BACKGROUND: For unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), abnormal loading on the tibiofemoral joint could exacerbate knee osteoarthritis or implant wear. Joint moments are an indirect measure of such loading. However, little is known about knee moments of patients with UKA, tempering enthusiasm for its use. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In patients with UKAs performing stair ascent, we (1) determined whether interlimb differences for knee moments are demonstrated, (2) described the knee kinetics of patients with medial and lateral UKAs, and (3) investigated possible factors that might influence the knee abductor moments. METHODS: In our cross-sectional study, we recruited 26 patients with UKA with nondiseased contralateral limbs who performed stair ascent. Seventeen patients had medial UKAs and nine had lateral UKAs. Paired t-tests and CIs were applied to determine interlimb differences within each UKA group for peak knee moments and times to peak moments. RESULTS: During stair ascent, the medial UKA group displayed greater peak extensor moments for the nondiseased compared to the UKA limb (p = 0.030), whereas the lateral UKA group did not (p = 0.087). For both medial and lateral UKA groups, the UKA limb demonstrated greater internal peak abductor moments (p = 0.005 and 0.013, respectively). Both UKA groups exhibited knee moments similar to those in the literature. Limb dominance and postoperative time were correlated for both UKA groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced knee extensor moments of limbs with UKA displayed by some participants may indicate less compressive loading on the tibiofemoral joint surfaces, whereas the increased abductor moments suggest increased compression on the medial compartment. These findings suggest UKA knees may not be subjected to excessive loads regardless of the side reconstructed.
BACKGROUND: For unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), abnormal loading on the tibiofemoral joint could exacerbate knee osteoarthritis or implant wear. Joint moments are an indirect measure of such loading. However, little is known about knee moments of patients with UKA, tempering enthusiasm for its use. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In patients with UKAs performing stair ascent, we (1) determined whether interlimb differences for knee moments are demonstrated, (2) described the knee kinetics of patients with medial and lateral UKAs, and (3) investigated possible factors that might influence the knee abductor moments. METHODS: In our cross-sectional study, we recruited 26 patients with UKA with nondiseased contralateral limbs who performed stair ascent. Seventeen patients had medial UKAs and nine had lateral UKAs. Paired t-tests and CIs were applied to determine interlimb differences within each UKA group for peak knee moments and times to peak moments. RESULTS: During stair ascent, the medial UKA group displayed greater peak extensor moments for the nondiseased compared to the UKA limb (p = 0.030), whereas the lateral UKA group did not (p = 0.087). For both medial and lateral UKA groups, the UKA limb demonstrated greater internal peak abductor moments (p = 0.005 and 0.013, respectively). Both UKA groups exhibited knee moments similar to those in the literature. Limb dominance and postoperative time were correlated for both UKA groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced knee extensor moments of limbs with UKA displayed by some participants may indicate less compressive loading on the tibiofemoral joint surfaces, whereas the increased abductor moments suggest increased compression on the medial compartment. These findings suggest UKA knees may not be subjected to excessive loads regardless of the side reconstructed.
Authors: Karl F Orishimo; Ian J Kremenic; Ajit J Deshmukh; Stephen J Nicholas; Jose A Rodriguez Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Shaw Akizuki; John K P Mueller; Hiroshi Horiuchi; Daigo Matsunaga; Atsuyuki Shibakawa; Richard D Komistek Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 4.757