Literature DB >> 26185246

Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines.

Samuel J Gershman1, Eric J Horvitz2, Joshua B Tenenbaum3.   

Abstract

After growing up together, and mostly growing apart in the second half of the 20th century, the fields of artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive science, and neuroscience are reconverging on a shared view of the computational foundations of intelligence that promotes valuable cross-disciplinary exchanges on questions, methods, and results. We chart advances over the past several decades that address challenges of perception and action under uncertainty through the lens of computation. Advances include the development of representations and inferential procedures for large-scale probabilistic inference and machinery for enabling reflection and decisions about tradeoffs in effort, precision, and timeliness of computations. These tools are deployed toward the goal of computational rationality: identifying decisions with highest expected utility, while taking into consideration the costs of computation in complex real-world problems in which most relevant calculations can only be approximated. We highlight key concepts with examples that show the potential for interchange between computer science, cognitive science, and neuroscience.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26185246     DOI: 10.1126/science.aac6076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  71 in total

Review 1.  Constraint methods that accelerate free-energy simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Justin L MacCallum; Evangelos A Coutsias; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Predictive cues reduce but do not eliminate intrinsic response bias.

Authors:  Mingjia Hu; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

3.  An oscillatory neural network model that demonstrates the benefits of multisensory learning.

Authors:  A Ravishankar Rao
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 4.  Predictive mechanisms linking brain opioids to chronic pain vulnerability and resilience.

Authors:  Anthony Kenneth Peter Jones; Christopher Andrew Brown
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Addiction beyond pharmacological effects: The role of environment complexity and bounded rationality.

Authors:  Dimitri Ognibene; Vincenzo G Fiore; Xiaosi Gu
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2019-05-08

6.  Rational thoughts in neural codes.

Authors:  Zhengwei Wu; Minhae Kwon; Saurabh Daptardar; Paul Schrater; Xaq Pitkow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Quentin J M Huys; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

Review 8.  Cognitive computational neuroscience.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Pamela K Douglas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Deliberating trade-offs with the future.

Authors:  Adam Bulley; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-17

10.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.