| Literature DB >> 35572802 |
Rana Roy1,2, Jinxin Wang1,3, Tanwne Sarker4, Abdul Kader5,6,7, Ahmed Khairul Hasan8, Emre Babur9,10.
Abstract
To improve our understanding of how coal mining areas can be re-vegetated and ecosystem function restored, we examined the potential effects of five water (W) regimes (40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% of field capacity), five nitrogen (N) (0, 24, 60, 96 and 120 mg kg‒1 soil) and five phosphorus (P) fertilizer doses (0, 36, 90, 144 and 180 mg kg‒1 soil), which control the growth and development of Elaeagnus angustifolia under adverse environmental conditions. To optimize the W-N-P application rate, three factors and five levels of central composite design along with an optimization technique named response surface methodology were utilized. Here we provide data on root-shoot biomass ratio, leaf dry matter content, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl) a, Chl b, membrane stability index and soluble protein content of E. angustifolia. The data described in this article are available in Mendeley Data, DOI: 10.17632/2vfbrdxyf2.2[1]. These data could be used to evaluate the improvement in growth performance of E. angustifolia subjected to various regimes of W, N and P. This dataset showed that E. angustifolia grew optimally in coal-mine spoils when irrigated at 66% of field capacity and supplemented with 74.0 mg N and 36.0 mg P kg‒1 soil. This could considerably help the success of revegetation in coal-mined degraded arid areas where W is scarce. This article contains data complementary to the main research entitled "Fine-tuning of soil water and nutrient fertilizer levels for the ecological restoration of coal-mined spoils using Elaeagnus angustifolia" in the Journal of Environmental Management (Roy et al., 2020).Entities:
Keywords: Coal spoils; Nutrient fertilization; Response surface methodology; Vegetation restoration; Water shortage
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572802 PMCID: PMC9097627 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Interaction effect of water (W), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) on root-shoot (R/S) biomass ratio, leaf dry matter content (LDMC), stomatal conductance (Gs), chlorophyll (Chl) a, Chl b, membrane stability index (MSI) and soluble protein (SP) content of E. angustifolia.
| Gs | Chl | Chl | SP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | R/S | LDMC g g‒1 | mol m‒2 s‒1 | mg g‒1 FW | mg g‒1 FW | MSI % | mg g‒1 FW |
| W70N96P144 | 0.74 ± 0.01cde | 0.229 ± 0.01b | 0.263 ± 0.02abcd | 1.95 ± 0.13ab | 0.99 ± 0.13a | 55.17 ± 0.957de | 56.78 ± 2.5ab |
| W70N96P36 | 0.76 ± 0.03bc | 0.235 ± 0.03b | 0.287 ± 0.02a | 2.07 ± 0.14a | 0.88 ± 0.04abcde | 54.45 ± 0.427def | 57.26 ± 1.1a |
| W70N24P144 | 0.68 ± 0.03f | 0.236 ± 0.02b | 0.284 ± 0.01ab | 1.99 ± 0.08ab | 0.92 ± 0.06abc | 51.22 ± 3.664g | 31.59 ± 3.5fgh |
| W70N24P36 | 0.7 ± 0.02def | 0.241 ± 0.03b | 0.239 ± 0.03abcde | 1.74 ± 0.15abcde | 0.84 ± 0.05abcdef | 53.22 ± 0.489efg | 25.07 ± 2hi |
| W50N96P144 | 0.8 ± 0.02ab | 0.252 ± 0.01b | 0.212 ± 0.02cde | 1.45 ± 0.13e | 0.66 ± 0.04fgh | 45.03 ± 0.361hi | 50.29 ± 5.4bc |
| W50N96P36 | 0.84 ± 0.02a | 0.262 ± 0.02b | 0.282 ± 0.01ab | 1.75 ± 0.18abcde | 0.72 ± 0.06defgh | 47.04 ± 0.879h | 51.77 ± 1.4abc |
| W50N24P144 | 0.71 ± 0.03cdef | 0.267 ± 0.02ab | 0.252 ± 0.01abcde | 1.75 ± 0.15abcde | 0.77 ± 0.06bcdefg | 43.13 ± 0.368i | 26.1 ± 2.1ghi |
| W50N24P36 | 0.74 ± 0.02cde | 0.265 ± 0.02b | 0.245 ± 0.01abcde | 1.67 ± 0.04bcde | 0.75 ± 0.02cdefgh | 43.99 ± 0.85i | 22.58 ± 1.6i |
| W80N60P90 | 0.71 ± 0.02cdef | 0.231 ± 0.02b | 0.265 ± 0.02abcd | 1.88 ± 0.15abcd | 0.9 ± 0.03abcd | 55.48 ± 0.323cde | 45.48 ± 3.6cd |
| W40N60P90 | 0.81 ± 0.02ab | 0.32 ± 0.03a | 0.235 ± 0.01abcde | 1.48 ± 0.09e | 0.58 ± 0.04h | 42.28 ± 0.339i | 27.88 ± 3.5ghi |
| W60N120P90 | 0.8 ± 0.02ab | 0.242 ± 0.03b | 0.291 ± 0.02a | 1.66 ± 0.11bcde | 0.73 ± 0.04defgh | 52.12 ± 0.974fg | 56.36 ± 1.1ab |
| W60N0P90 | 0.69 ± 0.02ef | 0.258 ± 0.02b | 0.268 ± 0.01abc | 1.58 ± 0.08cde | 0.69 ± 0.08fgh | 50.45 ± 0.431g | 24.27 ± 0.1i |
| W60N60P180 | 0.72 ± 0.02cdef | 0.247 ± 0.01b | 0.196 ± 0.01e | 1.88 ± 0.06abcd | 0.94 ± 0.09ab | 52.08 ± 1.007fg | 39.3 ± 0.4de |
| W60N60P0 | 0.76 ± 0.02bc | 0.257 ± 0.01b | 0.209 ± 0.02cde | 1.91 ± 0.15abc | 0.96 ± 0.08a | 47.4 ± 0.276h | 36.06 ± 0.5ef |
| W60N60P90 | 0.74 ± 0.01cde | 0.255 ± 0.01b | 0.214 ± 0.01cde | 1.54 ± 0.12e | 0.67 ± 0.07fgh | 59.06 ± 0.538ab | 38.05 ± 0.8ef |
| W60N60P90 | 0.73 ± 0.03cdef | 0.243 ± 0.01b | 0.226 ± 0.01bcde | 1.51 ± 0.1e | 0.64 ± 0.05gh | 57.16 ± 1.105bcd | 35.67 ± 0.8ef |
| W60N60P90 | 0.72 ± 0.02cdef | 0.236 ± 0.02b | 0.208 ± 0.01cde | 1.55 ± 0.04de | 0.7 ± 0.07efgh | 58.35 ± 0.34abc | 32.57 ± 1.2efg |
| W60N60P90 | 0.75 ± 0.03bcd | 0.259 ± 0.02b | 0.218 ± 0.01cde | 1.52 ± 0.06e | 0.66 ± 0.04fgh | 60.04 ± 0.547ab | 34.72 ± 2.3ef |
| W60N60P90 | 0.73 ± 0.03cdef | 0.261 ± 0.02b | 0.205 ± 0.01de | 1.56 ± 0.06de | 0.69 ± 0.04fgh | 55.42 ± 0.151cde | 35.45 ± 2.6ef |
| W60N60P90 | 0.74 ± 0.01cde | 0.256 ± 0.03b | 0.211 ± 0.01cde | 1.57 ± 0.11de | 0.65 ± 0.03gh | 61.22 ± 1.345a | 38.77 ± 3.1de |
Specifications of desirability for numerical optimization in central composite design.
| Name | Goal | Lower limit | Upper limit | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water (% FC) | minimize | 40 | 80 | 3 |
| Nitrogen (mg kg‒1) | minimize | 0 | 120 | 3 |
| Phosphorus (mg kg‒1) | minimize | 0 | 180 | 3 |
| Leaf dry matter content | is in range | 0.68 | 0.84 | 3 |
| Root-shoot ratio | is in range | 0.229 | 0.32 | 3 |
| Stomatal conductance | is in range | 0.196 | 0.291 | 3 |
| Chlorophyll | is in range | 1.45 | 2.07 | 3 |
| Chlorophyll | is in range | 0.58 | 0.99 | 3 |
| Membrane stability index | maximize | 42.28 | 61.22 | 3 |
| Soluble protein | maximize | 22.58 | 57.26 | 3 |
Fig. 1Representative individual leaves of E. angustifolia.
Fig. 2The effects of various regimes of W and N-P doses on (a–c) root-shoot (R/S) biomass ratio, (d–f) leaf dry matter content (LDMC), (g–i) stomatal conductance (Gs), (j–l) chlorophyll a, and (m–o) chlorophyll b in the leaves of E. angustifolia.
Fig. 3The effects of various regimes of W and N-P doses on (a–c) membrane stability index (MSI) and (d–f) soluble protein (SP) content in the leaves of E. angustifolia.
Fig. 4Pearson's correlation coefficient shows the effects of various regimes of W and N-P doses on the various growth responses of E. angustifolia.
| Subject | Agricultural and Biological Science |
| Specific subject area | Plant Physiology, Plant nutrition |
| Type of data | Table, Figure |
| How the data were acquired | The CIRAS-3 (Portable Photosynthesis System, Amesbury, MA, USA) was used to assess the stomatal conductance of |
| Data format | RawAnalyzed |
| Experimental factors | The W, N, and P were the study's independent variables, while integrated growth performance was the response variable. |
| Parameters for data collection | Coal-mined spoil was taken from the Yangchangwan coal mining site in Lingwu, Ningxia, China. Shovels were used to gather spoil samples from the surface at a depth of 50 cm, which were then consolidated, dried in the open air, crushed by hand, and sieved through a mesh of 2 mm. One-year-old similiar |
| daily to keep water content at field capacity for different water treatments, according to the weight method described by Roy et al. | |
| Description of data collection | Plant growth attributes were measured at the end of the experimental period. Gas-exchange parameters were taken on a sunny day during the hours of 8:30 am to 11:30 am |
| Data source location | Northwest A&F University, Yangling (N 34°16′, E 108°4′), Shaanxi, 712100, China. |
| Data accessibility | Repository name: MendelyData |
| Related research article | R. Roy, J. Wang, M.G. Mostafa, D. Fornara, A. Sikdar, T. Sarker, X. Wang, M. Shah, Fine-tuning of soil water and nutrient fertilizer levels for the ecological restoration of coal-mined spoils using |