| Literature DB >> 35941980 |
Ansari Imtiyaz Ahmed Tufail Ahemad1, Qazi Majaz Ahamad Aejazuddin1, G J Khan1, Abdulrhman Alsayari2,3, Shadma Wahab2,3, Sharuk L Khan4, Noor Jahan Akter5, Md Rezaul Islam5, Arpita Roy6, Fahadul Islam5.
Abstract
Habb-e-Suranjan (HES), an Unani formulation, has been studied for its anti-inflammatory properties in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. HES is recommended for arthritis, gout, and joint pain. The current endeavor is an attempt to put it to the test and verify its efficacy scientifically. It was tested for DPPH, hydroxyl, and nitric oxide scavenging activities. It was shown that HES had the greatest TAC and FRAC values when compared to catechin and ascorbic acid. HES exhibited DPPH and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity that was dose-dependent. Incubation of sodium nitroprusside solutions in PBS at 25°C for 150 min resulted in the production of nitric oxide. Nitric oxide production was effectively decreased by HES. Anti-inflammatory medications boosted the migration of PMN cells toward the chemoattractant FMLP in an agarose experiment of PMN chemotaxis. In carrageenan-induced rat paw edema, in the HES-treated group, paw thickness was 3.021 ± 0.084 at t = 0, but it showed an increase in paw inflammation after one hour, i.e., 3.195 ± 0.082 cm which again showed a decrease in paw thickness up to 4th hour, i.e., 3.018 ± 0.078, 2.98 ± 0.032, and 2.684 ± 0.061 at t = 2, 3, and 4, respectively. It showed again getting back to the normal thickness of paw at t = 24 hrs, i.e., 3.029 ± 0.118 cm. It is concluded that the formulation is potent enough and can be used effectively for the treatment of inflammation and associated health issues. Moreover, there is much scope to evaluate its effectiveness using different in vitro and in vivo models.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35941980 PMCID: PMC9356898 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1640193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Organoleptic character.
| Sr. no. | Parameters | Observation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Size | Oval |
| 2 | Color | Light olive brown |
| 3 | Taste | Agreeable |
| 4 | Odor | Astringent |
| 5 | Appearance | Habb (pills) |
Physiochemical character.
| Sr. no. | Parameters | HES |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friability test | 0.83% |
| 2 | Hardness test | 5.5 kg/cm2 (Monsanto) |
| 3 | Weight variation | 0.112 |
| 4 | Disintegration time | 32 min |
| 5 | A pH of 1% solution | 6.5 |
| 6 | 10% solution | 5.6 |
Effect of HES on carrageenan-induced paw edema.
| Treatment | Paw thickness of rats (cm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 hr | 1 hr | 2 hr | 3 hr | 4 hr | 24 hrs | |
| Group I: normal control | 3.026 ± 0.89 | 3.026 ± 0.073 | 3.026 ± 0.082 | 3.026 ± 0.092 | 3.026 ± 0.074 | 3.026 ± 0.109 |
| Group II: carrageenan control | 3.031 ± 0.076 | 3.189 ± 0.069 | 3.392 ± 0.087 | 3.628 ± 0.093 | 3.732 ± 0.061 | 4.261 ± 0.123 |
| Group III: HES | 3.021 ± 0.084∗∗∗ | 3.195 ± 0.082∗∗∗ | 3.018 ± 0.078∗∗∗ | 2.98 ± 0.032∗∗∗ | 2.684 ± 0.061∗∗∗ | 3.029 ± 0.118∗∗∗ |
| Group IV: diclofenac sodium (standard) | 3.035 ± 0.086∗∗∗ | 3.098 ± 0.087∗∗∗ | 2.961 ± 0.069∗∗∗ | 2.92 ± 0.077∗∗∗ | 2.899 ± 0.088∗∗∗ | 3.034 ± 0.139∗∗∗ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.001 compared to control group and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 compared to carrageenan control group.
Figure 1Paw edema caused by carrageenan treatment with HES.
Figure 2Effect of HES on paw withdrawal threshold.
Effect of HES on paw withdrawal threshold.
| Treatment | Paw withdrawal threshold (g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 15 min | 30 min | 45 min | 60 min | |
| Normal control | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.02 |
| Carrageenan control | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| HES | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.02a | 0.63 ± 0.02a | 0.53 ± 0.03a | 0.50 ± 0.03a |
| Standard | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.01a | 0.85 ± 0.01a | 0.83 ± 0.01a | 0.79 ± 0.02a |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. < 0.001 compared to control group and ap < 0.001 compared to carrageenan control group.
Figure 3The impact of HES on Evans Blue dye extravasation into the rat peritoneal cavity.
Tail withdrawal reflexes elicited by the tail immersion technique in rats are affected by HES.
| Drug (dose) | Before treatment (sec) | After treatment (sec) |
|---|---|---|
| Control (saline) | 5.7 ± 0.082 | 5.8 ± 0.099 |
| HES (100 mg/kg) | 6.0 ± 0.053 | 7.3 ± 0.19a |
| Dextropropoxyphene (65 mg/kg) | 5.7 ± 0.066 | 10 ± 0.16a |
Figure 4Tail withdrawal reflexes elicited by the tail immersion technique in rats are affected by HES.
Figure 5In rats, HES has an anti-inflammatory impact on AIA.
The hematological parameters of rats treated with Freund's complete adjuvant and the effect of HES on these parameters.
| Group | WBC count (103/mm3) | RBC (× 106/ | Platelet count (105/mm3) | ESR (mm/hr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 8.7 ± 0.25 | 6.0 ± 0.15 | 2.4 ± 0.16 | 3.7 ± 0.19 |
| AIA control | 12 ± 0.31 | 4.3 ± 0.28 | 3.5 ± 0.11 | 5.6 ± 0.15 |
| HES | 10 ± 0.34b | 5.5 ± 0.18c | 2.9 ± 0.07c | 5.2 ± 0.16 |
| Standard | 9.5 ± 0.26a | 6.0 ± 0.21a | 2.5 ± 0.12a | 4.4 ± 0.09c |
Figure 6The hematological parameters of rats treated with Freund's complete adjuvant and the effect of HES on these parameters.
Absorbance HES at two different concentrations.
| Drugs | TAC | FRAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 100 | At 150 | At 100 | At 150 | |
| HES | 0.934 ± 0.098 | 1.284 ± 0.095 | 1.576 ± 0.032 | 1.874 ± 0.056 |
| CA | 1.89 ± 0.076 | 2.394 ± 0.064 | — | — |
| AA | — | — | 3.409 ± 0.065 | 3.225 ± 0.067 |
CA: catechin; AA: ascorbic acid. n = 3, mean ± SD.
Figure 7Evaluation of the DPPH radical scavenging activity of HES.
Evaluation of the DPPH radical scavenging activity of HES.
| Concentration ( | BHT | HES |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12.5 | 80 | 43 |
| 25 | 93 | 50 |
| 50 | 95 | 59 |
| 100 | 95 | 78 |
| 150 | 95 | 83 |
Figure 8Hydroxyl radical scavenging capabilities of HES and CA.
Hydroxyl radical scavenging capabilities of HES and CA.
| Concentration ( | CA | HES |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12.5 | 16 | 24 |
| 25 | 22 | 34 |
| 50 | 37 | 40 |
| 100 | 63 | 47 |
| 150 | 84 | 51 |
Figure 9Effect of HES on FMLP-induced chemotaxis of PMN cells. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ap < 0.001 when compared to the control group.
IC50 value for in vitro nitric acid scavenging activity.
| Sr. no. | Sample | Nitric oxide ( |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | HES | 41.59 ± 2.45 |
| 2 | Ascorbic acid | 186.34 ± 3.28 |