| Literature DB >> 35592554 |
Helena Fernandes1,2, José Manuel Salgado2,3, Marta Ferreira3, Martina Vršanská4, Nélson Fernandes1, Carolina Castro1,2, Aires Oliva-Teles1, Helena Peres1,2, Isabel Belo3.
Abstract
Brewer's spent grain (BSG) is the main brewery industry by-product, with potential applications in the feed and food industries due to its carbohydrate composition. In addition, the lignocellulosic nature of BSG makes it an adequate substrate for carbohydrases production. In this work, solid-state fermentation (SSF) of BSG was performed with Aspergillus ibericus, a non-mycotoxin producer fungus with a high capacity to hydrolyze the lignocellulosic matrix of the agro-industrial by-products. SSF was performed at different scales to produce a crude extract rich in cellulase and xylanase. The potential of the crude extract was tested in two different applications: -(1) - the enzymatic hydrolysis of the fermented BSG and (2) - as a supplement in aquafeeds. SSF of BSG increased the protein content from 25% to 29% (w/w), while the fiber content was reduced to 43%, and cellulose and hemicellulose contents were markedly reduced to around 15%. The scale-up of SSF from 10 g of dry BSG in flasks to 50 g or 400 g in tray-type bioreactors increased 55% and 25% production of cellulase and xylanase, up to 323 and 1073 U g-1 BSG, respectively. The optimum temperature and pH of maximal activities were found to be 55°C and pH 4.4 for xylanase and 50°C and pH 3.9 for cellulase, cellulase being more thermostable than xylanase when exposed at temperatures from 45°C to 60°C. A Box-Behnken factorial design was applied to optimize the hydrolysis of the fermented BSG by crude extract. The crude extract load was a significant factor in sugars release, highlighting the role of hydrolytic enzymes, while the load of fermented BSG, and addition of a commercial β-glucosidase were responsible for the highest phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity release. The lyophilized crude extract (12,400 and 1050 U g-1 lyophilized extract of xylanase and cellulase, respectively) was also tested as an enzyme supplement in aquafeed for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles. The dietary supplementation with the crude extract significantly improved feed and protein utilization. The processing of BSG using biological treatments, such as SSF with A. ibericus, led to the production of a nutritionally enriched BSG and a crude extract with highly efficient carbohydrases capable of hydrolyzing lignocellulosic substrates, such as BSG, and with the potential to be used as feed enzymes with remarkable results in improving feed utilization of an important aquaculture fish species.Entities:
Keywords: aquaculture; brewer’s spent grain; carbohydrases; enzymatic hydrolysis; solid-state fermentation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35592554 PMCID: PMC9110835 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.732948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of the production of a crude extract from solid-state fermentation of brewer’s spent grain with A. ibericus and its application to further hydrolyze the fermented BSG and as an aquafeed enzyme supplement.
Proximal composition of BSG before and after the SSF by A. ibericus in 500-ml cotton-plugged Erlenmeyer flasks followed by aqueous extraction (mean ± standard deviation) and percentage of mass variation of each component.
| Compound (% w/w dry basis) | Unfermented BSG | BSGEF | Mass variation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25.30 ± 0.02a | 29.31 ± 0.31b | 25 |
| Fiber | 59.94 ± 2.01b | 43.30 ± 0.30a | 53 |
| Cellulose | 21.16 ± 0.99b | 14.73 ± 0.39a | 55 |
| Hemicellulose | 23.77 ± 1.4b | 15.29 ± 0.2a | 58 |
| Lignin | 15.01 ± 0.41a | 13.28 ± 0.72a | 42 |
.
Means in the same row and different superscript letters are significantly different (Tukey's test, p<0.05).
Matrix of the experimental design and identification of the different conditions applied in each experiment. Each variable and coded levels used in the Box–Behnken experimental design matrix are identified. Values are present as the mean [X1–crude extract; X2–load of BSGEF; X3–commercial β-glucosidase; TPV–total phenols variation; AAV–antioxidant activity variations; RS–released sugars; pentoses (xylose + arabinose)].
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Runs | X1 | X2 | X3 | TPV (mg GAE g−1) | AAV (µmol TE g−1) | RS (mg g−1) | Glucose (mg g−1) | Pentoses (mg g−1) | ||
|
| 1 | 0 | −1 | 10.42 ± 0.50 | 16.06 ± 0.86 | 32.11 ± 1.61 | 17.03 | 15.08 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.61 ± 0.48 | 42.52 ± 8.84 | 35.26 ± 1.76 | 18.17 | 17.09 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.67 ± 0.72 | 42.36 ± 1.32 | 38.25 ± 1.91 | 19.54 | 18.7 | ||
|
| −1 | 0 | −1 | 8.18 ± 0.41 | 30.46 ± 2.20 | 16.82 ± 0.84 | 11.66 | 5.17 | ||
|
| 1 | −1 | 0 | 18.92 ± 0.66 | 59.22 ± 13.77 | 30.82 ± 1.54 | 17.14 | 13.68 | ||
|
| 0 | −1 | −1 | 49.30 ± 0.25 | 28.79 ± 0.82 | 65.5 ± 3.06 | 27.43 | 33.83 | ||
|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 12.19 ± 0.50 | 59.25 ± 3.45 | 18.99 ± 0.82 | 8.91 | 7.42 | ||
|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | 15.11 ± 2.02 | 41.06 ± 12.83 | 18.64 ± 0.93 | 9.60 | 9.04 | ||
|
| 0 | −1 | 1 | 42.87 ± 0.26 | 83.48 ± 5.61 | 34.13 ± 1.71 | 18.0 | 16.13 | ||
|
| −1 | −1 | 0 | 29.47 ± 2.96 | 56.83 ± 12.29 | 27.42 ± 1.37 | 13.72 | 13.71 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.04 ± 2.48 | 32.08 ± 3.29 | 36.8 ± 0.66 | 13.72 | 3.58 | ||
|
| −1 | 1 | 0 | 8.89 ± 0.92 | 3.98 ± 1.61 | 9.76 ± 0.49 | 9.6 | 3.46 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.11 ± 0.32 | 0.81 ± 3.29 | 14.72 ± 0.74 | 7.5 | 4.86 | ||
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.76 ± 0.45 | −4.54 ± 0.82 | 18.07 ± 0.9 | 12.0 | 6.07 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | −1 | 8.29 ± 0.63 | −0.66 ± 1.41 | 21.2 ± 1.06 | 13.72 | 7.49 | ||
50 U g−1 of cellulase activity corresponds to 165.1 U g−1 xylanase activity and 1.06 U g−1 of β-glucosidase.
FIGURE 2Xylanase and cellulase activities obtained by the SSF at different scales (black—10 g, dark gray—50 g, and light gray—400 g of dry BSG). Treatments without a common letter are statistically different (Tukey’s test; p < 0.05). Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of two (10 g and 50 g of dry BSG) and three (400 g of dry BSG) independent replicates.
FIGURE 3Effect of temperature on xylanase (■) and cellulase (•) activities. Asterisks represent the interval of temperatures and pH in which no statistical differences were detected (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05) for xylanase (*) and cellulase activities (**). Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of two independent replicates.
FIGURE 4Effect of pH on xylanase (■) and cellulase (•) activities. Asterisks represent the interval of temperatures and pH in which no statistical differences were detected (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05) for xylanase (*) and cellulase activities (**). Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of two independent replicates.
FIGURE 5Thermal stability of xylanase and cellulase obtained after the solid-state fermentation of BSG at 45 °C (▲), 50 °C (•), and 60 °C (■). Xylanase and cellulase activities are represented by black and gray symbols, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of two independent replicates.
Quantitative model assessment tools (TPV—total phenol variation; AAV—antioxidant activity variations; RS—released sugars).
| Tools |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TPV | AAV | RS | |
|
| 0.9981 | 0.9924 | 0.9981 |
|
| 0.9924 | 0.9471 | 0.978 |
| F-value | 85.91 | 21.88 | 89.76 |
| Significance level | 98.84 | 95.55 | 98.89 |
FIGURE 6Surface response for the dependent variables: (A) antioxidant activity variation (AAV); (B) total phenols variation (TPV); and (C) total sugars.
Growth performance and feed utilization of the European seabass juveniles fed with the experimental diets for 64 days*.
| Diets | Control | CE0.1 | CE0.4 | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 22.00 | 22.01 | 22.02 | 0.01 |
| Final body weight (g) | 35.08 | 35.67 | 36.78 | 0.51 |
| Weight gain (g kg−1 ABW day−1) | 8.95 | 9.29 | 9.84 | 0.27 |
| Daily growth index | 0.92 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 0.03 |
| Feed intake (g kg−1 ABW day−1) | 13.73 | 12.59 | 11.36 | 0.56 |
| Feed efficiency | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.04 |
| Protein efficiency ratio | 1.36 | 1.54 | 1.80 | 0.08 |
| Nitrogen retention (g kg−1 ABW day−1) | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.01 |
| Nitrogen retention (% NI) | 22.64 | 25.71 | 26.84 | 0.99 |
| Energy retention (kJ kg−1 ABW day−1) | 72.48 | 64.45 | 80.86 | 5.89 |
| Energy retention (% EI) | 22.02 | 21.24 | 29.14 | 1.87 |
*Values are presented as the mean (n = 3) and standard error of the mean (SEM). Values in the same row and different superscript letters are significantly different (Tukey’ test; p < 0.05).
Average body weight (ABW) = ((initial body weight, IBW + final body weight, FBW)/2).
Weight gain = (FBW-IBW ×1,000)/(ABW × time in days).
Daily growth index = (FBW1/3 - IBW1/3)/time in days) ×100.
Feed efficiency = wet weight gain/dry feed intake.
Protein efficiency ratio = wet weight gain/dry protein intake.
Nitrogen retention (g/kg ABW/day) = ((FBW×FBN − IBW×IBN) ×1,000)/(ABW × time in days); IBN and FBN: initial and final nitrogen content.
Energy retention (g/kg ABW/day) = ((FBW×FBE − IBW×IBE) ×1,000)/(ABW × time in days); IBE and FBN: initial and final energy content.
Energy retention (% energy intake) = whole-body energy retention/energy intake; EI) ×100.
Phenolics yield obtained after different pretreatments of BSG reported in the present work and other studies.
| Treatment | Conditions | Phenolic yield | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| SSF | 2 g BSG, 7 days, 25°C, | 2 mg GAE g−1 |
|
| Alkaline | 2 g BSG, NaOH 2 M, 4 h, 65°C | 16.2 mg GAE g−1 |
|
| Acidic | 0.2 g BSG, methanol and Sulphur acid, 20 h, 85°C | 30 mg GAE g−1 |
|
| Ultra-sounds | 20 kHz, 1 h, 47°C | 3.3 mg GAE g−1 |
|
| Organic solvents | 2 g BSG, methanol, ethanol, or acetone, 30 min | 1.2 mg GAE g−1 |
|
| Enzymatic hydrolysis | 10–100 µl carbohydrases g−1 dry BSG, 4 h or 9 h, 50°C | 0.56 mg GAE g−1 |
|
| Enzymatic hydrolysis | 50 U cellulase g−1 dry BSGEF, 72 h, 45°C | 49.2 mg GAE g−1 | Present work |