| Literature DB >> 34323718 |
Silvia Morgana1, Barbara Casentini2, Stefano Amalfitano2.
Abstract
Wearing face masks is a fundamental prevention and control measure to limit the spread of COVID-19. The universal use and improper disposal of single-use face masks are raising serious concerns for their environmental impact, owing to the foregone contribution to plastic water pollution during and beyond the pandemic. This study aims to uncover the release of micro/nanoplastics generated from face mask nonwoven textiles once discarded in the aquatic environment. As assessed by microscopy and flow cytometry, the exposure to different levels of mechanical stress forces (from low to high shear stress intensities) was proved effective in breaking and fragmenting face mask fabrics into smaller debris, including macro-, micro-, and nano-plastics. Even at the low level of fabric deterioration following the first second of treatment, a single mask could release in water thousands of microplastic fibers and up to 108 submicrometric particles, mostly comprised in the nano-sized domain. By contributing to the current lack of knowledge regarding the potential environmental hazards posed by universal face masking, we provided novel quantitative data, through a suitable technological approach, on the release of micro/nanoplastics from single-use face masks that can threaten the aquatic ecosystems to which they finally end-up.Entities:
Keywords: Flow cytometry; Microfibers; Microscopy; Nanoplastics; Water pollution
Year: 2021 PMID: 34323718 PMCID: PMC8234265 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hazard Mater ISSN: 0304-3894 Impact factor: 10.588
Fig. 1Deterioration of PP fabric excised from a face mask at increasing treatment time (from 1 s to 120 s) and shear stress intensities (from 1.6 kJ/L to 192.0 kJ/L) (scale bar = 10 mm). 40 × Microscopic images (black boxes) show the intact and progressively damaged fabric texture (scale bar = 1 mm).
Effects of shear stress intensity (i.e., treatment time and shear power) on fabric texture damage, water temperature (°C), and fabric deterioration (% of weight loss).
| Shear time (s) | Energy density (kJ/L) | Water T (°C) | Weight loss (mg) | Fabric deterioration (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6 | 17.5 | 1.0 ± 1.6 | 0.2 ± 0.3 |
| 15 | 24.0 | 18.0 | 1.6 ± 1.0 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| 30 | 48.0 | 18.2 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| 60 | 96.0 | 19.1 | 11.2 ± 7.3 | 2.1 ± 1.4 |
| 120 | 192.0 | 21.0 | 15.6 ± 12.3 | 3.2 ± 2.7 |
Mean values (± standard deviation of triplicates) are reported.
4 replicates.
Fig. 2Selected images of microplastic fragments and fibers excised from the PP filament web of the face mask fabric and released in water during the shear tests (scale bar = 0.1 mm).
Fig. 3Patterns of particle release from face mask fabric in water at increasing shear stress and fabric deterioration. Symbol size increases with treatment time. Sigmoid Weibull and lognormal distributions were applied to model the occurrence of particles within the 5 size classes.
Fig. 4Relative contribution to total number (a) and weight mass (b) of detected micro/nanoplastics released in water during the shear tests. Conversion in weight was based on particle morphology and mean size within the 5 size classes.