| Literature DB >> 35591018 |
Jan Verstockt1, Simon Verspeek1, Filip Thiessen2, Wiebren A Tjalma3, Lieve Brochez4, Gunther Steenackers1.
Abstract
Infrared thermography technology has improved dramatically in recent years and is gaining renewed interest in the medical community for applications in skin tissue identification applications. However, there is still a need for an optimized measurement setup and protocol to obtain the most appropriate images for decision making and further processing. Nowadays, various cooling methods, measurement setups and cameras are used, but a general optimized cooling and measurement protocol has not been defined yet. In this literature review, an overview of different measurement setups, thermal excitation techniques and infrared camera equipment is given. It is possible to improve thermal images of skin lesions by choosing an appropriate cooling method, infrared camera and optimized measurement setup.Entities:
Keywords: cooling setup; infrared camera; infrared thermography; measurement setup; skin cancer; skin lesion
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591018 PMCID: PMC9100961 DOI: 10.3390/s22093327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Radiance of blackbodies for various temperatures.
Figure 2The electromagnetic spectrum with a subdivision for infrared wavelengths.
Figure 3Lock-in (a) Lock-in device. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [62]. 2014, John Wiley & Sons A/S; (b) Description of lock-in setup. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [62]. 2014, John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Figure 4The spectral range of different IR detectors in relation to the spectral radiance of a blackbody at different equilibrium temperatures. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [13]. 2016, Elsevier.
Overview of included research in this review manuscript.
| Title | Authors | Year | Measurement Method | Analysis Scheme | Lesion types | Other Diagnosis Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buzug et al. | 2006 | Quantitative | Active thermography | 1 Basal-cell carcinoma | histopathology | |
|
| Santa Cruz et al. | 2009 | Quantitative | Active thermography | 2 Malignant Melanoma | CT |
| Cetingül et al. | 2011 | Quantitative | Active thermography | 37 dysplastic nevi of | Bright light image | |
| Flores-Sahagun et al. | 2011 | Quantitative | Passive thermography | 7 basal cell carcinoma | Bright light image | |
| Shada et al. | 2013 | Quantitative | Passive thermography | 123 nonmelanomas | N/A | |
| Bonmarin et al. | 2015 | Quantitative | Lock-in thermography | 2 benign lesions | RGB image | |
| Godoy et al. | 2015 | Quantitative | Active thermography | 59 benign lesions | RGB image | |
|
| Stringasci et al. | 2018 | Quantitative | Passive thermography | 100 Basal-cell carcinoma | RGB image |
| Magalhaes et al. | 2019 | Quantitative | Active thermography | 51 Squamous cell carcinoma | N/A |
Acquisition protocols used in literature.
| Author | Passive/Active | Acclimatization | Controlled | Steady State | Cooling | Cooling | Cooling | Cooling | Cooling | Rewarming | Number of | Camera Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Active | / | / | / | Direct contact | Cooled | 20 °C | 10 cm × 10 cm | / | 300 | 300 | Directly in front |
|
| Active | 15–20 min | / | 30 s | 1. Convection | 1. immersion in water | 1. 15 °C | / | 1. 120 s | 180 | / | 1.5 m and 3 m |
|
| Active | / | 22 °C | 1 image | Convection | vortex tube | / | / | 60 s | 180–240 | 90–120 | 30 cm |
|
| Passive | / | / | / | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1 m |
|
| Passive | / | / | ± 14 min | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | / |
|
| Active | / | 20–22 °C | 15 s | 1. Convection | 1. vortex tube | / | 15–110 s | 120 s | 7200 | / | |
|
| Passive | 10 min | 22 °C | 1 image | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 15 cm |
|
| Active | 10 min | 21 ± °C | 1 image | Direct contact | Aluminum medal | / | 50 mm | 60 s | 300 | 5 | / |
Figure 5IR camera with macro lens placed on a tripod. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [27]. 2006, ACTA Press.
Figure 6Region of interest markers for IR thermography on skin lesions used in literature. (a) Type of markers used by Buzug et al. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [27]. 2006, ACTA Press. (b) Square marker by Godoy et al. Adapted with permission from Ref. [9]. 2017, Optical Society of America. (c) Triangulated markers by Shada et al. Adapted with permission from Ref. [98]. 2013, Elsevier. (d) Square marker by Cetingül et al. Adapted with permission from Ref. [12]. 2011, JoVE.
Infrared Cameras used in previous research.
| Author | Buzug et al. | Santa Cruz et al. | Cetingül et al. | Flores-Sahagun et al. | Shada et al. | Godoy et al. | Inostroza et al. | Stringasci et al. | Diaz et al. | Magalhaes et al. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| FLIR SC3000 | Raytheon Palm IR 250 | Merlin Midwave | SAT-S160 | Raytheon Amber | / | FLIR Tau 2 | Fluke FLK-Ti400 | ThermApp | FLIR E60sc |
|
| QWIP FPA | Uncooled Ferroelectric | InSb FPA | Uncooled | InSb FPA | QWIP FPA | Uncooled | Uncooled | Uncooled | Uncooled |
|
| 320 × 240 | 320 × 240 | 320 × 256 | 160 × 120 | 256 × 256 | 320 × 256 | 640 × 512 | 320 × 240 | 384 × 288 | 320 × 240 |
|
| 8–9 | 7–14 | 3–5 | 8–14 | 3–5 | 8–14 | 7.5–13.5 | 7.5–14 | 7.5–14 | 7.5–13 |
|
| LWIR | LWIR | MWIR | LWIR | MWIR | LWIR | LWIR | LWIR | LWIR | LWIR |
|
| ±1% | / | ±2 % | ±2% | / | / | / | ±2% | ±2% | ±2% |
|
| 20 mK at | / | 25 mK at | 100 mK at | / | 20 mK at | 60 mK at | 50 mK at | 70 mK at | <50 mK at |
|
| 50/60 | 30 | 60 | 50/60 | / | 60 | 30 | 60 | 25 | / |
|
| Macro lens | 75 mm Germanium lens | / | / | / | 50 mm, f/2 | / | / | / | / |
|
| Fixed | Handheld | Fixed | Handheld | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed | Handheld | Handheld | Handheld |
|
| / | Double-cavity | Black body calibration | / | / | two-point NUC | / | / | / | Black body calibration |