Literature DB >> 2309697

Population genetic consequences of the fragile-X syndrome, based on the X-inactivation imprinting model.

J A Sved1, C D Laird.   

Abstract

We have examined the population genetic consequences of the model of Laird (Genetics 117:587-599, 1987) in which the fragile-X syndrome is caused by "imprinting" of a mutant chromosome. The imprinting event in this model results from a block to reactivation of an inactive X chromosome prior to oogenesis. If it is assumed that males carrying the imprinted chromosome never reproduce, the frequencies of females and males carrying the imprinted chromosome are expected to be equal. When a mutation-selection balance is established, there are expected to be somewhat more than twice as many females carrying the nonimprinted fragile X as carry the imprinted fragile-X chromosome, the excess depending on the fertility of fragile-X females. Nonpenetrant (transmitting) males, i.e., those with the nonimprinted fragile-X chromosome, are expected to be present at about the same frequency as are males with the syndrome. More than one-third of the nonimprinted chromosomes in the population are expected to be newly arisen in each generation. We have considered possible alternatives to the model of a mutation-selection balance. Nonimprinted carrier females would need to have 100% fertility excess to avoid postulating a high mutation rate to account for the very high prevalence of the syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2309697      PMCID: PMC1683633     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  9 in total

1.  Population genetics implications of the premutation hypothesis for the generation of the fragile X mental retardation gene.

Authors:  R M Winter
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Genetics and expression of the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  W T Brown; E C Jenkins; A C Gross; C B Chan; K Wisniewski; I L Cohen; C M Miezejeski
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci Suppl       Date:  1987

3.  The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis.

Authors:  S L Sherman; N E Morton; P A Jacobs; G Turner
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.670

4.  Mutation and selection in the marker (X) syndrome. A hypothesis.

Authors:  F Vogel
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Selection and mutation at an X-linked locus.

Authors:  T Nagylaki
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.670

6.  Fragile X families in a northern Swedish county--a genealogical study demonstrating apparent paternal transmission from the 18th century.

Authors:  G Holmgren; H K Blomquist; U Drugge; K H Gustavson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1988 May-Jun

7.  A premutation that generates a defect at crossing over explains the inheritance of fragile X mental retardation.

Authors:  M E Pembrey; R M Winter; K E Davies
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1985-08

8.  Further segregation analysis of the fragile X syndrome with special reference to transmitting males.

Authors:  S L Sherman; P A Jacobs; N E Morton; U Froster-Iskenius; P N Howard-Peebles; K B Nielsen; M W Partington; G R Sutherland; G Turner; M Watson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Proposed mechanism of inheritance and expression of the human fragile-X syndrome of mental retardation.

Authors:  C D Laird
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Estimating the stability of the proposed imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation when transmitted by females.

Authors:  P J Follette; C D Laird
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  X linked mental retardation.

Authors:  I A Glass
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Mutation-selection balance at a modifier-of-imprinting locus.

Authors:  H G Spencer; J A Barnett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Mutation-selection balance under genomic imprinting at an autosomal locus.

Authors:  H G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  At what rate do new premutation alleles arise at the fragile X locus?

Authors:  Diane P Genereux; Charles D Laird
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Between-generation differences in ascertainment and penetrance: relevance to genetic hypotheses in fragile X.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; L J Sheffield; D A Hay
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Prevalence and phenotype consequence of FRAXA and FRAXE alleles in a large, ethnically diverse, special education-needs population.

Authors:  D C Crawford; K L Meadows; J L Newman; L F Taft; D L Pettay; L B Gold; S J Hersey; E F Hinkle; M L Stanfield; P Holmgreen; M Yeargin-Allsopp; C Boyle; S L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Failure of imprinting at Igf-2: two models of mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  H G Spencer; M J Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Population dynamics of a meiotic/mitotic expansion model for the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A E Ashley; S L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Molecular cloning and analysis of the fragile X region in man.

Authors:  A Dietrich; P Kioschis; A P Monaco; B Gross; B Korn; S V Williams; D Sheer; D Heitz; I Oberle; D Toniolo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.