| Literature DB >> 32563114 |
Oluniyi O Fadare1, Elvis D Okoffo2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Covid-19; Face masks: Plastic pollution; Microfibers; Microplastics; Single-use plastics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32563114 PMCID: PMC7297173 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963
Fig. 1Process of producing nanofibers through electrospinning used in face mask production (Zafar et al., 2016).
Different manufacturers' brand and their description (Leonas et al., 2003).
| Mask name | Description |
|---|---|
| Tie-on surgical face mask | 3-ply, pleated rayon outer web with polypropylene inner web |
| Classical surgical mask, Blue | 3-ply, pleated cellulose polypropylene, polyester |
| Sofloop extra protection mask | 3-ply, pleated blended cellulosic fibers with polypropylene and polyester, ethylene methyl acrylate strip |
| Aseptex fluid resistant | Molded rayon and polypropylene blend with an acrylic binder |
| Surgine II cone mask | Molded polypropylene and polyester with cellulose fibers |
| Surgical grade cone style mask | Molded polypropylene |
Fig. 2Collection of various Covid-19 face masks of different types and colours from an ocean and terrestrial environment in Hong Kong and Nigeria respectively. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Face masks at different stages of degradation in the environment and typical FT-IR spectra of the degrading fibers, outer layer (a) and inner layer (b).