Literature DB >> 29870817

The effect of machine learning regression algorithms and sample size on individualized behavioral prediction with functional connectivity features.

Zaixu Cui1, Gaolang Gong2.   

Abstract

Individualized behavioral/cognitive prediction using machine learning (ML) regression approaches is becoming increasingly applied. The specific ML regression algorithm and sample size are two key factors that non-trivially influence prediction accuracies. However, the effects of the ML regression algorithm and sample size on individualized behavioral/cognitive prediction performance have not been comprehensively assessed. To address this issue, the present study included six commonly used ML regression algorithms: ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, ridge regression, elastic-net regression, linear support vector regression (LSVR), and relevance vector regression (RVR), to perform specific behavioral/cognitive predictions based on different sample sizes. Specifically, the publicly available resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) dataset from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) was used, and whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) or rsFC strength (rsFCS) were extracted as prediction features. Twenty-five sample sizes (ranged from 20 to 700) were studied by sub-sampling from the entire HCP cohort. The analyses showed that rsFC-based LASSO regression performed remarkably worse than the other algorithms, and rsFCS-based OLS regression performed markedly worse than the other algorithms. Regardless of the algorithm and feature type, both the prediction accuracy and its stability exponentially increased with increasing sample size. The specific patterns of the observed algorithm and sample size effects were well replicated in the prediction using re-testing fMRI data, data processed by different imaging preprocessing schemes, and different behavioral/cognitive scores, thus indicating excellent robustness/generalization of the effects. The current findings provide critical insight into how the selected ML regression algorithm and sample size influence individualized predictions of behavior/cognition and offer important guidance for choosing the ML regression algorithm or sample size in relevant investigations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Individualized prediction; Machine learning; Regression algorithm; Resting-state functional connectivity; Sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29870817     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  56 in total

1.  Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth.

Authors:  Zaixu Cui; Hongming Li; Cedric H Xia; Bart Larsen; Azeez Adebimpe; Graham L Baum; Matt Cieslak; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Desmond J Oathes; Aaron F Alexander-Bloch; Armin Raznahan; David R Roalf; Russell T Shinohara; Daniel H Wolf; Christos Davatzikos; Danielle S Bassett; Damien A Fair; Yong Fan; Theodore D Satterthwaite
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Treatment-naïve first episode depression classification based on high-order brain functional network.

Authors:  Yanting Zheng; Xiaobo Chen; Danian Li; Yujie Liu; Xin Tan; Yi Liang; Han Zhang; Shijun Qiu; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Reply: The influence of sample size and arbitrary statistical thresholds in lesion-network mapping.

Authors:  Alexander L Cohen; Michael D Fox
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Connectome-based model predicts individual differences in propensity to trust.

Authors:  Xiaping Lu; Ting Li; Zhichao Xia; Ruida Zhu; Li Wang; Yue-Jia Luo; Chunliang Feng; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Combining multiple connectomes improves predictive modeling of phenotypic measures.

Authors:  Siyuan Gao; Abigail S Greene; R Todd Constable; Dustin Scheinost
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Multivariate machine learning-based language mapping in glioma patients based on lesion topography.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Binke Yuan; Jing Yan; Jingliang Cheng; Junfeng Lu; Jinsong Wu
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  Optimization of energy state transition trajectory supports the development of executive function during youth.

Authors:  Danielle S Bassett; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Zaixu Cui; Jennifer Stiso; Graham L Baum; Jason Z Kim; David R Roalf; Richard F Betzel; Shi Gu; Zhixin Lu; Cedric H Xia; Xiaosong He; Rastko Ciric; Desmond J Oathes; Tyler M Moore; Russell T Shinohara; Kosha Ruparel; Christos Davatzikos; Fabio Pasqualetti; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Machine Learning With Neuroimaging: Evaluating Its Applications in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Ashley N Nielsen; Deanna M Barch; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Deanna J Greene
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-11-27

9.  Machine Learning Classification of Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Status with Morphologic Variables and Hemodynamic Parameters.

Authors:  Satoru Tanioka; Fujimaro Ishida; Atsushi Yamamoto; Shigetoshi Shimizu; Hiroshi Sakaida; Mitsuru Toyoda; Nobuhisa Kashiwagi; Hidenori Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-01-15

10.  Distributed functional connectivity predicts neuropsychological test performance among older adults.

Authors:  Seyul Kwak; Hairin Kim; Hoyoung Kim; Yoosik Youm; Jeanyung Chey
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.