Literature DB >> 3557451

Population genetics implications of the premutation hypothesis for the generation of the fragile X mental retardation gene.

R M Winter.   

Abstract

The population genetics implications of the premutation hypothesis for the generation of the fragile X mental retardation gene are explored. With some broad assumptions, the consequences of the model are that 50% of mothers of probands carry the premutation; 6.5% of mothers of probands receive the premutation from their mothers, 18.9% from their fathers, and 24.6% as a "new mutation"; the incidence of carriers for the full mutation equals the incidence of affected males, whereas the incidence of carriers for the premutation is 1.35 times the incidence of affected males; assuming mutation rates are equal in eggs and sperm, the mutation rate from normal to premutation alleles is 1.67 X 10(-4); the expected segregation ratio in sibs of probands is 0.44, which corresponds to observed values. In addition, predictions using the premutation hypothesis of the expected segregation ratio in sibs of mothers of probands fits well with the data of Vogel and coworkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3557451     DOI: 10.1007/BF00281072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of linkage relationships between genetic markers around the fragile X locus with special reference to the daughters of normal transmitting males.

Authors:  R M Winter; M E Pembrey
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Recurrent mutation pressure does not explain the prevalence of the marker (X) syndrome.

Authors:  F Vogel; J Krüger; K B Nielsen; J P Fryns; D Schindler; A Schinzel; A Schmidt; E Schwinger
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  The female and the fragile X. A study of 144 obligate female carriers.

Authors:  J P Fryns
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb

4.  The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis.

Authors:  S L Sherman; N E Morton; P A Jacobs; G Turner
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Does unequal crossing over contribute to the mutation rate in Duchenne muscular dystrophy?

Authors:  R M Winter; M E Pembrey
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1982-08

6.  A premutation that generates a defect at crossing over explains the inheritance of fragile X mental retardation.

Authors:  M E Pembrey; R M Winter; K E Davies
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1985-08

7.  Further segregation analysis of the fragile X syndrome with special reference to transmitting males.

Authors:  S L Sherman; P A Jacobs; N E Morton; U Froster-Iskenius; P N Howard-Peebles; K B Nielsen; M W Partington; G R Sutherland; G Turner; M Watson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Estimating the stability of the proposed imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation when transmitted by females.

Authors:  P J Follette; C D Laird
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Population genetic consequences of the fragile-X syndrome, based on the X-inactivation imprinting model.

Authors:  J A Sved; C D Laird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Dissociation between mental retardation and fragile site expression in a family with fragile X-linked mental retardation.

Authors:  M A Voelckel; M G Mattei; C N'Guyen; N Philip; F Birg; J F Mattei
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  At what rate do new premutation alleles arise at the fragile X locus?

Authors:  Diane P Genereux; Charles D Laird
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Interpretation of the heterogeneity in the linkage relationships of DNA markers around the fragile X locus.

Authors:  R Winter; M Pembrey
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Prevalence and phenotype consequence of FRAXA and FRAXE alleles in a large, ethnically diverse, special education-needs population.

Authors:  D C Crawford; K L Meadows; J L Newman; L F Taft; D L Pettay; L B Gold; S J Hersey; E F Hinkle; M L Stanfield; P Holmgreen; M Yeargin-Allsopp; C Boyle; S L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Population dynamics of a meiotic/mitotic expansion model for the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A E Ashley; S L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.025

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.