Literature DB >> 35595510

Effect of Isomaltulose on Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Jinchi Xie1, Jingkuo Li1, Qi Qin2, Hua Ning3, Zhiping Long1, Yu Gao1, Yue Yu1, Zhen Han1, Fan Wang1, Maoqing Wang3.   

Abstract

Evidence regarding the effect of isomaltulose on glycemic and insulinemic responses is still conflicting, which limits isomaltulose's application in glycemic management. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate its effectiveness and evidence quality. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) prior to October 2021. RCTs were eligible for inclusion if they enrolled adults to oral intake of isomaltulose or other carbohydrates dissolved in water after an overnight fast and compared their 2-h postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations. The DerSimonian-Laird method was used to pool the means of the circulating glucose and insulin concentrations. Both random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to calculate the weighted mean difference in postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations in different groups. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Finally, 11 RCTs (n = 175 participants) were included. The trials were conducted in 4 countries (Japan, Brazil, Germany, and the Netherlands), and all of the enrolled participants were >18 y of age with various health statuses (healthy, type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and hypertension). Moderate evidence suggested that oral isomaltulose caused an attenuated glycemic response compared with sucrose at 30 min. Low evidence suggested that oral isomaltulose caused an attenuated but more prolonged glycemic response than sucrose and an attenuated insulinemic response. Low-to-moderate levels of evidence suggest there may be more benefit of isomaltulose for people with type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, or hypertension; older people; overweight or obese people; and Asian people. The study was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) as CRD42021290396 (available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes; glycemic and insulinemic response; isomaltulose; palatinose; systematic review and meta-analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35595510      PMCID: PMC9526864          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmac057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   11.567


  35 in total

1.  Effects of Palatinose and Sucrose Intake on Glucose Metabolism and Incretin Secretion in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Farnaz Keyhani-Nejad; Margrit Kemper; Rita Schueler; Olga Pivovarova; Natalia Rudovich; Andreas F H Pfeiffer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  The glycaemic index values of foods containing fructose are affected by metabolic differences between subjects.

Authors:  T M S Wolever; A L Jenkins; V Vuksan; J Campbell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Insulin and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Gisela Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2005-05

Review 4.  Effect of dietary carbohydrate restriction on glycemic control in adults with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma Sainsbury; Nathalie V Kizirian; Stephanie R Partridge; Timothy Gill; Stephen Colagiuri; Alice A Gibson
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition.

Authors:  Pouya Saeedi; Inga Petersohn; Paraskevi Salpea; Belma Malanda; Suvi Karuranga; Nigel Unwin; Stephen Colagiuri; Leonor Guariguata; Ayesha A Motala; Katherine Ogurtsova; Jonathan E Shaw; Dominic Bright; Rhys Williams
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 5.602

6.  Age-Dependent Decline in the Coordinated [Ca2+] and Insulin Secretory Dynamics in Human Pancreatic Islets.

Authors:  Matthew J Westacott; Nikki L Farnsworth; Joshua R St Clair; Greg Poffenberger; Audrey Heintz; Nurin W Ludin; Nathaniel J Hart; Alvin C Powers; Richard K P Benninger
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  Insulin resistance persists despite a metabolically healthy obesity phenotype.

Authors:  Kristin K Hoddy; Christopher L Axelrod; Jacob T Mey; Adithya Hari; Robbie A Beyl; Jourdan B Blair; Wagner S Dantas; John P Kirwan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 9.298

8.  Reduced glycaemic and insulinaemic responses following isomaltulose ingestion: implications for postprandial substrate use.

Authors:  Judith G P van Can; T Herman Ijzerman; Luc J C van Loon; Fred Brouns; Ellen E Blaak
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Metabolic effects of replacing sucrose by isomaltulose in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  Stefanie Brunner; Ines Holub; Stephan Theis; Andrea Gostner; Ralph Melcher; Petra Wolf; Ulrike Amann-Gassner; Wolfgang Scheppach; Hans Hauner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Efficacy of Isomaltulose Compared to Sucrose in Modulating Endothelial Function in Overweight Adults.

Authors:  Eric de Groot; Lisa Schweitzer; Stephan Theis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.