Literature DB >> 35578132

Meta-matching as a simple framework to translate phenotypic predictive models from big to small data.

Tong He1,2,3, Lijun An1,2,3, Pansheng Chen1,2,3, Jianzhong Chen1,2,3, Jiashi Feng4, Danilo Bzdok5,6, Avram J Holmes7, Simon B Eickhoff8,9, B T Thomas Yeo10,11,12,13,14.   

Abstract

We propose a simple framework-meta-matching-to translate predictive models from large-scale datasets to new unseen non-brain-imaging phenotypes in small-scale studies. The key consideration is that a unique phenotype from a boutique study likely correlates with (but is not the same as) related phenotypes in some large-scale dataset. Meta-matching exploits these correlations to boost prediction in the boutique study. We apply meta-matching to predict non-brain-imaging phenotypes from resting-state functional connectivity. Using the UK Biobank (N = 36,848) and Human Connectome Project (HCP) (N = 1,019) datasets, we demonstrate that meta-matching can greatly boost the prediction of new phenotypes in small independent datasets in many scenarios. For example, translating a UK Biobank model to 100 HCP participants yields an eight-fold improvement in variance explained with an average absolute gain of 4.0% (minimum = -0.2%, maximum = 16.0%) across 35 phenotypes. With a growing number of large-scale datasets collecting increasingly diverse phenotypes, our results represent a lower bound on the potential of meta-matching.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35578132      PMCID: PMC9202200          DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01059-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   28.771


  44 in total

1.  Does feature selection improve classification accuracy? Impact of sample size and feature selection on classification using anatomical magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Carlton Chu; Ai-Ling Hsu; Kun-Hsien Chou; Peter Bandettini; Chingpo Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics.

Authors:  Tong He; Ru Kong; Avram J Holmes; Minh Nguyen; Mert R Sabuncu; Simon B Eickhoff; Danilo Bzdok; Jiashi Feng; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Predictive models avoid excessive reductionism in cognitive neuroimaging.

Authors:  Gaël Varoquaux; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  The effect of machine learning regression algorithms and sample size on individualized behavioral prediction with functional connectivity features.

Authors:  Zaixu Cui; Gaolang Gong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  John D E Gabrieli; Satrajit S Ghosh; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Establishment of Best Practices for Evidence for Prediction: A Review.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack; Grace Huckins; Gael Varoquaux
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 7.  Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging.

Authors:  Choong-Wan Woo; Luke J Chang; Martin A Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Machine Learning for Precision Psychiatry: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Danilo Bzdok; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-12-06

9.  Identification of autism spectrum disorder using deep learning and the ABIDE dataset.

Authors:  Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld; Alexandre Rosa Franco; R Cameron Craddock; Augusto Buchweitz; Felipe Meneguzzi
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 10.  Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mohammad R Arbabshirani; Sergey Plis; Jing Sui; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  Piggybacking on big data.

Authors:  Janine Bijsterbosch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 28.771

2.  Proportional intracranial volume correction differentially biases behavioral predictions across neuroanatomical features, sexes, and development.

Authors:  Elvisha Dhamala; Leon Qi Rong Ooi; Jianzhong Chen; Ru Kong; Kevin M Anderson; Rowena Chin; B T Thomas Yeo; Avram J Holmes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 7.400

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.