Literature DB >> 24648415

Computational rationality: linking mechanism and behavior through bounded utility maximization.

Richard L Lewis1, Andrew Howes, Satinder Singh.   

Abstract

We propose a framework for including information-processing bounds in rational analyses. It is an application of bounded optimality (Russell & Subramanian, 1995) to the challenges of developing theories of mechanism and behavior. The framework is based on the idea that behaviors are generated by cognitive mechanisms that are adapted to the structure of not only the environment but also the mind and brain itself. We call the framework computational rationality to emphasize the incorporation of computational mechanism into the definition of rational action. Theories are specified as optimal program problems, defined by an adaptation environment, a bounded machine, and a utility function. Such theories yield different classes of explanation, depending on the extent to which they emphasize adaptation to bounds, and adaptation to some ecology that differs from the immediate local environment. We illustrate this variation with examples from three domains: visual attention in a linguistic task, manual response ordering, and reasoning. We explore the relation of this framework to existing "levels" approaches to explanation, and to other optimality-based modeling approaches.
Copyright © 2014 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Keywords:  Bounded optimality; Bounded rationality; Cognitive architecture; Cognitive modeling; Rational analysis; Rationality; Utility maximization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24648415     DOI: 10.1111/tops.12086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  20 in total

Review 1.  The algorithmic anatomy of model-based evaluation.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Daw; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Learning Additional Languages as Hierarchical Probabilistic Inference: Insights From First Language Processing.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Alex B Fine; Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2016-03-14

Review 3.  The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Quentin J M Huys; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  People construct simplified mental representations to plan.

Authors:  Mark K Ho; David Abel; Carlos G Correa; Michael L Littman; Jonathan D Cohen; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  Rational use of cognitive resources in human planning.

Authors:  Frederick Callaway; Bas van Opheusden; Sayan Gul; Priyam Das; Paul M Krueger; Thomas L Griffiths; Falk Lieder
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-04-28

6.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Bounded Rational Decision-Making from Elementary Computations That Reduce Uncertainty.

Authors:  Sebastian Gottwald; Daniel A Braun
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  Meta-control of the exploration-exploitation dilemma emerges from probabilistic inference over a hierarchy of time scales.

Authors:  Dimitrije Marković; Thomas Goschke; Stefan J Kiebel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Heuristics contribute to sensorimotor decision-making under risk.

Authors:  Tyler Adkins; Richard Lewis; Taraz Lee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-09-10

10.  Strategic Adaptation to Task Characteristics, Incentives, and Individual Differences in Dual-Tasking.

Authors:  Christian P Janssen; Duncan P Brumby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.