Literature DB >> 17462678

Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation.

Moshe Bar1, Maital Neta.   

Abstract

What are the basic visual cues that determine our preference towards mundane everyday objects? We previously showed that a highly potent cue is the nature of the object's contour: people generally like objects with a curved contour compared with objects that have pointed features and a sharp-angled contour. This bias is hypothesized here to stem from an implicit perception of potential threat conveyed by sharp elements. Using human neuroimaging to test this hypothesis, we report that the amygdala, a brain structure that is involved in fear processing and has been shown to exhibit activation level that is proportional to arousal in general, is significantly more active for everyday sharp objects (e.g., a sofa with sharp corners) compared with their curved contour counterparts. Therefore, our results indicate that a preference bias towards a visual object can be induced by low-level perceptual properties, independent of semantic meaning, via visual elements that on some level could be associated with threat. We further present behavioral results that provide initial support for the link between the sharpness of the contour and threat perception. Our brains might be organized to extract these basic contour elements rapidly for deriving an early warning signal in the presence of potential danger.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17462678      PMCID: PMC4024389          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  30 in total

1.  Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI.

Authors:  A M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?

Authors:  Rolf Reber; Norbert Schwarz; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2004

4.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention.

Authors:  Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning.

Authors:  Joseph J Paton; Marina A Belova; Sara E Morrison; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Humans prefer curved visual objects.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Maital Neta
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-08

8.  Very first impressions.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Maital Neta; Heather Linz
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-05

9.  Neural correlates of processing valence and arousal in affective words.

Authors:  P A Lewis; H D Critchley; P Rotshtein; R J Dolan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.

Authors:  Janine Willis; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-07
View more
  41 in total

1.  Parallel processing of general and specific threat during early stages of perception.

Authors:  Yuqi You; Wen Li
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Three-quarter views are subjectively good because object orientation is uncertain.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

3.  Feature-based representations of emotional facial expressions in the human amygdala.

Authors:  Fredrik Ahs; Caroline F Davis; Adam X Gorka; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture.

Authors:  Oshin Vartanian; Gorka Navarrete; Anjan Chatterjee; Lars Brorson Fich; Helmut Leder; Cristián Modroño; Marcos Nadal; Nicolai Rostrup; Martin Skov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Diagnosticity of Color for Emotional Objects.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Jasmine Radue; Joanna Trask; Kristin Huskamp; Daniel Kersten; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 6.  Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; Avniel S Ghuman; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Bottom-up and top-down emotion generation: implications for emotion regulation.

Authors:  Kateri McRae; Supriya Misra; Aditya K Prasad; Sean C Pereira; James J Gross
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Emotions in reading: Dissociation of happiness and positivity.

Authors:  Benny B Briesemeister; Lars Kuchinke; Arthur M Jacobs; Mario Braun
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Simple geometric shapes are implicitly associated with affective value.

Authors:  Christine L Larson; Joel Aronoff; Elizabeth L Steuer
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2011-10-19

Review 10.  Pleasure junkies all around! Why it matters and why 'the arts' might be the answer: a biopsychological perspective.

Authors:  Julia F Christensen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.