| Literature DB >> 35572728 |
Saikat Mitra1, Fahadul Islam2, Rajib Das1, Humaira Urmee3, Aklima Akter2, Abubakr M Idris4,5, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker6, Mohannad A Almikhlafi7, Rohit Sharma8, Talha Bin Emran9.
Abstract
Avicennia alba is a mangrove plant that is extensively used to treat severe health issues. This focus of this study was to investigate the antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antidiarrheal activities of methanolic extract of A. alba leaves in Swiss albino mouse model. The antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antidiarrheal activities of the leaf extract were performed using alloxan-monohydrate, carrageenan-induced paw edema, acetic acid-induced writhing test and the hot plate method, and castor oil-induced method, respectively. The extract was used at doses ranging from 200 to 500 mg/kg to conduct the investigation. Leaf extract at 400 and 500 mg/kg showed potent antidiabetic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. Advanced research is needed to control blood glucose levels and carrageenan paw edema-based anti-inflammatory effects. Both tests showed statistically significant result in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum dose (500 mg/kg) demonstrated potent analgesic activity in both writhing test and hot plate method. The plant extract also showed significant antidiarrheal activity at 400 and 500 mg/kg in experimental mice. However, more research is needed to explore the possible mechanisms and isolate the compounds associated with these bioactivities from the leaf extract of A. alba.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572728 PMCID: PMC9106461 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7624189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Phytochemical screening of the leaf extract of A. alba.
| Tested groups | Methanol leaf extract |
|---|---|
| Flavonoids |
|
| Saponins |
|
| Tannins |
|
| Carbohydrates |
|
| Alkaloids |
|
| Terpenoids |
|
| Gums |
|
| Phenolics |
|
| Steroids |
|
| Glycosides | - |
(+) indicates presence; (-) indicates absence.
The effect of A. alba leaf extract on alloxan-induced diabetic mice's blood glucose levels.
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Blood glucose level (mg/dl) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 4 | Day 7 | Day 10 | Day 15 | ||
| Normal saline | 0.3 ml | 122.60 ± 3.10 | 114.20 ± 1.07 | 108.10 ± 2.48 | 106.60 ± 2.70 | 98.8 ± 3.10 |
| Diabetic control | 0.3 ml | 415 ± 4.50 | 423.15 ± 1.87 | 429.55 ± 3.10 | 438.10 ± 1.58 | 454.10 ± 3.20 |
| Glibenclamide | 10 | 394.20 ± 2.37 | 373.25 ± 2.31∗ | 339.15 ± 2.29∗ | 296.15 ± 3.06∗∗ | 265.27 ± 2.67∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 200 | 401.30 ± 2.51 | 388.25 ± 2.27 | 372.55 ± 3.40 | 361.40 ± 3.24 | 344.25 ± 3.15∗ |
| Methanol extract | 400 | 385.25 ± 3.27 | 370.35 ± 2.57 | 360.30 ± 3.34∗ | 309.90 ± 3.14∗∗ | 285.10 ± 2.96∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 500 | 387.55 ± 3.27 | 374.15 ± 3.24 | 366.45 ± 2.22 | 313.35 ± 3.27 | 291.25 ± 2.37 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, which considered significance compared with the control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test).
The effects of A. alba extract on mice's body weight.
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Body weight (g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 4 | Day 7 | Day 10 | Day 15 | ||
| Normal saline | 0.3 ml | 23.90 ± 0.27 | 25.14 ± 0.19 | 26.10 ± 0.18 | 27.20 ± 0.12 | 28.15 ± 0.21 |
| Diabetic control | 0.3 ml | 27.20 ± 0.44 | 27.80 ± 0.17 | 25.55 ± 0.40 | 25.15 ± 0.22 | 24.10 ± 0.50 |
| Glibenclamide | 10 | 29.55 ± 0.22 | 30.25 ± 0.40 | 32.15 ± 0.25∗ | 33.65 ± 0.12∗∗ | 34.45 ± 0.10∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 200 | 26.10 ± 0.25 | 26.10 ± 0.21 | 29.95 ± 0.35 | 30.85 ± 0.35 | 32.45 ± 0.20∗ |
| Methanol extract | 400 | 25.30 ± 0.15 | 26.25 ± 0.20 | 32.80 ± 0.14∗ | 32.25 ± 0.10∗ | 33.40 ± 0.45∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 500 | 26.24 ± 0.11 | 26.50 ± 0.36 | 32.95 ± 0.42∗ | 32.85 ± 0.27∗ | 33.95 ± 0.23∗∗ |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, which considered significance compared with the control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test).
Appraisal of anti-inflammatory activity of A. alba leaf extract by carrageenan-induced inflammatory method.
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Paw edema (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 hrs | 30 hrs | 60 hrs | 90 hrs | ||
| Control | 1% Tween | 7.75 | 7.25 | 7.0 | 7.07 |
| Indomethacin | 10 mg/kg | 4.29 | 4.22 | 3.75 | 3.71 |
| Methanol extract | 200 | 6.27 | 6.25 | 6.10 | 5.95 |
| Methanol extract | 400 | 5.88 | 5.77 | 5.60 | 5.50 |
| Methanol extract | 500 | 4.99 | 3.87 | 3.75 | 3.55 |
Effect of leaf extract of A. alba using acetic acid-induced abdominal writhing test.
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Writhing (mean ± SEM) | % of inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.5% methylcellulose; 10 ml/kg | 28.2 ± 0.89 | — |
| Diclofenac sodium | 10 | 8.5 ± 0.75 | 69.86∗∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 200 | 17.2 ± 0.40 | 39.01∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 400 | 12.2 ± 0.65 | 56.74∗∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 500 | 10.10 ± 9.36 | 64.18∗∗∗ |
Results are demonstrated as mean ± SEM (n = 5), ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, which considered significance compared with the control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test).
Effect of leaf extract of A. alba using hot plate test.
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Reaction time (sec) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | 120 min | ||
| Control | 1% Tween 80, 10 ml/kg | 4.07 ± 0.70 | 4.01 ± 0.37 | 4.0 ± 0.08 | 6.6 ± 0.40 | 4.15 ± 0.14 |
| Morphine | 5 | 4.10 ± 0.10 | 6.15 ± 0.16∗ | 8.50 ± 0.12∗ | 11.01 ± 0.18∗∗ | 9.60 ± 0.20∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 200 | 4.19 ± 0.13 | 4.55 ± 0.22 | 5.55 ± 0.14 | 7.24 ± 0.20∗∗ | 6.40 ± 0.15∗ |
| Methanol extract | 400 | 4.44 ± 0.25 | 4.67 ± 0.37 | 6.44 ± 0.21∗ | 8.40 ± 0.15∗∗ | 6.80 ± 0.12∗∗ |
| Methanol extract | 500 | 4.55 ± 0.86 | 5.0 ± 0.14∗ | 6.90 ± 0.20∗ | 9.10 ± 0.31∗∗ | 7.0 ± 0.13∗∗ |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, which considered significance compared with the control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test).
Effects of leaf extract of A. alba in castor oil-induced antidiarrheal test.
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Total number of feces (mean ± SEM) | % inhibition of defecation | Total number of diarrheal feces (mean ± SEM) | % inhibition of diarrhea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1% Tween 80, 10 ml/kg | 8.25 ± 0.50 | — | 5.50 ± 0.27 | — |
| Loperamide | 3 | 3.25 ± 0.23 | 60.61 | 2.25 ± 0.15 | 59.09 |
| Methanol extract | 200 | 6.10 ± 0.31 | 26.06 | 4.90 ± 0.34 | 10.91 |
| Methanol extract | 400 | 5.50 ± 0.15 | 33.33∗ | 3.80 ± 0.21 | 30.91∗ |
| Methanol extract | 500 | 4.90 ± 0.27 | 40.61∗∗ | 2.95 ± 0.19 | 46.36∗∗ |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, which considered significance compared with the control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test).