Literature DB >> 19471291

The glycaemic index values of foods containing fructose are affected by metabolic differences between subjects.

T M S Wolever1, A L Jenkins, V Vuksan, J Campbell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Glycaemic responses are influenced by carbohydrate absorption rate, type of monosaccharide absorbed and the presence of fat; the effect of some of these factors may be modulated by metabolic differences between subjects. We hypothesized that glycaemic index (GI) values are affected by the metabolic differences between subjects for foods containing fructose or fat, but not for starchy foods. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: The GI values of white bread (WB), fruit leather (FL) and chocolate-chip cookies (CCC) (representing starch, fructose and fat, respectively) were determined in subjects (n=77) recruited to represent all 16 possible combinations of age (< or =40, >40 years), sex (male, female), ethnicity (Caucasian, non-Caucasian) and body mass index (BMI) (< or =25, >25 kg/m2) using glucose as the reference. At screening, fasting insulin, lipids, c-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate transaminase (AST) and waist circumference (WC) were measured.
RESULTS: There were no significant main effects of age, sex, BMI or ethnicity on GI, but there were several food x subject-factor interactions. Different factors affected each food's area under the curve (AUC) and GI. The AUC after oral glucose was related to ethnicity, age and triglycerides (r 2=0.27); after WB to ethnicity, age, triglycerides, sex and CRP (r 2=0.43); after CCC to age and weight (r 2=0.18); and after FL to age and CRP (r 2=0.12). GI of WB was related to ethnicity (r 2=0.12) and of FL to AST, insulin and WC (r 2=0.23); but there were no significant correlations for CCC.
CONCLUSIONS: The GI values of foods containing fructose might be influenced by metabolic differences between -subjects, whereas the GI of starchy foods might be affected by ethnicity. However, the proportion of variation explained by subject factors is small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19471291     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  10 in total

1.  Estimating the reliability of glycemic index values and potential sources of methodological and biological variability.

Authors:  Nirupa R Matthan; Lynne M Ausman; Huicui Meng; Hocine Tighiouart; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Effect of Isomaltulose on Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jinchi Xie; Jingkuo Li; Qi Qin; Hua Ning; Zhiping Long; Yu Gao; Yue Yu; Zhen Han; Fan Wang; Maoqing Wang
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 11.567

3.  A Systematic Review of Literature on the Representation of Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in Clinical Nutrition Interventions.

Authors:  Jaapna Dhillon; Ashley G Jacobs; Sigry Ortiz; L Karina Diaz Rios
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 11.567

4.  Effect of ethnicity on glycaemic index: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T M S Wolever; J L Giddens; J L Sievenpiper
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 5.097

Review 5.  How Lifestyle Factors Affect Cognitive and Executive Function and the Ability to Learn in Children.

Authors:  Jamie Jirout; Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch; Khara Turnbull; Yin Gu; Mayaris Cubides; Sarah Garzione; Tanya M Evans; Arthur L Weltman; Sibylle Kranz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Use of a Continuous Glucose Monitor to Determine the Glycaemic Index of Rice-Based Mixed Meals, Their Effect on a 24 h Glucose Profile and Its Influence on Overweight and Obese Young Adults' Meal Preferences.

Authors:  Khadidja Chekima; Benjamin Tziak Ze Wong; Mohd Ismail Noor; Yasmin Beng Houi Ooi; See Wan Yan; Brahim Chekima
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Decreasing the RAG:SAG ratio of granola cereal predictably reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses: a report of four randomised trials in healthy adults.

Authors:  Thomas M S Wolever; Alexandra L Jenkins; Janice E Campbell; Adish Ezatagha; Simarata Dhillon; Jodee Johnson; John Schuette; Yumin Chen; YiFang Chu
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2022-03-17

8.  The use of different reference foods in determining the glycemic index of starchy and non-starchy test foods.

Authors:  Bernard J Venn; Minako Kataoka; Jim Mann
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method.

Authors:  Thomas M S Wolever; Alexandra Meynier; Alexandra L Jenkins; Jennie C Brand-Miller; Fiona S Atkinson; David Gendre; Sébastien Leuillet; Murielle Cazaubiel; Béatrice Housez; Sophie Vinoy
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  The effect of oat β-glucan on postprandial blood glucose and insulin responses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreea Zurbau; Jarvis C Noronha; Tauseef A Khan; John L Sievenpiper; Thomas M S Wolever
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.016

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.