| Literature DB >> 35572434 |
Kenichi Otoshi1,2, Shinichi Kikuchi3, Kinshi Kato3, Yota Kaneko3, Ryosuke Mashiko3, Ryohei Sato3, Takahiro Igari3, Takahiro Kaga1, Shinichi Konno3.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of chronic traction apophysitis of the medial epicondyle (MEC) on medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) insufficiency in high school baseball players.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic nonhealed traction apophysitis; High school baseball player; Medial epicondyle; Medial ulnar collateral ligament Insufficiency; Retrospective cohort study
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572434 PMCID: PMC9091731 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Figure 1Ultrasonographic examination of the anteroinferior aspect of the medial epicondyle. To assess the medial aspect of the elbow, the elbow is flexed at 90°, and the forearm is placed in the supinated position. A linear transducer is placed on the medial aspect of the elbow to obtain an image that included the top of the medial epicondyle, anterior bundle of the medial ulnar collateral ligament, and sublime tubercle (A). The morphologies of the medial epicondyle are classified into four types: normal (B), irregular type (C), fragmented type (D), and hypertrophic type (E).
Figure 2Ultrasonographic examination of the humeral capitellum. To assess the humeral capitellum, the transducer is first placed on the anterolateral aspect of the elbow in the maximally extended position (A) and then moved to the posterolateral aspect of the elbow in the maximally flexed position (B). The subchondral bone is smooth in the normal capitellum (C). Capitellar OCD is diagnosed by irregularity or fragmentation of the subchondral bone of the capitellum (D). OCD, osteochondritis dissecans.
Figure 3Study flowchart.
Figure 4The prevalence of medial epicondyle (MEC) lesions. The prevalence of MEC lesions is 52.6%. Regarding morphology, the hypertrophic (HT) type has the highest prevalence at 45.8%, followed by the fragmented (FG) type at 4.9% and the irregular (IR) type at 1.8%.
The relationship between MEC lesions to elbow pain, MUCL tenderness, and positive EVST.
| MEC morphology | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (n = 1,439) | Total MEC lesion (n = 1,595) | Each type of MEC lesion | ||||
| Irregular (IR) (n = 56) | Hypertrophy (HT) (n = 1,389) | Fragmented (FG) (n = 150) | ||||
| Past history of | ||||||
| Negative | 720 (50.0%) | 491 (30.8%) | 13 (25.0%) | 447 (32.7%) | 31 (20.7%) | |
| Positive | 719 (50.0%) | 1104 (69.2%) | 42 (75.0%) | 936 (67.3%) | 119 (79.3%) | <.0001 |
| Elbow pain during | ||||||
| Negative | 950 (66.0%) | 889 (55.7%) | 27 (48.2%) | 796 (57.2%) | 68 (45.3%) | |
| Positive | 489 (34.0%) | 706 (44.3%) | 29 (51.8%) | 595 (42.8%) | 82 (54.7%) | <.0001 |
| MUCL tenderness | ||||||
| Negative | 1219 (84.7%) | 1308 (82.0%) | 40 (71.4%) | 1160 (83.4%) | 110 (73.3%) | |
| Positive | 220 (15.3%) | 287 (18.0%) | 16 (28.6%) | 231 (16.6%) | 40 (26.7%) | .0009 |
| Elbow valgus stress | ||||||
| Negative | 1330 (92.4%) | 1401 (87.8%) | 45 (80.4%) | 1242 (89.3%) | 116 (77.3%) | |
| Positive | 109 (7.6%) | 194 (12.2%) | 11 (19.6%) | 149 (10.7%) | 34 (22.7%) | <.0001 |
MEC, medial epicondyle; MUCL, medial ulnar collateral ligament; EVST, elbow valgus stress test.
Multivariate analysis for associations between MEC lesions and elbow pain, MUCL tenderness, and positive EVST.
| Each type of MEC lesion | Past history of elbow pain | Elbow pain during the previous season | MUCL tenderness | Elbow valgus stress test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | Odds ratio | 95% CI | Odds ratio | 95% CI | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
| Normal (N) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Irregular (IR) | 3.53 | 1.89-7.10 | 2.06 | 1.193-.59 | 2.31 | 1.23-4.15 | 2.81 | 1.30-5.56 |
| Hypertrophic (HT) | 2.08 | 1.78-2.45 | 1.42 | 1.21-1.66 | 1.09 | 0.89-1.35 | 1.47 | 1.12-1.93 |
| Fragmented (FG) | 3.94 | 2.58-6.23 | 2.27 | 1.59-3.26 | 2.01 | 1.33-3.00 | 3.49 | 2.19-5.45 |
Age, main playing position, and total amount of practice per week were adjusted for logistic regression analysis.
MEC, medial epicondyle; MUCL, medial ulnar collateral ligament; EVST, elbow valgus stress test.
P < .05.
The relationship between MEC lesions to age, main playing position, and total amount of practice per week.
| MEC morphology | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (n = 1439) | Total MEC lesion (n = 1595) | Each type of MEC lesion | ||||
| Irregular (IR) (n = 56) | Hypertrophy (HT) (n = 1389) | Fragmented (FG) (n = 150) | ||||
| Age | ||||||
| 15 | 365 (50.1%) | 364 (49.9%) | 16 (2.2%) | 310 (42.6%) | 37 (5.1%) | |
| 16 | 1071 (46.5%) | 1232 (53.5%) | 40 (1.7%) | 1078 (46.8%) | 113 (4.9%) | .4344 |
| 17 | 3 (75.0%) | 1 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Main playing | ||||||
| Pitcher | 291 (42.2%) | 398 (57.8%) | 12 (1.7%) | 347 (50.4%) | 39 (5.7%) | |
| Catcher | 132 (44.9%) | 162 (55.1%) | 7 (2.4%) | 133 (45.2%) | 22 (7.5%) | .0115 |
| Fielder | 1016 (49.5%) | 1035 (50.5%) | 37 (1.8%) | 909 (44.3%) | 89 (4.3%) | |
| Total amount of | ||||||
| Days | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | .2542 |
| Hours | 25.7 ± 8.1 | 27.1 ± 8.5 | 26.6 ± 8.4 | 26.9 ± 8.5 | 28.2 ± 8.4 | <.0001 |
MEC, medial epicondyle.