Literature DB >> 35595373

ProPACC: Protocol for a Trial of Integrated Specialty Palliative Care for Critically Ill Older Adults.

Sarah K Andersen1, Grace Vincent1, Rachel A Butler2, Elke H P Brown1, Dave Maloney1, Sana Khalid1, Rae Oanesa1, James Yun3, Carrie Pidro3, Valerie N Davis3, Judith Resick4, Aaron Richardson3, Kimberly Rak3, Jackie Barnes3, Karl B Bezak4, Andrew Thurston5, Eva Reitschuler-Cross6, Linda A King5, Ian Barbash7, Ali Al-Khafaji8, Emily Brant8, Jonathan Bishop8, Jennifer McComb9, Chung-Chou H Chang10, Jennifer Seaman11, Jennifer S Temel12, Derek C Angus3, Robert Arnold13, Yael Schenker4, Douglas B White14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately one million older adults die in American intensive care units (ICUs) or survive with significant functional impairment. Inadequate symptom management, surrogates' psychological distress and inappropriate healthcare use are major concerns. Pioneering work by Dr. J. Randall Curtis paved the way for integrating palliative care (PC) specialists to address these needs, but convincing proof of efficacy has not yet been demonstrated.
DESIGN: We will conduct a multicenter patient-randomized efficacy trial of integrated specialty PC (SPC) vs. usual care for 500 high-risk ICU patients over age 60 and their surrogate decision-makers from five hospitals in Pennsylvania. INTERVENTION: The intervention will follow recommended best practices for inpatient PC consultation. Patients will receive care from a multidisciplinary SPC team within 24 hours of enrollment that continues until hospital discharge or death. SPC clinicians will meet with patients, families, and the ICU team every weekday. SPC and ICU clinicians will jointly participate in proactive family meetings according to a predefined schedule. Patients in the control arm will receive routine ICU care. OUTCOMES: Our primary outcome is patient-centeredness of care, measured using the modified Patient Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care scale. Secondary outcomes include surrogates' psychological symptom burden and health resource utilization. Other outcomes include patient survival, as well as interprofessional collaboration. We will also conduct prespecified subgroup analyses using variables such as PC needs, measured by the Needs of Social Nature, Existential Concerns, Symptoms, and Therapeutic Interaction scale.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial will provide robust evidence about the impact of integrating SPC with critical care on patient, family, and health system outcomes.
Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intensive care; clinical trial; palliative care; patient-centered care; quality of communication; surrogate decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35595373      PMCID: PMC9299559          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   5.576


  71 in total

Review 1.  Measuring and improving the quality of dying and death.

Authors:  Donald L Patrick; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg; Elizabeth Nielsen; Ellen McCown
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Critical care delivery in the United States: distribution of services and compliance with Leapfrog recommendations.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Andrew F Shorr; Alan White; Tony T Dremsizov; Robert J Schmitz; Mark A Kelley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  A Randomized Trial of a Family-Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Douglas B White; Derek C Angus; Anne-Marie Shields; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Caroline Pidro; Cynthia Paner; Elizabeth Chaitin; Chung-Chou H Chang; Francis Pike; Lisa Weissfeld; Jeremy M Kahn; Joseph M Darby; Amy Kowinsky; Susan Martin; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  How Often Is End-of-Life Care in the United States Inconsistent with Patients' Goals of Care?

Authors:  Nita Khandelwal; J Randall Curtis; Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Pedro Gozalo; Ruth A Engelberg; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  An evaluation of the Decisional Conflict Scale for measuring the quality of end-of-life decision making.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Song; Susan M Sereika
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-06-20

6.  Validation of Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview.

Authors:  J M Teno; B Clarridge; V Casey; S Edgman-Levitan; J Fowler
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Three-year outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries who survive intensive care.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Carmen Guerra; Amber E Barnato; Derek C Angus; Guohua Li; Walter T Linde-Zwirble
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical intensive care unit for patients with terminal dementia.

Authors:  Margaret L Campbell; Jorge A Guzman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Protocol and Fidelity Monitoring Plan for Four Supports. A Multicenter Trial of an Intervention to Support Surrogate Decision Makers in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Jennifer B Seaman; Robert M Arnold; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Anne-Marie Shields; Rachel M Gustafson; Kristyn Felman; Wendy Newdick; Rachel SanPedro; Suzanne Mackenzie; Jennifer Q Morse; Chung-Chou H Chang; Mary Beth Happ; Mi-Kyung Song; Jeremy M Kahn; Charles F Reynolds; Derek C Angus; Seth Landefeld; Douglas B White
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2018-09

10.  Triggers in advanced neurological conditions: prediction and management of the terminal phase.

Authors:  Jamilla Hussain; Debi Adams; Victoria Allgar; Colin Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.