in the environment.
Fig. 2

Collection of various Covid-19 face masks of different types and colours from an ocean and terrestrial environment in Hong Kong and Nigeria respectively. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Collection of various Covid-19 face masks of different types and colours from an ocean and terrestrial environment in Hong Kong and Nigeria respectively. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Single-use polymeric materials have been identified as a significant source of plastics and plastic particle pollution in the environment (Schnurr et al., 2018). For instance, plastic packaging materials, drinking bottles, and fast food containers are leading sources of microplastics pollution globally (Fadare et al., 2020). Similarly, disposable face masks (single use) that get to the environment (disposal in landfill, dumpsites, freshwater, oceans or littering at public spaces) could be emerging new source of microplastic fibers, as they can degrade/fragment or break down into smaller size/pieces of particles under 5 mm known as microplastics under environmental conditions. The Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis (see Supporting Information for details) of the degrading face masks (Fig. 3 ) was carried out using PerkinElmer, UATR Two, USA, against a plastic specific spectral library (Perkin Elmer ATR of Polymers Library). The spectra showed a characteristic peaks of a polypropylene for the outer layer (Fig. 3a) and polyethylene high density for the inner layer (Fig. 3b). The spectra provide a piece of evidence that face masks could increase the accumulation of their related microparticles in the environment within a short time.
Fig. 3

Face masks at different stages of degradation in the environment and typical FT-IR spectra of the degrading fibers, outer layer (a) and inner layer (b).

Face masks at different stages of degradation in the environment and typical FT-IR spectra of the degrading fibers, outer layer (a) and inner layer (b). The environmental implication of plastics and plastic particles pollution have been enumerated and demonstrated by erudite scholars in various literature (Browne et al., 2008; Cole et al., 2014; Galloway et al., 2017; Rist et al., 2018; Wright et al., 2013). Some of these adverse consequences include threat to aquatic lives, which constitute a major part of the food web and support to human existence. Plastic particles are getting into foods meant for human consumption, raising a concern on global food safety (Fadare et al., 2020). Reduction in aesthetic and recreational worth, which are vital to human social and mental stability. The presence of plastics in the environment has also been reported as contributing significantly to climate change due to carbon emission and a greater risk to the global food chain (Reid et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2019). Another implication of this indiscriminately disposed face masks in the environment is the possibility of acting as a medium for disease outbreak, as plastic particles are known to propagate microbes such as invasive pathogens (Reid et al., 2019). Although there is currently no unified international regulation on plastics regulation and pollution management, probably due to conflict of economic interests, few countries have however, put in place strict measures to curb the unabated proliferation of plastic waste. For instance, the Marine Waste Project of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), approved under the Marine Waste Action Acts by the European Commission, is expected to promote among other things, awareness towards plastic particles pollution through the public education program (Li et al., 2019). Also, countries like Ireland has placed levy on consumers of single-use bag, China and South Africa combined both ban and levies on retailers. While placing ban on face masks remains the least option at the moment, considering its positive impacts in the ongoing global fight against the Covid-19, sensitization of the populace can greatly help in the management of these litters. Furthermore, strengthening critical thinking in research to provide eco-friendly alternatives while enhancing effective waste management system can assist in finding a sustainable solution to plastic pollution. Mobilization and awareness on Covid-19 prevention are intense across the globe; it will indeed be laudable if the awareness on safeguarding our environment through reduction, elimination (where possible) and proper management of our disposable face masks can as well be carried along. Who knows? Plastic pollution may be the next world pandemic.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Oluniyi O. Fadare: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Resources. Elvis D. Okoffo: Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Resources.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  20 in total

1.  Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity.

Authors:  Andrea J Reid; Andrew K Carlson; Irena F Creed; Erika J Eliason; Peter A Gell; Pieter T J Johnson; Karen A Kidd; Tyson J MacCormack; Julian D Olden; Steve J Ormerod; John P Smol; William W Taylor; Klement Tockner; Jesse C Vermaire; David Dudgeon; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-11-22

2.  Can microplastics pose a threat to ocean carbon sequestration?

Authors:  Maocai Shen; Shujing Ye; Guangming Zeng; Yaxin Zhang; Lang Xing; Wangwang Tang; Xiaofeng Wen; Shaoheng Liu
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  A critical perspective on early communications concerning human health aspects of microplastics.

Authors:  Sinja Rist; Bethanie Carney Almroth; Nanna B Hartmann; Therese M Karlsson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Microplastics from consumer plastic food containers: Are we consuming it?

Authors:  Oluniyi O Fadare; Bin Wan; Liang-Hong Guo; Lixia Zhao
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 5.  Potential of Electrospun Nanofibers for Biomedical and Dental Applications.

Authors:  Muhammad Zafar; Shariq Najeeb; Zohaib Khurshid; Masoud Vazirzadeh; Sana Zohaib; Bilal Najeeb; Farshid Sefat
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Mass gathering-related mask use during 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus.

Authors:  Habida Elachola; Abdullah M Assiri; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Mask-wearing and respiratory infection in healthcare workers in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Peng Yang; Holly Seale; C Raina MacIntyre; Haiyan Zhang; Zhen Zhang; Yi Zhang; Xiaoli Wang; Xinyu Li; Xinghuo Pang; Quanyi Wang
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.949

8.  Respirators and surgical facemasks for COVID-19: implications for MRI.

Authors:  O M Murray; J M Bisset; P J Gilligan; M M Hannan; J G Murray
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Facemask shortage and the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak: Reflections on public health measures.

Authors:  Huai-Liang Wu; Jian Huang; Casper J P Zhang; Zonglin He; Wai-Kit Ming
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-04-03

10.  COVID-19: Facemask use prevalence in international airports in Asia, Europe and the Americas, March 2020.

Authors:  Habida Elachola; Shahul H Ebrahim; Ernesto Gozzer
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 6.211

View more
  133 in total

Review 1.  Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards?

Authors:  Kai Kisielinski; Paul Giboni; Andreas Prescher; Bernd Klosterhalfen; David Graessel; Stefan Funken; Oliver Kempski; Oliver Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Risks of Covid-19 face masks to wildlife: Present and future research needs.

Authors:  Ana L Patrício Silva; Joana C Prata; Catherine Mouneyrac; Damià Barcelò; Armando C Duarte; Teresa Rocha-Santos
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Practice, benefits, and impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) during COVID-19 pandemic: Envisioning the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) through the lens of clean water sanitation, life below water, and life on land in Fiji.

Authors:  Aneesh A Chand; Prashant P Lal; Kushal A Prasad; Kabir A Mamun
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 4.  COVID-19 false dichotomies and a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding public health, COVID-19 symptomatology, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mask wearing, and reinfection.

Authors:  Kevin Escandón; Angela L Rasmussen; Isaac I Bogoch; Eleanor J Murray; Karina Escandón; Saskia V Popescu; Jason Kindrachuk
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Microplastics in the environment: Occurrence, perils, and eradication.

Authors:  Surbhi Sharma; Soumen Basu; Nagaraj P Shetti; Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda; Tejraj M Aminabhavi
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 13.273

Review 6.  Municipal solid waste management during COVID-19 pandemic: effects and repercussions.

Authors:  Mahmood Yousefi; Vahide Oskoei; Ahmad Jonidi Jafari; Mahdi Farzadkia; Masoumeh Hasham Firooz; Behnaz Abdollahinejad; Javavd Torkashvand
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Study of Recycling Potential of FFP2 Face Masks and Characterization of the Plastic Mix-Material Obtained. A Way of Reducing Waste in Times of Covid-19.

Authors:  Cristina Crespo; Gemma Ibarz; Carlos Sáenz; Pablo Gonzalez; Sandra Roche
Journal:  Waste Biomass Valorization       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Plastic and its consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Fabiula Danielli Bastos de Sousa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Facemasks: A Looming Microplastic Crisis.

Authors:  Janith Dissanayake; Cecilia Torres-Quiroz; Jyoti Mahato; Junboum Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Review of the valorization options for the proper disposal of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nilofar Asim; Marzieh Badiei; Kamaruzzaman Sopian
Journal:  Environ Technol Innov       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.