Literature DB >> 35589843

People construct simplified mental representations to plan.

Mark K Ho1,2, David Abel3,4, Carlos G Correa5, Michael L Littman3, Jonathan D Cohen6,5, Thomas L Griffiths6,7.   

Abstract

One of the most striking features of human cognition is the ability to plan. Two aspects of human planning stand out-its efficiency and flexibility. Efficiency is especially impressive because plans must often be made in complex environments, and yet people successfully plan solutions to many everyday problems despite having limited cognitive resources1-3. Standard accounts in psychology, economics and artificial intelligence have suggested that human planning succeeds because people have a complete representation of a task and then use heuristics to plan future actions in that representation4-11. However, this approach generally assumes that task representations are fixed. Here we propose that task representations can be controlled and that such control provides opportunities to quickly simplify problems and more easily reason about them. We propose a computational account of this simplification process and, in a series of preregistered behavioural experiments, show that it is subject to online cognitive control12-14 and that people optimally balance the complexity of a task representation and its utility for planning and acting. These results demonstrate how strategically perceiving and conceiving problems facilitates the effective use of limited cognitive resources.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35589843     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04743-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   69.504


  29 in total

Review 1.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.

Authors:  E K Miller; J D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Rational use of cognitive resources: levels of analysis between the computational and the algorithmic.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; Falk Lieder; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 4.  Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Eric J Horvitz; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Adaptive integration of habits into depth-limited planning defines a habitual-goal-directed spectrum.

Authors:  Mehdi Keramati; Peter Smittenaar; Raymond J Dolan; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Computational rationality: linking mechanism and behavior through bounded utility maximization.

Authors:  Richard L Lewis; Andrew Howes; Satinder Singh
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-20

7.  Interplay of approximate planning strategies.

Authors:  Quentin J M Huys; Níall Lally; Paul Faulkner; Neir Eshel; Erich Seifritz; Samuel J Gershman; Peter Dayan; Jonathan P Roiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Rational use of cognitive resources in human planning.

Authors:  Frederick Callaway; Bas van Opheusden; Sayan Gul; Priyam Das; Paul M Krueger; Thomas L Griffiths; Falk Lieder
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-04-28

9.  Bonsai trees in your head: how the pavlovian system sculpts goal-directed choices by pruning decision trees.

Authors:  Quentin J M Huys; Neir Eshel; Elizabeth O'Nions; Luke Sheridan; Peter Dayan; Jonathan P Roiser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Optimizing the depth and the direction of prospective planning using information values.

Authors:  Can Eren Sezener; Amir Dezfouli; Mehdi Keramati
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.