Literature DB >> 35581287

Chromatin structure predicts survival in glioma patients.

Matthew C Garrett1, Rebecca Albano2, Troy Carnwath3, Sanjit Shah2, Daniel Woo4, Michael Lamba5, David R Plas6, Aditi Paranjpe7, Krishna Roskin7, Chuntao Zhao8, Richard Lu8.   

Abstract

The pathological changes in epigenetics and gene regulation that accompany the progression of low-grade to high-grade gliomas are under-studied. The authors use a large set of paired atac-seq and RNA-seq data from surgically resected glioma specimens to infer gene regulatory relationships in glioma. Thirty-eight glioma patient samples underwent atac-seq sequencing and 16 samples underwent additional RNA-seq analysis. Using an atac-seq/RNA-seq correlation matrix, atac-seq peaks were paired with genes based on high correlation values (|r2| > 0.6). Samples clustered by IDH1 status but not by grade. Surprisingly there was a trend for IDH1 mutant samples to have more peaks. The majority of peaks are positively correlated with survival and positively correlated with gene expression. Constructing a model of the top six atac-seq peaks created a highly accurate survival prediction model (r2 = 0.68). Four of these peaks were still significant after controlling for age, grade, pathology, IDH1 status and gender. Grade II, III, and IV (primary) samples have similar transcription factors and gene modules. However, grade IV (recurrent) samples have strikingly few peaks. Patient-derived glioma cultures showed decreased peak counts following radiation indicating that this may be radiation-induced. This study supports the notion that IDH1 mutant and IDH1 wildtype gliomas have different epigenetic landscapes and that accessible chromatin sites mapped by atac-seq peaks tend to be positively correlated with expression. The data in this study leads to a new model of treatment response wherein glioma cells respond to radiation therapy by closing open regions of DNA.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35581287      PMCID: PMC9114333          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11019-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


Introduction

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumor and result in over 15,000 deaths a year in the United States alone[1]. These tumors are often initially discovered as slow-growing low-grade gliomas (Grade II gliomas)[2,3]. However, inevitably these tumors undergo a transformation into faster growing more aggressive higher-grade tumors (Grade III and Grade IV gliomas). Following diagnosis, standard clinical management includes maximal safe resection and adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and radiation)[1,3-5]. This often leads to a period of clinical stability where there is no visible tumor on serial MRI scans. However, the tumors inevitably recur. While primary grade IV gliomas (i.e. glioblastomas) can have periods of stability following resection and adjuvant therapy, once they recur, recurrent glioblastomas are typically treatment resistant and clinical stability is rare[6,7]. Whether this is due to a natural progression of the tumor or as a response to typically used DNA-damaging therapies (radiation and chemotherapy) is being investigated[8]. The transformation from a normal cell to a low-grade glioma and eventually a high-grade glioma involves the dysregulation of many gene pathways and cellular processes[9,10]. Much attention has been paid to deletions (e.g. PTEN[11,12], p53[13], 1p/19q[14,15]) and amplifications (EGFR[16], MYC[17]) of specific gene regions that are frequently encountered in these tumors. However, there is a similar and equally important pathology in the epigenetic dysregulation of these gene pathways that has received less attention. A thorough exploration of the epigenetic landscape of these tumors may lead to the discovery of additional important biomarkers. The discovery of the IDH1 mutation (frequently found in low-grade gliomas and secondary high-grade gliomas) has brought additional focus and attention to the problem of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas. The presumed mechanism of the IDH1 mutation is to methylate cytosine nucleotides in DNA and induce a more closed inaccessible DNA chromatin with subsequent gene down-regulation[18-20] however atac-seq data on IDH1 mutant glioma samples is limited. Atac-seq is a relatively new sequencing technology that identifies open accessible DNA regions (e.g. “peaks”) with very little cellular input enabling the analysis of surgically resected samples. Its low-cost and relative ease has led to wide-spread use across multiple cell types. However, when atac-seq data is used in isolation without additional lines of supporting evidence, it has been difficult to determine how best to interpret the biological significance of these open regions (measured as “peaks” from aligned sequencing reads). Data sets involving multiple modalities (atac-seq and RNA-seq) on the same samples would be useful in supporting or refuting these assumptions. To address these short-comings this study combines a large set of atac-seq and RNA-seq data from surgically removed glioma specimens to create an atac-seq/RNA-seq matrix to identify highly correlated peaks and genes. By correlating these data sets with demographic and survival data we have identified open DNA regions that have prognostic and thereby likely biological significance.

Methods

Generation of clinical database

The University of Cincinnati maintains an IRB-approved biorepository of surgically resected specimens with associated clinical and demographic information including medical record number, diagnosis, name, gender, age, date of collection and survival. A collection of 38 specimens were chosen from the bio-repository with a goal to obtain a heterogenous mixture of low-grade and high-grade specimens as well as those with long and short survival. Specimens were between 2 and 9 years old prior to selection to allow for adequate follow-up for survival analysis. All specimens denoted as “Grade II,” “Grade III,” or “Grade IV primary” are taken from the patient’s initial surgery and have not been exposed to any chemotherapy or radiation treatment. All grades were assigned based on the WHO guidelines of that time. Since then, grading guidelines have changed to include more molecular markers (e.g. IDH1, p53, 1p/19q)[21]. Following the initial surgery all patients underwent standard therapy including temozolomide and radiation. Survival was calculated as time between surgical resection and death. The presence of the IDH1 mutation was determined via either immunostaining or by direct sequencing.

Protocol for generating Atac-seq libraries

Nuclei were isolated from patient tumor tissue as described by Habib et al.[22], with slight modifications. Briefly, frozen tissue samples (< 0.5 cm) were incubated on ice in 1 mL of Nuclei EZ Lysis Buffer (Sigma, #Nuc-101). The tissue was then homogenized using a glass tissue grinder. 1 mL of additional EZ Lysis Buffer was added, the tissue was incubated on ice for 5 min, and then filtered through a 70 μm cell strainer. Nuclei were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 1 mL ATAC-resuspension buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% Tween-20) and filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer. 1 mL of ATAC-resuspension buffer was then added and the nuclei were filtered through a 5 μm cell strainer. ATAC-seq library preparation was performed as previously described[23].

RNA-seq library creation

Frozen patient tumor tissue (< 0.5 cm) was placed into pre-chilled RNA-ice later (Invitrogen, #AM7030) for at least 24 h at − 20 °C. The tissue was then homogenized with Lysis/Binding Buffer (Invitrogen, #00671513) in lysing matrix D tubes (MP, #116913050-CF) for 40 s at 6 m/s, using the MP FastPrep-24 5G Instrument (MP, #116005500). RNA (≥ 200 nucleotides) was then purified using the Quick-RNA MiniPrep Plus Kit (Zymo Research, #R1057).

Processing of ATAC-seq data

ATAC-seq reads in FASTQ format were first subjected to quality control to assess the need for trimming of adapter sequences or bad quality segments. The programs used in these steps were FastQC v0.11.7, Trim Galore! v0.4.2 and cutadapt v1.9.1. The trimmed reads were aligned to the reference human genome version GRCh38/hg38 with the program HISAT2 v2.0.5. Aligned reads were stripped of duplicate reads with the program sambamba v0.6.8. Peaks were called using the program MACS v2.1.2 using the broad peaks mode. To obtain the consensus set of unique peaks, called peaks from all samples are merged at 50% overlap using BEDtools v2.27.0. The consensus peaks, originally in BED format were converted to a Gene Transfer Format (GTF) to enable fast counting of reads under the peaks with the program featureCounts v1.6.2. Each feature in the GTF file has the value “peak” on the second column. Peaks located on chromosomes X, Y and mitochondrial DNA are excluded from further analysis. Raw read counts are normalized with respect to library size and transformed to log2 scale using rlog() function in R package DESeq2 v1.26.0.

Random forest regression model

Log-transformed data were filtered to remove low variance peaks using the VarianceThreshold function from scikit-learn v0.24.1 using a threshold of 0.45. The resulting 8439 features were used to build a random forest regression model using RandomForestRegressor from the ensemble module of scikit-learn. The options used was n_estimators: 1000, max_samples = 0.9, oob_score = True. Permutation importance was used to rank the peaks. The out-of-bag R2 value for the regression was 0.31.

Elastic-net regularized generalized linear models

We selected the top 20 peaks with highest mean feature importance value from 8439 peaks. To assess the survival predictive power of clinical metadata and top 20 ATAC-seq peaks, we trained elastic-net regularized generalized linear models using ‘glmnet’ package in R. We tested the performance of three different models that are built using following features (1) top 20 ATAC-seq peaks (2) clinical metadata only; (3) clinical metadata + top 20 ATAC-seq peaks. Leave one out cross validation imputation was applied and alpha parameter was explored between 0 and 1 with incrementing step size of 0.1. Out of 36 samples, IDH mutation information of 4 samples was not available. These 4 samples were excluded from models which include clinical metadata as features. Prediction accuracy of models was assessed by computing R2 value.

Processing of RNA-seq data

The quality control check on RNA-seq reads was performed with FastQC v0.11.7. Adapter sequences and bad quality segments were trimmed using Trim Galore! v0.4.2 and cutadapt v1.9.1. The trimmed reads were aligned to the reference human genome version GRCh38/hg38 with the program STAR v2.6.1e. Duplicate aligned reads were removed using the program sambamba v0.6.8. Gene-level expression was assessed by counting features for each gene, as defined in the NCBI’s RefSeq database. Read counting was done with the program featureCounts v1.6.2 from the Rsubread package. Raw counts were normalized with respect to library size and transformed to log2 scale using rlog() function in R package DESeq2 v1.26.0.

ATAC-seq and RNA-seq correlation analysis

Sixteen samples have atac-seq chromatin accessibility as well as RNA-seq gene expression data which is used for correlation analysis. To compare the chromatin accessibility and gene expression, we identified the peak-gene pairs which are located within same topologically associating domain (TAD). Peaks having at least 90% overlap with TAD are selected for further analysis. Out of 8439 peaks, 8419 peaks show ≥ 90% overlap with TAD region and 8416 peaks have at least 1 gene within the overlapping TAD. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for each peak-gene pair.

Analysis of differential chromatin accessibility

The significant changes of chromatin accessibility in each subgroup (Grade II, Grade III, Grade IV Primary and Grade IV Recurrent) were assessed with the R package DESeq2 v1.26.0. The 8439 most important peaks from the random forest regression model are selected for the differential analysis. Samples from a specific subgroup (e.g. Grade II) are compared against remaining samples from the dataset. Differential peaks with log2FoldChange ≥ 0.3 and FDR ≤ 0.05 are selected for motif enrichment analysis using HOMER v4.10. Remaining peaks from initial set of 8439 peaks are used as background data set in HOMER analysis. Only known human motifs from CIS-BP 2.0 are considered.

Radiation treatment

Three previously characterized patient-derived cultures (HK296[24], HK357[24], TS603[25]) underwent a radiation dose of 9 Gy in three fractions in a XenX (X-Strahl, Suwanee, GA) pre-clinical cabinet irradiator, with output calibrated using NIST-traceable instruments. The instrument parameters were: 220 kVp, 0.67 mm Cu HVL, dose rate ~ 6 cGy/s, delivered using a 100 mm × 100 mm collimator with 2 cm backscatter below the cell plates.

Sequencing database

The human database is publicly available from “basespace” login.illumina.com. All experimental protocols were approved by the University of Cincinnati IRB committee. This study was used de-identified patient specimens and was designated “Not human research” 19-02-25-02 (5/3/2019). Consent is not applicable.

Human database

The creation of the human database followed all methods in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. This study was used de-identified patient specimens and was designated “Not human research” 19-02-25-02 (5/3/2019). Consent is not applicable.

Consent to participate

This study does not involve human subjects.

Results

Atac-seq/RNA-seq correlation matrix creates chromatin maps with candidate target genes

This study includes thirty-eight glioma specimens spanning all grades (Grade II-7 specimens, Grade III-9 specimens, Grade IV primary-9 specimens, Grade IV recurrent-13 specimens). Seventeen specimens were determined to have an IDH1 mutation, 17 specimens were determined to be IDH1 wildtype. In four specimens, the IDH1 mutant status could not be determined. The collection includes three paired specimens in which a single patient underwent two surgeries (MG 18/MG19, MG20/MG21, MG27/28). Sixteen samples were of sufficient quality to allow RNA-sequencing analysis. The demographic and clinical information is shown in Table 1. Restricting analysis to those peaks with a univariate correlation of |r2| ≥ 0.6 revealed that the majority of peaks were positively correlated with survival (Fig. 1A) and positively correlated with gene expression (Fig. 1B). Gene ontology enrichment analysis of the identified correlated genes (peak-survival correlation |r2| ≥ 0.6 and peak-gene correlation |r2| ≥ 0.6) identified “Nervous System Development” as the most enriched gene module (Fig. 1C). Clustering using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) identified two clusters that segregated by IDH1 mutant status (Fig. 1D,E). While it is widely presumed that the IDH1 mutation induces DNA methylation and a closed conformation[18-20], there was a non-significant trend (p = 0.1) towards IDH1 mutant samples having more peaks (Fig. 1F).
Table 1

Demographic and clinical information for 38 glioma specimens spanning all grades (Grade II-7 specimens, Grade III-9 specimens, Grade IV prary-9 specimens, Grade IV recurrent-13 specimens).

Sample numberAgeGenderPathologyGradePrimary/recurrentIDH1Survival (months)RNA-seq
MG163FemaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentWT5Yes
MG277MaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentWT9Yes
MG367FemaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryWT51Yes
MG430FemaleAnaplastic astrocytomaIIIPrimaryWT44Yes
MG569MaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryWT3.5Yes
MG649MaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentWT5.5Yes
MG763MaleOligodendrogliomaIIPrimaryMut69Yes
MG876MaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryWT14No
MG925MaleAnaplastic oligodendrogliomaIIIPrimaryMut66Yes
MG1038FemaleOligodendrogliomaIIPrimaryMut65Yes
MG1146MaleAnaplastic oligodendrogliomaIIIPrimaryMut64Yes
MG1254FemaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentWT8Yes
MG1330FemaleAnaplastic oligodendrogliomaIIIPrimaryMut50Yes
MG1463FemaleAnaplastic oligodendrogliomaIIIPrimaryMut25Yes
MG1549FemaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryWT4Yes
MG1648MaleOligodendrogliomaIIPrimaryMut21Yes
MG1733FemaleOligodendrogliomaIIPrimaryMut14Yes
MG1840FemaleAnaplastic astrocytomaIIIPrimary34No
MG1943FemaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrent4No
MG2044FemaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryMut53No
MG2148FemaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentMut7No
MG2264MaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryWT5No
MG2332FemaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrent41No
MG2455MaleAnaplastic oligodendrogliomaIIIPrimaryMut97No
MG2547MaleAstrocytomaIIPrimaryMut88No
MG2631MaleAnaplastic astrocytomaIIIPrimaryMut89No
MG2758FemaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryWT16No
MG2858FemaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentWT13No
MG2963MaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrent4No
MG3049MaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentWT14No
MG3155MaleOligodendrogliomaIIPrimaryMut58No
MG3232MaleAstrocytomaIIPrimaryMut57No
MG3349FemaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryWT16No
MG3421FemaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentWT5No
MG3550MaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentMut5No
MG3669FemaleGlioblastomaIVPrimaryWT12No
MG3737FemaleGlioblastomaIVRecurrentMut39No
MG3866MaleAnaplastic oligodendrogliomaIIIPrimaryWT18No

Seventeen specimens were determined to have an IDH1 mutation, 17 specimens were determined to be IDH1 wildtype. In four specimens, the IDH1 mutant status could not be determined. The collection includes three paired specimens in which a single patient underwent two surgeries (MG 18/MG19, MG20/MG21, MG27/28). Sixteen samples were of sufficient quality to allow RNA-sequencing analysis.

Figure 1

(A) Univariate correlations between peaks and survival are plotted above for |r2| > 0.5, |r2| > 0.6, and |r2| > 0.7. The vast majority of the correlations between peaks and survival are positively correlated. (B) Univariate correlations between peaks and genes are plotted above for |r2| > 0.5, |r2| > 0.6, and |r2| > 0.7. The vast majority of the correlations between peaks and genes are positively correlated. (C) Peak-gene correlations of |r2| > 0.6 were subjected to gene ontology analysis. Significantly enriched gene modules are shown above. (D,E) UMAP clustering of all 38 samples coded by grade (D) and IDH1 status (E). (F) Total peaks (Transcript per million).

Demographic and clinical information for 38 glioma specimens spanning all grades (Grade II-7 specimens, Grade III-9 specimens, Grade IV prary-9 specimens, Grade IV recurrent-13 specimens). Seventeen specimens were determined to have an IDH1 mutation, 17 specimens were determined to be IDH1 wildtype. In four specimens, the IDH1 mutant status could not be determined. The collection includes three paired specimens in which a single patient underwent two surgeries (MG 18/MG19, MG20/MG21, MG27/28). Sixteen samples were of sufficient quality to allow RNA-sequencing analysis. (A) Univariate correlations between peaks and survival are plotted above for |r2| > 0.5, |r2| > 0.6, and |r2| > 0.7. The vast majority of the correlations between peaks and survival are positively correlated. (B) Univariate correlations between peaks and genes are plotted above for |r2| > 0.5, |r2| > 0.6, and |r2| > 0.7. The vast majority of the correlations between peaks and genes are positively correlated. (C) Peak-gene correlations of |r2| > 0.6 were subjected to gene ontology analysis. Significantly enriched gene modules are shown above. (D,E) UMAP clustering of all 38 samples coded by grade (D) and IDH1 status (E). (F) Total peaks (Transcript per million).

Prognostic model predicts identifies atac-seq peaks associated with grade/survival

Restricting the focus to only those genes with the most prognostic value, a random forest model identified 8439 peaks that were predictive of survival. The majority of these peaks mapped to intergenic regions. Using the atac-seq/RNA-seq correlation matrix, 29,679 genes were correlated with the identified 8439 peaks (gene-peak correlation |r2| ≥ 0.6). Contrary to the hypothesis that peaks target the “nearest gene”, only 1863 (2.5%) of these correlations were between a peak and its “nearest gene”. Linear regression models identified six peaks that predicted survival with a high degree of accuracy (R2 = 0.6845). The six most closely correlated target gene regions are shown in Fig. 2A. Four of the annotated genes have reported roles in cancer. GUCY1B3[26,27] and IMPAD1[28,29] are reported oncogenes while GRIA2[30] and LZTS1[31] are reported tumor suppressors. This peak linear regression model was compared against a model using established predictive clinical variables (age, gender, grade, pathology and IDH1 status) which yielded a higher degree of accuracy (R2 = 0.7271 Fig. 2B). Combining the atac-seq peaks and clinical variables created the most accurate model (R2 = 0.8164 Fig. 2C) indicating that four of the atac-seq peaks have predictive value independent of traditionally used clinical variables.
Figure 2

(A) The six most predictive atac-seq peaks were used to create a linear regression model to predict survival. The constants associated with this linear equation are shown in column two and the most correlated gene in column 3. (B) Six typically used clinical and demographic variables were used to create a linear regression model to predict survival. (C) Combining atac-seq peaks and clinical variables into a linear regression model yielded the most accurate prediction model.

(A) The six most predictive atac-seq peaks were used to create a linear regression model to predict survival. The constants associated with this linear equation are shown in column two and the most correlated gene in column 3. (B) Six typically used clinical and demographic variables were used to create a linear regression model to predict survival. (C) Combining atac-seq peaks and clinical variables into a linear regression model yielded the most accurate prediction model.

Recurrent grade IV gliomas are associated with fewer open chromatin sites

Each grade was compared to all others to identity any differentially represented atac-seq peaks (Fig. 3). These grade-specific peaks then underwent HOMER motif analysis to determine which likely transcription factors drove gene expression in each grade. Finally, peak-associated genes were identified and underwent gene ontology analysis to determine candidate target gene pathways for each grade. Grade II (2326 peaks, 3204 genes), grade III (1708 peaks, 2508 genes), and grade IV (primary) (3058 peaks, 3819 genes) samples had similar and heavily overlapping sets of transcription factor motifs and enriched gene modules (Fig. 3). In contrast, grade IV recurrent (14 peaks, 37 genes) had relatively few peaks and no significantly enriched gene modules.
Figure 3

Each of the 8349 peaks was assigned to one of the four grades (Grade II, Grade III, Grade IV primary, Grade IV recurrent) based on representation in that group. These peaks underwent HOMER analysis to determine enriched transcription factor motifs and gene ontology based on the associated genes. Grade IV recurrent samples had very few peaks and no significantly enriched gene modules.

Each of the 8349 peaks was assigned to one of the four grades (Grade II, Grade III, Grade IV primary, Grade IV recurrent) based on representation in that group. These peaks underwent HOMER analysis to determine enriched transcription factor motifs and gene ontology based on the associated genes. Grade IV recurrent samples had very few peaks and no significantly enriched gene modules. To determine if this finding was specific to the identified 8439 peaks or part of a larger trend, the total peak count was calculated for each of the grades. Similar to the previous finding, grade IV (recurrent) samples had significantly fewer total peaks than grade II samples (p = 0.02) (Fig. 4A,B). This collection contains three “paired” samples each of which were grade IV that underwent resection followed by standard adjuvant treatment (temozolomide and radiation) and later a second resection. In each case, the later sample (“recurrent” sample) had fewer peaks (Fig. 4C). This invites two possibilities. The first possibility is the decrease in peak count is a selection process where only cells with fewer peaks grow back. The second possibility is that the decrease in peak count is a consequence of the clinical treatment (e.g. surgery, temozolomide and radiation). In support of the latter induction hypothesis, MG 30/31 was a patient who had two distinct tumors that were present on initial diagnosis. The first (MG 30) was resected and the second tumor (MG31) underwent chemotherapy and radiation followed by resection. To provide further evidence for the latter hypothesis, three previously characterized patient-derived glioma cultures (HK296[24], HK357[24], TS603[25]) underwent atac-seq analysis before and after 9 Gray of radiation in three daily fractions. All three cell lines showed a decrease in peak count following radiation (Fig. 4D).
Figure 4

(A) The total peaks (transcripts per million > 10) were calculated for each sample and tabulated by grade. Grade II samples had significantly more peaks than Grade IV recurrent samples (ANOVA). (B) The total peak counts for three paired samples are shown. (C) Samples were divided by IDH1 status and by primary vs. recurrent status. (D) Three patient derived glioblastoma cell lines were subjected to atac-seq analysis before and after 9 grey radiation in three fractions.

(A) The total peaks (transcripts per million > 10) were calculated for each sample and tabulated by grade. Grade II samples had significantly more peaks than Grade IV recurrent samples (ANOVA). (B) The total peak counts for three paired samples are shown. (C) Samples were divided by IDH1 status and by primary vs. recurrent status. (D) Three patient derived glioblastoma cell lines were subjected to atac-seq analysis before and after 9 grey radiation in three fractions.

Discussion

Glioblastoma is a currently incurable disease and despite decades of research and hundreds of clinical trials, the prognosis remains grim. One frustration encountered by several trials[6] including those investigating the roles of radiation[4] is that improvements in progression-free survival do not always translate into improvements in overall survival. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is that while certain therapies may initially impede tumor growth those cells that survive may take on additional attributes that make them more destructive and refractory to treatment. The data from this study provides an intriguing new model for this transition. The majority of atac-seq peaks identified in this study were correlated with better survival and tended to positively correlate with genes of nervous system differentiation. There was a non-significant trend for total peak count to decrease as the grade increased with the most significant decrease seen in the recurrent grade IV samples. It may be the case, that the closing of DNA regions responsible for driving neural differentiation induces more malignant behavior and that this process can be accelerated by radiation. If this were true, it may be beneficial to pair radiation therapy with other compounds that could potentially minimize this unwanted side effect. With advancements in the availability and cost of sequencing, traditional histological classifications have been replaced with more sophisticated genetic markers. Despite the wealth of glioma expression data, attempts to identify patterns of gene expression that predict survival have been underwhelming[32,33]. In contrast, epigenetic data such as DNA methylation (e.g. G-CIMP) seems to have a high degree of prognostic value[18,32,34]. Supporting this observation, this study created an accurate prognostic survival model with only six atac-seq peaks, four of which remained significant when controlling for grade, age and IDH1 status. The discovery of the IDH1[35] and H3K27M[36,37] mutations has revealed the importance of epigenetic dysfunction in the early stages of cancer development. The presumed mechanism of the IDH1 mutation is to favor DNA methylation by inhibiting DNA demethylase enzymes (e.g. Tet family)[18,19]. This is hypothesized to induce decreased DNA accessibility with subsequent gene down-regulation[20]. In the current study, UMAP clustering divided samples by IDH1 status although several IDH1 mutant samples clustered with the IDH1 wildtype group. Running counter to the hypothesis that the IDH1 mutation leads to hyper-methylation and decreased DNA accessibility, there was a trend for IDH1 mutant samples to have more total peaks. This implies that the relationship between DNA methylation and DNA accessibility may be more complicated than previously assumed. The relative ease and low input requirement of atac-seq technology has led to wide-spread use on a variety of tissue types[38-40]. However, while the data is easy to obtain it is challenging to interpret without additional sources of supporting evidence. In the absence of this supporting evidence several assumptions have become common in the literature namely that a given peak positively regulates the nearest gene. In the current study, the authors assembled a sufficiently large dataset to create a correlation matrix to make some rational assumptions about the relationships of peaks and target genes. Using relatively strict cut-offs, the data showed that most peaks were correlated with one or at most a few genes. The majority of peaks correlated positively with target gene expression. However, there was no correlation between peaks and the nearest genes. On the contrary, peaks and correlated genes were frequently separated by long distances and including many intervening genes. It should be noted that while this study provides some evidence of specific intergenic regions regulating specific target genes, the data is correlational and indirect and needs to be strengthened by alternative methods such as genetic manipulation (CRISPR) or chromosome conformation capture-based methods. In conclusion, this study uses an innovative peak:gene correlation matrix to create an epigenetic gene regulatory map of gliomas and then uses this matrix to both identify specific gene regulatory regions of interest as well as introduce a possible mechanism of epigenetic malignant progression.
  40 in total

1.  Comprehensive, Integrative Genomic Analysis of Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  Daniel J Brat; Roel G W Verhaak; Kenneth D Aldape; W K Alfred Yung; Sofie R Salama; Lee A D Cooper; Esther Rheinbay; C Ryan Miller; Mark Vitucci; Olena Morozova; A Gordon Robertson; Houtan Noushmehr; Peter W Laird; Andrew D Cherniack; Rehan Akbani; Jason T Huse; Giovanni Ciriello; Laila M Poisson; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Mitchel S Berger; Cameron Brennan; Rivka R Colen; Howard Colman; Adam E Flanders; Caterina Giannini; Mia Grifford; Antonio Iavarone; Rajan Jain; Isaac Joseph; Jaegil Kim; Katayoon Kasaian; Tom Mikkelsen; Bradley A Murray; Brian Patrick O'Neill; Lior Pachter; Donald W Parsons; Carrie Sougnez; Erik P Sulman; Scott R Vandenberg; Erwin G Van Meir; Andreas von Deimling; Hailei Zhang; Daniel Crain; Kevin Lau; David Mallery; Scott Morris; Joseph Paulauskis; Robert Penny; Troy Shelton; Mark Sherman; Peggy Yena; Aaron Black; Jay Bowen; Katie Dicostanzo; Julie Gastier-Foster; Kristen M Leraas; Tara M Lichtenberg; Christopher R Pierson; Nilsa C Ramirez; Cynthia Taylor; Stephanie Weaver; Lisa Wise; Erik Zmuda; Tanja Davidsen; John A Demchok; Greg Eley; Martin L Ferguson; Carolyn M Hutter; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Bradley A Ozenberger; Margi Sheth; Heidi J Sofia; Roy Tarnuzzer; Zhining Wang; Liming Yang; Jean Claude Zenklusen; Brenda Ayala; Julien Baboud; Sudha Chudamani; Mark A Jensen; Jia Liu; Todd Pihl; Rohini Raman; Yunhu Wan; Ye Wu; Adrian Ally; J Todd Auman; Miruna Balasundaram; Saianand Balu; Stephen B Baylin; Rameen Beroukhim; Moiz S Bootwalla; Reanne Bowlby; Christopher A Bristow; Denise Brooks; Yaron Butterfield; Rebecca Carlsen; Scott Carter; Lynda Chin; Andy Chu; Eric Chuah; Kristian Cibulskis; Amanda Clarke; Simon G Coetzee; Noreen Dhalla; Tim Fennell; Sheila Fisher; Stacey Gabriel; Gad Getz; Richard Gibbs; Ranabir Guin; Angela Hadjipanayis; D Neil Hayes; Toshinori Hinoue; Katherine Hoadley; Robert A Holt; Alan P Hoyle; Stuart R Jefferys; Steven Jones; Corbin D Jones; Raju Kucherlapati; Phillip H Lai; Eric Lander; Semin Lee; Lee Lichtenstein; Yussanne Ma; Dennis T Maglinte; Harshad S Mahadeshwar; Marco A Marra; Michael Mayo; Shaowu Meng; Matthew L Meyerson; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Richard A Moore; Lisle E Mose; Andrew J Mungall; Angeliki Pantazi; Michael Parfenov; Peter J Park; Joel S Parker; Charles M Perou; Alexei Protopopov; Xiaojia Ren; Jeffrey Roach; Thaís S Sabedot; Jacqueline Schein; Steven E Schumacher; Jonathan G Seidman; Sahil Seth; Hui Shen; Janae V Simons; Payal Sipahimalani; Matthew G Soloway; Xingzhi Song; Huandong Sun; Barbara Tabak; Angela Tam; Donghui Tan; Jiabin Tang; Nina Thiessen; Timothy Triche; David J Van Den Berg; Umadevi Veluvolu; Scot Waring; Daniel J Weisenberger; Matthew D Wilkerson; Tina Wong; Junyuan Wu; Liu Xi; Andrew W Xu; Lixing Yang; Travis I Zack; Jianhua Zhang; B Arman Aksoy; Harindra Arachchi; Chris Benz; Brady Bernard; Daniel Carlin; Juok Cho; Daniel DiCara; Scott Frazer; Gregory N Fuller; JianJiong Gao; Nils Gehlenborg; David Haussler; David I Heiman; Lisa Iype; Anders Jacobsen; Zhenlin Ju; Sol Katzman; Hoon Kim; Theo Knijnenburg; Richard Bailey Kreisberg; Michael S Lawrence; William Lee; Kalle Leinonen; Pei Lin; Shiyun Ling; Wenbin Liu; Yingchun Liu; Yuexin Liu; Yiling Lu; Gordon Mills; Sam Ng; Michael S Noble; Evan Paull; Arvind Rao; Sheila Reynolds; Gordon Saksena; Zack Sanborn; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz; Yasin Senbabaoglu; Ronglai Shen; Ilya Shmulevich; Rileen Sinha; Josh Stuart; S Onur Sumer; Yichao Sun; Natalie Tasman; Barry S Taylor; Doug Voet; Nils Weinhold; John N Weinstein; Da Yang; Kosuke Yoshihara; Siyuan Zheng; Wei Zhang; Lihua Zou; Ty Abel; Sara Sadeghi; Mark L Cohen; Jenny Eschbacher; Eyas M Hattab; Aditya Raghunathan; Matthew J Schniederjan; Dina Aziz; Gene Barnett; Wendi Barrett; Darell D Bigner; Lori Boice; Cathy Brewer; Chiara Calatozzolo; Benito Campos; Carlos Gilberto Carlotti; Timothy A Chan; Lucia Cuppini; Erin Curley; Stefania Cuzzubbo; Karen Devine; Francesco DiMeco; Rebecca Duell; J Bradley Elder; Ashley Fehrenbach; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; Jordonna Fulop; Johanna Gardner; Beth Hermes; Christel Herold-Mende; Christine Jungk; Ady Kendler; Norman L Lehman; Eric Lipp; Ouida Liu; Randy Mandt; Mary McGraw; Roger Mclendon; Christopher McPherson; Luciano Neder; Phuong Nguyen; Ardene Noss; Raffaele Nunziata; Quinn T Ostrom; Cheryl Palmer; Alessandro Perin; Bianca Pollo; Alexander Potapov; Olga Potapova; W Kimryn Rathmell; Daniil Rotin; Lisa Scarpace; Cathy Schilero; Kelly Senecal; Kristen Shimmel; Vsevolod Shurkhay; Suzanne Sifri; Rosy Singh; Andrew E Sloan; Kathy Smolenski; Susan M Staugaitis; Ruth Steele; Leigh Thorne; Daniela P C Tirapelli; Andreas Unterberg; Mahitha Vallurupalli; Yun Wang; Ronald Warnick; Felicia Williams; Yingli Wolinsky; Sue Bell; Mara Rosenberg; Chip Stewart; Franklin Huang; Jonna L Grimsby; Amie J Radenbaugh; Jianan Zhang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Current understanding of the role and targeting of tumor suppressor p53 in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Bryant England; Tiangui Huang; Michael Karsy
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-06-05

3.  An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  IMPAD1 functions as mitochondrial electron transport inhibitor that prevents ROS production and promotes lung cancer metastasis through the AMPK-Notch1-HEY1 pathway.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Yang; Yen-Yun Wang; Michael Hsiao; Steven Lo; Yu-Chan Chang; Yi-Hua Jan; Tsung-Ching Lai; Yi-Chen Lee; Ya-Ching Hsieh; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Comprehensive Genomic Analysis in NRG Oncology/RTOG 9802: A Phase III Trial of Radiation Versus Radiation Plus Procarbazine, Lomustine (CCNU), and Vincristine in High-Risk Low-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Erica H Bell; Peixin Zhang; Edward G Shaw; Jan C Buckner; Geoffrey R Barger; Dennis E Bullard; Minesh P Mehta; Mark R Gilbert; Paul D Brown; Keith J Stelzer; Joseph P McElroy; Jessica L Fleming; Cynthia D Timmers; Aline P Becker; Andrea L Salavaggione; Ziyan Liu; Kenneth Aldape; David G Brachman; Stanley Z Gertler; Albert D Murtha; Christopher J Schultz; David Johnson; Nadia N Laack; Grant K Hunter; Ian R Crocker; Minhee Won; Arnab Chakravarti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 6.  Glioma through the looking GLASS: molecular evolution of diffuse gliomas and the Glioma Longitudinal Analysis Consortium.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Pieter Wesseling; Daniel J Brat; Ian A Cree; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Cynthia Hawkins; H K Ng; Stefan M Pfister; Guido Reifenberger; Riccardo Soffietti; Andreas von Deimling; David W Ellison
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.029

8.  Longitudinal molecular trajectories of diffuse glioma in adults.

Authors:  Floris P Barthel; Kevin C Johnson; Frederick S Varn; Anzhela D Moskalik; Georgette Tanner; Emre Kocakavuk; Kevin J Anderson; Olajide Abiola; Kenneth Aldape; Kristin D Alfaro; Donat Alpar; Samirkumar B Amin; David M Ashley; Pratiti Bandopadhayay; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Rameen Beroukhim; Christoph Bock; Priscilla K Brastianos; Daniel J Brat; Andrew R Brodbelt; Alexander F Bruns; Ketan R Bulsara; Aruna Chakrabarty; Arnab Chakravarti; Jeffrey H Chuang; Elizabeth B Claus; Elizabeth J Cochran; Jennifer Connelly; Joseph F Costello; Gaetano Finocchiaro; Michael N Fletcher; Pim J French; Hui K Gan; Mark R Gilbert; Peter V Gould; Matthew R Grimmer; Antonio Iavarone; Azzam Ismail; Michael D Jenkinson; Mustafa Khasraw; Hoon Kim; Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven; Peter S LaViolette; Meihong Li; Peter Lichter; Keith L Ligon; Allison K Lowman; Tathiane M Malta; Tali Mazor; Kerrie L McDonald; Annette M Molinaro; Do-Hyun Nam; Naema Nayyar; Ho Keung Ng; Chew Yee Ngan; Simone P Niclou; Johanna M Niers; Houtan Noushmehr; Javad Noorbakhsh; D Ryan Ormond; Chul-Kee Park; Laila M Poisson; Raul Rabadan; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Ganesh Rao; Guido Reifenberger; Jason K Sa; Michael Schuster; Brian L Shaw; Susan C Short; Peter A Sillevis Smitt; Andrew E Sloan; Marion Smits; Hiromichi Suzuki; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Erwin G Van Meir; Colin Watts; Michael Weller; Pieter Wesseling; Bart A Westerman; Georg Widhalm; Adelheid Woehrer; W K Alfred Yung; Gelareh Zadeh; Jason T Huse; John F De Groot; Lucy F Stead; Roel G W Verhaak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 69.504

9.  IMPAD1 and KDELR2 drive invasion and metastasis by enhancing Golgi-mediated secretion.

Authors:  Rakhee Bajaj; Samrat T Kundu; Caitlin L Grzeskowiak; Jared J Fradette; Kenneth L Scott; Chad J Creighton; Don L Gibbons
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma (EORTC 22033-26033): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study.

Authors:  Brigitta G Baumert; Monika E Hegi; Martin J van den Bent; Andreas von Deimling; Thierry Gorlia; Khê Hoang-Xuan; Alba A Brandes; Guy Kantor; Martin J B Taphoorn; Mohamed Ben Hassel; Christian Hartmann; Gail Ryan; David Capper; Johan M Kros; Sebastian Kurscheid; Wolfgang Wick; Roelien Enting; Michele Reni; Brian Thiessen; Frederic Dhermain; Jacoline E Bromberg; Loic Feuvret; Jaap C Reijneveld; Olivier Chinot; Johanna M M Gijtenbeek; John P Rossiter; Nicolas Dif; Carmen Balana; Jose Bravo-Marques; Paul M Clement; Christine Marosi; Tzahala Tzuk-Shina; Robert A Nordal; Jeremy Rees; Denis Lacombe; Warren P Mason; Roger Stupp
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 54.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.