Literature DB >> 3559579

Factors influencing walking and stairclimbing following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

J N Weinstein, T P Andriacchi, J Galante.   

Abstract

The authors quantitatively evaluated the relationship between component placement, limb alignment, and function following unicompartmental knee replacement surgery. It was found that anatomic alignment, prosthetic positioning, and prosthetic design influence the patients' ability to walk and climb stairs. There was wide variation in the placement of the tibial and femoral component among patients. The placement of the femoral component corresponded directly to function during stairclimbing and level walking. Anterior malpositioning of the femoral component resulted in reduced ability to climb stairs. The tibial component position varied primarily in varus-valgus position. Varus-valgus alignment in the frontal plane correlated directly with the magnitude of the adduction moment during level walking. A varus alignment produced a twofold increase in the magnitude of the adduction moment at the knee during walking. Given the potential advantages of the unicompartmental knee, improved precision in component placement should improve the long-term results of hemiarthroplasty knee surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3559579     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(86)80048-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  [The causes of failures in unicondylar knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  B Maudhuit
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

2.  Difference in knee rotation between total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties during stair climbing.

Authors:  Myung-Chul Jung; Jun Young Chung; Kwang-Hyun Son; Hui Wang; Jaejin Hwang; Jay Joong Kim; Joon Ho Kim; Byoung-Hyun Min
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Muscle activity around the knee and gait performance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients: a comparative study on fixed- and mobile-bearing designs.

Authors:  Fabio Catani; Maria Grazia Benedetti; Luca Bianchi; Valentina Marchionni; Sandro Giannini; Alberto Leardini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Knee moments after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty during stair ascent.

Authors:  Yang-Chieh Fu; Kathy J Simpson; Cathleen Brown; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Does interlimb knee symmetry exist after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Yang-Chieh Fu; Kathy J Simpson; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biomechanical Effect of UHMWPE and CFR-PEEK Insert on Tibial Component in Unicompartmental Knee Replacement in Different Varus and Valgus Alignments.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Hyoung-Taek Hong; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Lower limb kinematics of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty individuals during stair ascent.

Authors:  Rumit Singh Kakar; Yang-Chieh Fu; Tracy L Kinsey; Cathleen N Brown; Ormonde M Mahoney; Kathy J Simpson
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-01

8.  Better clinical outcomes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty when comparing with high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Seung-Beom Han; Hee-Soo Kyung; In-Wook Seo; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Better outcomes and reduced failures for arthroplasty over osteotomy for advanced compartmental knee osteoarthritis in patients older than 50 years.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Arne Driessen; Francesco Oliva; Gayle D Maffulli; Markus Tingart; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.