| Literature DB >> 35592296 |
Ying Wang1,2, Xuetao Chen3, Ping Zhao2, Lu Ren2, Xia Li2, Wenyuan Gao2.
Abstract
This study compared the physicochemical characteristics and immunomodulatory activities of chrysanthemums' polysaccharides (JPs) from five cultivars. Significant differences were found in the molecular weights, the ratios of monosaccharide compositions, and morphological properties. Polysaccharides of Gongju (GJP) had the lowest molecular weight populations and polysaccharides of Boju (BJP) had the highest. SEM showed that GJP and polysaccharides of Qiju had looser and uniform surface structures, which are beneficial for being developed into instant products. Immunoregulatory assay revealed that JPs enhanced the phagocytosis and proliferation of RAW264.7 cells without obvious cytotoxicity, and upregulated the release level of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and NO. Immune-enhancing activity correlated with their molecular weights, the contents of glucuronic acid and arabinose, and microstructure, which performed differently according to different cultivars. The results suggested that BJP and polysaccharides of Hangbaiju are more suitable to be developed as new functional foods for enhancing immunity, and provided a reference for selection based on the immunization requirements.Entities:
Keywords: chrysanthemums; immunomodulatory activities; physicochemical characteristics; polysaccharides
Year: 2022 PMID: 35592296 PMCID: PMC9094477 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 3.553
The yield, total polysaccharides, protein, molecular weight, and monosaccharide composition of BJP, GJP, HJP, QJP, and HBJP
| Samples | HJP | QJP | HBJP | BJP | GJP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield (%) | 8.11 | 6.43 | 11.05 | 9.53 | 7.51 |
| TP (%) | 51.45 ± 2.40b | 53.42 ± 1.85c | 54.69 ± 1.74c | 60.47 ± 2.01d | 49.48 ± 1.81a |
| Protein (%) | 6.02 ± 0.59a | 6.30 ± 0.34a | 7.16 ± 0.24b | 7.14 ± 0.42b | 7.48 ± 0.45b |
| Mw (kDa) | 2106.09 | 1179.38 | 1000.70 | 2391.36 | 60.08 |
| 412.82 | 204.50 | 210.46 | 40.33 | 8.52 | |
| 59.78 | 73.13 | 91.51 | 2.29 | ||
| Sugar composition | |||||
| Man (%) | 11.82 ± 0.40c | 7.43 ± 0.83b | 3.42 ± 0.11a | 3.82 ± 0.30a | 6.86 ± 0.36b |
| Rha (%) | 4.36 ± 0.23b | 4.56 ± 0.16b | 23.30 ± 1.02c | 2.99 ± 0.15a | 4.22 ± 0.21b |
| GalA (%) | 9.87 ± 0.15c | 4.79 ± 0.32a | 34.14 ± 1.24d | 6.79 ± 0.21b | 4.61 ± 0.13ab |
| Glc (%) | 60.08 ± 2.49d | 36.09 ± 0.25b | 7.53 ± 0.46a | 66.63 ± 2.93e | 47.81 ± 2.17c |
| Gal (%) | 7.53 ± 0.22a | 14.89 ± 0.19d | 8.87 ± 0.41b | 9.73 ± 0.51c | 10.37 ± 0.22c |
| Ara (%) | 6.34 ± 0.45a | 32.25 ± 2.13e | 22.74 ± 2.06c | 10.04 ± 0.95b | 26.14 ± 1.96d |
Different letters within the same substance show significant difference at p < .05. The results are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3).
FIGURE 1(a) UV spectra, (b) Monosaccharide composition analysis of BJP, GJP, HJP, QJP, and HBJP
FIGURE 2FT‐IR spectra of BJP, GJP, HJP, QJP, and HBJP
FIGURE 3SEM of BJP, GJP, HJP, QJP, and HBJP (left: ×1000; right: ×10,000)
FIGURE 4(a) Effect of JPs on vitality of RAW264.7 cells. (b) Effect of JPs on the phagocytic capacity. Effect of JPs on TNF‐α (c), IFN‐γ (d), and NO (e) release. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 versus the blank control.