| Literature DB >> 26824661 |
Michele Ceccarelli1, Floris P Barthel2, Tathiane M Malta3, Thais S Sabedot3, Sofie R Salama4, Bradley A Murray5, Olena Morozova4, Yulia Newton4, Amie Radenbaugh4, Stefano M Pagnotta6, Samreen Anjum7, Jiguang Wang8, Ganiraju Manyam9, Pietro Zoppoli8, Shiyun Ling9, Arjun A Rao4, Mia Grifford4, Andrew D Cherniack5, Hailei Zhang5, Laila Poisson10, Carlos Gilberto Carlotti3, Daniela Pretti da Cunha Tirapelli3, Arvind Rao9, Tom Mikkelsen10, Ching C Lau11, W K Alfred Yung9, Raul Rabadan8, Jason Huse12, Daniel J Brat13, Norman L Lehman14, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan15, Siyuan Zheng9, Kenneth Hess9, Ganesh Rao9, Matthew Meyerson16, Rameen Beroukhim17, Lee Cooper13, Rehan Akbani9, Margaret Wrensch18, David Haussler4, Kenneth D Aldape19, Peter W Laird20, David H Gutmann21, Houtan Noushmehr22, Antonio Iavarone23, Roel G W Verhaak24.
Abstract
Therapy development for adult diffuse glioma is hindered by incomplete knowledge of somatic glioma driving alterations and suboptimal disease classification. We defined the complete set of genes associated with 1,122 diffuse grade II-III-IV gliomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas and used molecular profiles to improve disease classification, identify molecular correlations, and provide insights into the progression from low- to high-grade disease. Whole-genome sequencing data analysis determined that ATRX but not TERT promoter mutations are associated with increased telomere length. Recent advances in glioma classification based on IDH mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion status were recapitulated through analysis of DNA methylation profiles, which identified clinically relevant molecular subsets. A subtype of IDH mutant glioma was associated with DNA demethylation and poor outcome; a group of IDH-wild-type diffuse glioma showed molecular similarity to pilocytic astrocytoma and relatively favorable survival. Understanding of cohesive disease groups may aid improved clinical outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26824661 PMCID: PMC4754110 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell ISSN: 0092-8674 Impact factor: 41.582