Literature DB >> 21477603

The neural time course of art perception: an ERP study on the processing of style versus content in art.

M Dorothee Augustin1, Birgit Defranceschi, Helene K Fuchs, Claus-Christian Carbon, Florian Hutzler.   

Abstract

A central prerequisite to understand the phenomenon of art in psychological terms is to investigate the nature of the underlying perceptual and cognitive processes. Building on a study by Augustin, Leder, Hutzler, and Carbon (2008) the current ERP study examined the neural time course of two central aspects of representational art, one of which is closely related to object- and scene perception, the other of which is art-specific: content and style. We adapted a paradigm that has repeatedly been employed in psycholinguistics and that allows one to examine the neural time course of two processes in terms of when sufficient information is available to allow successful classification. Twenty-two participants viewed pictures that systematically varied in style and content and conducted a combined go/nogo dual choice task. The dependent variables of interest were the Lateralised Readiness Potential (LRP) and the N200 effect. Analyses of both measures support the notion that in the processing of art style follows content, with style-related information being available at around 224 ms or between 40 and 94 ms later than content-related information. The paradigm used here offers a promising approach to further explore the time course of art perception, thus helping to unravel the perceptual and cognitive processes that underlie the phenomenon of art and the fascination it exerts.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21477603     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

Review 1.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

2.  What does the brain tell us about abstract art?

Authors:  Vered Aviv
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.

Authors:  Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Art expertise modulates the emotional response to modern art, especially abstract: an ERP investigation.

Authors:  Jane E Else; Jason Ellis; Elizabeth Orme
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  The Ambiguity of Artworks -A Guideline for Empirical Aesthetics Research with Artworks as Stimuli.

Authors:  Gregor U Hayn-Leichsenring
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-24

7.  How Is the Neural Response to the Design of Experience Goods Related to Personalized Preference? An Implicit View.

Authors:  Yongbin Ma; Jia Jin; Wenjun Yu; Wuke Zhang; Zhijiang Xu; Qingguo Ma
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The Power of Shape: How Shape of Node-Link Diagrams Impacts Aesthetic Appreciation and Triggers Interest.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon; Tamara Mchedlidze; Marius Hans Raab; Hannes Wächter
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-09-08

9.  Gist Perception of Image Composition in Abstract Artworks.

Authors:  Kana Schwabe; Claudia Menzel; Caitlin Mullin; Johan Wagemans; Christoph Redies
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-06-13

10.  On the Role of Mentalizing Processes in Aesthetic Appreciation: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Susan Beudt; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.