Literature DB >> 29967979

Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas.

Marc Brysbaert1, Paweł Mandera2, Samantha F McCormick3, Emmanuel Keuleers4.   

Abstract

We present word prevalence data for 61,858 English words. Word prevalence refers to the number of people who know the word. The measure was obtained on the basis of an online crowdsourcing study involving over 220,000 people. Word prevalence data are useful for gauging the difficulty of words and, as such, for matching stimulus materials in experimental conditions or selecting stimulus materials for vocabulary tests. Word prevalence also predicts word processing times, over and above the effects of word frequency, word length, similarity to other words, and age of acquisition, in line with previous findings in the Dutch language.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Megastudy; Word frequency; Word prevalence; Word processing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29967979     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  28 in total

1.  Semantic similarity and associated abstractness norms for 630 French word pairs.

Authors:  Dounia Lakhzoum; Marie Izaute; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10-01

2.  Validated tests for language research with university students whose native language is English: Tests of vocabulary, general knowledge, author recognition, and reading comprehension.

Authors:  Hanke Vermeiren; Aaron Vandendaele; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Accounting for item-level variance in recognition memory: Comparing word frequency and contextual diversity.

Authors:  Brendan T Johns
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-11-22

4.  What makes domain knowledge difficult? Word usage frequency from SUBTLEX and dlexDB explains knowledge item difficulty.

Authors:  Ulrich Ludewig; Pascal Alscher; Xiaobin Chen; Nele McElvany
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  SCOPE: The South Carolina psycholinguistic metabase.

Authors:  Chuanji Gao; Svetlana V Shinkareva; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-15

6.  Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words.

Authors:  Patrick Bonin; Betty Laroche; Alain Méot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-08

7.  Automated analysis of lexical features in frontotemporal degeneration.

Authors:  Sunghye Cho; Naomi Nevler; Sharon Ash; Sanjana Shellikeri; David J Irwin; Lauren Massimo; Katya Rascovsky; Christopher Olm; Murray Grossman; Mark Liberman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Lexical and Acoustic Characteristics of Young and Older Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sunghye Cho; Naomi Nevler; Sanjana Shellikeri; Natalia Parjane; David J Irwin; Neville Ryant; Sharon Ash; Christopher Cieri; Mark Liberman; Murray Grossman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Are people consistent when reading nonwords aloud on different occasions?

Authors:  Anastasia Ulicheva; Max Coltheart; Oxana Grosseck; Kathleen Rastle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-13

10.  The Auditory English Lexicon Project: A multi-talker, multi-region psycholinguistic database of 10,170 spoken words and nonwords.

Authors:  Winston D Goh; Melvin J Yap; Qian Wen Chee
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.