| Literature DB >> 36141650 |
Kamil Bryś1, Beniamin Oskar Grabarek1, Piotr Król2, Rafał Staszkiewicz1,3, Magdalena Wierzbik-Strońska4, Tomasz Król5.
Abstract
Diathermy is a method used in physiotherapy based on obtaining an increase in temperature by supplying energy from the electromagnetic field to the tissues. The aim of this retrospective work, based on the data included in a medical documentation, was to assess the dynamics of temperature changes on the body surface after the application of a high-frequency electromagnetic field depending on the type of electrode used. In order to generate a radio frequency electromagnetic field, an INDIBA ACTIV® CT9 was used. In order to measure the temperature, an HT-17 thermovision camera was used, enabling measurements within the range of -20 to 300 °C, with an accuracy of ±2% or 2 °C. The participants consisted of 30 healthy subjects (15 women and 15 men) who were physiotherapy students in the Faculty of Public Health in the Silesian Medical University in Katowice, Poland; they were divided into two comparative groups (A and B). It was found that the differences between the groups were not significant in the measurements carried out before using the electrode (p = 0.84; Mann-Whitney U test). On the other hand, at 0, 5 and 15 min, statistically significant differences were noted in the tissue temperature between the groups, depending on the electrode used (p = 0.00; Mann-Whitney U test). Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that with the extension of the observation time, the tissue temperature increased (for Group A, Me 30.40 °C vs. 34.90 °C; for Group B, Me 30.70 °C vs. 35.20 °C). Our study confirmed that the use of both a capacitive and resistive electrode during treatment with the use of a high-frequency electromagnetic field statistically significantly increased the surface temperature of the area to which the therapy was applied. The results of the study can be used in clinical practice by physiotherapists to optimize the conditions of therapy.Entities:
Keywords: capacitive electrode; diathermy; physiotherapy; resistive electrode; tissue temperature
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36141650 PMCID: PMC9517109 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Anthropometric data of participants.
| Group A ( | Group A ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex (men; women) | 7; 8 | 8; 7 |
| Age (years) | 24 ± 0.5 | 24 ± 1.1 |
| Weight (kg) | 75 ± 15.4 | 73.9 ± 16.5 |
| Growth (cm) | 174 ± 10.1 | 172 ± 7.8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.6 ± 4.5 | 24.9 ± 4.26 |
| Fat tissue (%) | 14.98 ± 2.19 | 15.11 ± 1.76 |
BMI, Body Mass Index.
Figure 1The procedure for selecting participants’ medical records that were finally analyzed.
Figure 2The method of determining the studied area (own picture).
Figure 3Procedure for the use of high-frequency electromagnetic field and thermal imaging of the area under examination.
Figure 4Results of measurements with a thermovision camera (own source).
Tissue temperature at individual time intervals depending on the electrode used.
| Group | Time | Median (°C) | Lower Quartile (°C) | Upper Quartile (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | before | 30.40 | 30.20 | 30.70 | 0.84 |
| B | 30.30 | 30.00 | 31.00 | ||
| A | 0 min | 36.30 | 35.90 | 36.90 | <0.00 |
| B | 38.60 | 38.20 | 39.10 | ||
| A | 5 min | 34.80 | 33.90 | 35.40 | <0.00 |
| B | 36.00 | 35.40 | 36.80 | ||
| A | 15 min | 33.50 | 32.90 | 34.40 | <0.00 |
| B | 34.90 | 34.20 | 35.20 |
Group A, participants who used a capacitive electrode; Group B, participants who used a resistive electrode.
Results of the post hoc Friedman ANOVA test for Groups A and B (p < 0.05).
| Time | Before | 0 Min | 5 Min | 15 Min |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | 0.00 1,2 | 0.00 1,2 | 0.00 1,2 | |
| 0 min | 0.00 1,2 | 0.00 1,2 | 0.00 1,2 | |
| 5 min | 0.00 1,2 | 0.00 1,2 | 0.00 1,2 | |
| 15 min | 0.00 1,2 | 0.00 1,2 | 0.00 1,2 |
1 Results of Friedman ANOVA post hoc test for Group A, participants who used a capacitive electrode; 2 results of Friedman ANOVA post hoc test for Group B, participants who used a resistive electrode.
Figure 5Changes in tissue temperature values as a result of using a capacitive electrode.
Figure 6Changes in tissue temperature during the conducted observations after the use of a resistive electrode.
The value of skin moisture in participant of Groups A and B at different observation times.
| Time | Group A | Group B | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Lower Quartile | Upper Quartile | Median | Lower Quartile | Upper Quartile | |||
|
| 64.98 | 63.19 | 65.76 | 65.13 | 64.23 | 66.18 | 0.97 1 | 0.96 1 |
|
| 65.17 | 64.21 | 66.11 | 64.98 | 64.01 | 66.11 | 0.94 1 | |
|
| 64.99 | 64.01 | 66.91 | 65.11 | 64.12 | 65.76 | 0.93 1 | |
|
| 64.12 | 63.18 | 65.13 | 65.19 | 64.97 | 66.12 | 0.95 1 | |
Group A, participants who used a capacitive electrode; Group B, participants who used a resistive electrode; 1 p-value obtained by Friedman ANOVA test for Group A; 2 p-value obtained by Friedman ANOVA test for Group B.