Literature DB >> 26535252

Elbow Injuries in Youth Baseball Players Without Prior Elbow Pain: A 1-Year Prospective Study.

Tetsuya Matsuura1, Naoto Suzue1, Shinji Kashiwaguchi2, Kokichi Arisawa3, Natsuo Yasui1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many risk factors for throwing injuries have been proposed. However, little is known about the risk factors for elbow injuries, particularly on physeal injuries in youth baseball players without prior elbow pain.
PURPOSE: To investigate the risk factors for elbow injuries with a focus on physeal injuries that could predispose youth baseball players without elbow pain to elbow injuries. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective epidemiology study.
METHODS: In 2006, 449 players without prior elbow pain were observed prospectively for 1 season to study injury incidence in relation to specific risk factors. The average age was 10.1 years (range, 7-11 years). One year later, all players were examined by administering a questionnaire, physical examination, and radiographic examination. Data for the groups with and without elbow pain were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Among the 449 participants, 30.5% reported episodes of elbow pain during the season. Of the players who reported elbow pain, 72.3% presented abnormal findings on physical examination, and of those players, 81.4% had radiographic abnormalities. Multivariate analysis showed that the age of 12 years (at 1-year examination), pitcher and catcher positions, and playing more than 100 games per year were risk factors for elbow pain.
CONCLUSION: It is expected that 30% of youth baseball players have elbow pain each year, and nearly 60% of players with elbow pain exhibit radiographic abnormalities. The age of 12 years, pitcher and catcher positions, and playing more than 100 games per year are risk factors for elbow pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  baseball; elbow; physeal injury; risk factors; youth

Year:  2013        PMID: 26535252      PMCID: PMC4555495          DOI: 10.1177/2325967113509948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med        ISSN: 2325-9671


Baseball is a sport enjoyed by millions of young athletes worldwide. Although baseball is relatively safe, numerous reports suggest a rapid rise in elbow injury rates among youth baseball players. Such injuries that become evident in high school and college are believed to begin at the youth level and are caused by cumulative recurrent microtrauma.[1,10,12] Many risk factors for throwing injuries have been proposed and include the immature skeleton, throwing mechanics, glenohumeral internal rotation deficit, pitch type, velocity, and number of throws. However, little evidence is available to support the majority of these factors. Lyman et al[10,11] followed youth baseball pitchers and found that the incidence of elbow pain increased in line with age and number of pitches per season. Harada et al[6] investigated prospectively pitchers and nonpitchers and showed that pitchers have a 4.5 times higher incidence of elbow injury than nonpitchers. However, their study included players who already had elbow pain at the beginning of the investigation. It is necessary to examine risk factors for elbow injuries in young baseball players without prior elbow pain. Furthermore, in pediatric athletes, injury patterns are influenced by the age-related stage of elbow development.[8] Physeal injuries often occur in young throwers in situations that would otherwise lead to ligamentous injuries in adult throwers.[7] The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors that could predispose youth baseball players without prior history of elbow pain to elbow injuries.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tokushima University Hospital, and all parents and coaches provided informed consent. A total of 621 players participated in the regional summer championship in July 2006. Of 621 players, 172 had a history of elbow pain. The remaining 449 players (mean age, 10.1 years; range, 7-11 years) belonged to youth baseball teams and were the subjects of this investigation. One year later, in July 2007, subjects were examined by administering a questionnaire, physical examination, and radiographic examination. None of the players in our study had thrown curveballs or sliders; all had thrown fastballs or change-ups. Questionnaires were distributed to the team coaches, and information was filled out by subjects with the assistance of coaches and/or parents. Subjects were asked whether they had experienced any episodes of elbow pain during the season. The questionnaire was also used to gather data on age, position, number of training days per week, and number of games per year. The first author (T.M.) reviewed the questionnaire with each subject to increase the players’ understanding of the questions and check the accuracy of the information. Physical examination of the elbow was recommended to players who complained of elbow pain on the questionnaire. Range of motion, tenderness, and the valgus stress test were included in the physical examination. Limitations of range of motion were regarded as positive if the difference between the throwing and nonthrowing arms was more than 5°. Radiographic examination was recommended to players who had positive findings on physical examination. Anteroposterior radiographs of the elbow in 45° of flexion and lateral were taken. Films were reviewed at the office by 2 authors (T.M. and N.S.) in a blinded fashion. We investigated the following risk factors for elbow injury: age, position, number of training days per week, and number of games per year. Data were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression models and presented as odds ratio (OR) and profile likelihood 95% confidence interval (CI) values. The likelihood-ratio test was also performed. A 2-tailed P value less than .05 was considered significant. All analysis was done in the SAS software package (version 8.2; SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Results

Figure 1 summarizes the overall results of the examination. Of the 449 subjects, 137 (30.5%) reported episodes of pain in the throwing elbow during the season. The remaining 312 subjects had no prior elbow pain.
Figure 1.

Outcomes of elbow examination.

Outcomes of elbow examination. Of the 137 players who reported elbow pain, 99 (72.3%) presented abnormal findings in the physical examination. A limitation of extension was found in 32 (23.4%) subjects, and a limitation of flexion was found in 46 (33.6%) subjects who reported elbow pain. Tenderness of the elbow was found in 65 subjects (47.4%), and the valgus stress test was positive in 44 subjects (32.1%) who reported elbow pain (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Outcomes of Physical Examination of Players With Elbow Pain

n%
Limitation of extension3223.4
Limitation of flexion4633.6
Positive tenderness6547.4
Positive valgus stress test4432.1
Outcomes of Physical Examination of Players With Elbow Pain Of the 99 subjects who presented abnormal findings on physical examination, 86 (86.9%) agreed to undergo radiography. Of them, 70 (81.4%) exhibited radiographic abnormalities: medial epicondylar fragmentation in 68 subjects, and osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in 2 subjects. Potential risk factors associated with elbow pain are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Univariate analysis showed that elbow pain was significantly associated with the age of 12 years (P < .001), pitchers (P < .0001), catchers (P < .001), infielders (P = .05), and playing more than 100 games per year (P < .01) (Table 2). The number of practice days per week was not significantly associated with elbow pain. Multivariate analysis of these 5 variables showed that age of 12 years (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.04-3.63), pitcher (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 2.16-9.03), catcher (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.62-9.06), and more than 100 games per year (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.30-5.49) were risk factors significantly associated with elbow pain (Table 3). The infielder position was not significantly associated with elbow pain.
TABLE 2

Univariate Analysis of the Risk Factors for Elbow Pain

Variablen (%)Odds Ratio95% Confidence Interval P Value
Age, y
 ≤1099 (22.0)1.00
 11152 (33.9)1.831.00-3.47.06
 12198 (44.1)2.741.55-5.05<.001
Position
 Pitcher149 (33.2)5.172.68-10.71<.0001
 Catcher51 (11.4)4.552.03-10.65<.001
 Infielder159 (35.4)2.041.03-4.30.05
 Outfielder90 (20.0)1.00
Training days per week
 ≤385 (18.9)1.00
 4-5294 (65.5)1.460.85-2.60.19
 6-770 (15.6)1.920.96-3.89.07
No. of games per year
 ≤5064 (14.2)1.00
 50-69150 (33.4)0.850.43-1.75.65
 70-99113 (25.2)1.590.80-3.27.19
 ≥100122 (27.2)2.591.34-5.25<.01
TABLE 3

Multivariate Analysis of the Risk Factors for Elbow Pain

VariableOdds Ratio95% Confidence Interval P Value
Age, y
 ≤101.00
 111.290.68-2.53.44
 121.911.04-3.63.04
Position
 Pitcher4.272.16-9.03<.0001
 Catcher3.761.62-9.06<.01
 Infielder1.850.91-3.95.10
 Outfielder1.00
Training days per week
 ≤31.00
 4-51.330.74-2.46.36
 6-71.620.78-3.43.20
No. of games per year
 <501.00
 50-690.950.46-2.01.89
 70-991.440.70-3.06.33
 ≥1002.621.30-5.49<.01
Univariate Analysis of the Risk Factors for Elbow Pain Multivariate Analysis of the Risk Factors for Elbow Pain

Discussion

A total of 30.5% of youth baseball players had elbow pain. Of them, 72.3% were positive on physical examination. Furthermore, 81.4% of subjects who were positive on physical examination showed radiographic abnormalities. On the basis of these results, it is expected that approximately 30% of youth baseball players with no history of elbow pain will experience elbow pain, and that nearly 60% (72% of 81%) of players with elbow pain will show radiographic abnormalities. To our knowledge, no other surveys of this nature have been performed among youth baseball players. The immature skeleton of a young player responds differently to the stresses of throwing than a mature skeleton. One hypothesis focuses on the secondary ossification centers.[14] At the elbow, 6 ossification centers appear between the age of 2 and 11 years. The epiphysis and apophyses close slowly by ossification as the elbow becomes skeletally more mature, and ossification is complete by the mid-teen years in most children.[2] It is possible for as many as 6 secondary ossification centers to be present in the elbows of 11- to 12-year-old boys. These centers are the most vulnerable points in the young elbow and can become inflamed and irritated by the throwing motion. In a study of 49 adolescent pitchers, Torg and Moyer[15] found that 70% of players had soreness when pitching, but only 2 subjects presented with significant abnormal roentgenological findings. Larson et al,[9] in their study of 120 Little League pitchers, found medial epicondylar changes in 23% of subjects. Furthermore, Hang et al[5] found that separation or fragmentation of the medial epicondyle was present in 76% of Little Leaguers. The finding that nearly 60% of players with elbow pain in the present study exhibited radiographic abnormalities is consistent with this hypothesis. Elbow injuries result from cumulative microtrauma from the repetitive, dynamic, overhead motion used in throwing.[1,3] The slow development of these injuries makes it difficult to demonstrate cause and effect. A general perception has been that elbow injury occurs because of musculoskeletal intrinsic factors, such as the skeletal immaturity of this group and weak muscles around the elbow. Extrinsic factors, such as the level of competition, intensity of play, duration, and frequency of play, as well as the biomechanical and physiological demands of throwing, also affect the durability of young players and may increase the risk of injury.[11,13] Multivariable logistic regression revealed that elbow pain was associated with age of 12 years (age of subjects taken at 1-year examination), pitcher, catcher, and more than 100 games per year. The risk factor with the strongest association to injury was pitcher. Previous studies have confirmed that pitching is a strong risk factor for elbow pain.[4,6,9] A topic of significant debate is the influence of pitch type. None of the players in our study had thrown curveballs or sliders; all had thrown fastballs or change-ups. Lyman et al[10,11] showed that the use of fastball or change-up pitches is associated with a reduced risk of elbow pain, whereas the use of curveballs or sliders is associated with an increase in such risk. In our study, catching was found to be a risk factor for elbow pain. Hang et al[5] demonstrated comparatively high rates of elbow pain in youth catchers in their retrospective study, which might be explained by the fact that the number of throws made by a catcher is probably as high as that of pitchers and more than fielders. The association with age has been well established. Older players consistently have higher rates of elbow pain than younger players.[3,4] Because this increase was found for 2 to 3 years between the ages of 9 and 12 years, it may have important implications. The finding that the 12-year-olds in this study had higher rates of elbow pain than those who were 10 years old or younger supports this hypothesis. Those who played more than 100 games per year had a notably increased risk of injury. It is not uncommon for youth players to play 70 games or more per year as the climate of the study region is warm and allows year-round baseball activity. With increasing demand on youth athletes to play more, there is less time for repair of bony and soft tissues in the elbow. We found no association between the number of practice days per week and elbow pain, although the number of hours per week was not analyzed. Harada et al[6] showed that 14 or more hours of training per week tended to be associated with elbow injuries. This prospective study identified multiple risk factors for throwing injuries in youth baseball players and provides new information by adding to the available data. However, the study has several limitations. One major limitation is that our figures are based on the participants’ recall of practice sessions. Duration, severity, and consequences of elbow pain were not evaluated. Another disadvantage is that only children with elbow pain were evaluated clinically, and that only children with abnormal physical examination were evaluated by radiographic examination. No radiographic examinations were done for children without symptoms to serve as a control group. All players were from 1 geographic region. It is unknown whether the association between risk factors and injury are different in other countries. Finally, we did not study other potential risk factors, such as pitching mechanics and physical conditioning.

Conclusion

It is expected that 30% of youth baseball players will have elbow pain each year, and that nearly 60% of players with elbow pain will show radiographic abnormalities. Age of 12 years, playing pitcher or catcher, and playing more than 100 games per year are risk factors for elbow pain.
  14 in total

1.  A clinical and roentgenographic study of Little League elbow.

Authors:  David Wei Hang; Chien Ming Chao; Yi-Shiong Hang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Little League survey: the Eugene study.

Authors:  R L Larson; K M Singer; R Bergstrom; S Thomas
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Risk factors for elbow injuries among young baseball players.

Authors:  Mikio Harada; Masatoshi Takahara; Nariyuki Mura; Junya Sasaki; Tomokazu Ito; Toshihiko Ogino
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Preventing throwing injuries.

Authors:  J R Andrews; G S Fleisig
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Longitudinal study of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers.

Authors:  S Lyman; G S Fleisig; J W Waterbor; E M Funkhouser; L Pulley; J R Andrews; E D Osinski; J M Roseman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Non-union of a stress fracture through the olecranon epiphyseal plate observed in an adolescent baseball pitcher. A case report.

Authors:  J S Torg; R A Moyer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Elbow problems associated with baseball during childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  A M Pappas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Pitcher's elbow in adolescents.

Authors:  W A Grana; A Rashkin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Glenn S Fleisig; James R Andrews; E David Osinski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Little League survey: the Houston study.

Authors:  J J Gugenheim; R F Stanley; G W Woods; H S Tullos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  19 in total

1.  Change in MRI findings of medial collateral ligament injury in adolescent baseball players with no clinical symptoms over time.

Authors:  Takeshi Makihara; Yoshikazu Okamoto; Tomohiro Yoshizawa; Kenta Tanaka; Takeshi Ogawa; Manabu Minami; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Clinical interpretation of asymptomatic medial collateral ligament injury observed on magnetic resonance imaging in adolescent baseball players.

Authors:  Kenta Tanaka; Yoshikazu Okamoto; Takeshi Makihara; Kiyoshi Maehara; Tomohiro Yoshizawa; Manabu Minami; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Normal imaging laterality on magnetic resonance imaging of the medial epicondyle of the elbow on the dominant side of adolescent male baseball players.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yoshizawa; Yoshikazu Okamoto; Kenta Tanaka; Takeshi Makihara; Tomoko Tonoe; Manabu Minami; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Epiphyseal injury of the lateral condyle related to throwing in a young baseball player: a report of a rare case.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Tajika; Tetsuya Shinozaki; Mikihiko Takata; Yuhei Hatori; Junki Suzuki; Takuro Kuboi; Hirotaka Chikuda
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-04

5.  Pitch count adherence and injury assessment of youth baseball in South Carolina.

Authors:  Josef K Eichinger; J Brett Goodloe; Jackie J Lin; Alyssa Greenhouse; Meghana V Rao; Richard J Friedman; James R Roberts
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-05

6.  Incidence and risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders of the elbow in baseball pitchers: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Chris Grant; Taylor Tuff; Melissa Corso; James J Young; Paula J Stern; Elie Côté; Pierre Côté
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2020-12

7.  Association Between Parental Understanding of Pitch Smart Guidelines and Youth Baseball Player Injuries.

Authors:  Luke Zabawa; Jeremy A Alland
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-20

8.  Biomechanical Differences Between Japanese and American Professional Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Takanori Oi; Shinichi Yoshiya; Jon Slowik; Alek Diffendaffer; Yohei Takagi; Hiroshi Tanaka; Katsuya Nobuhara; Glenn S Fleisig
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-19

9.  A Preseason Checklist for Predicting Elbow Injury in Little League Baseball Players.

Authors:  Taiki Yukutake; Masumi Kuwata; Minoru Yamada; Tomoki Aoyama
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-01-13

10.  Primary Repair of Proximal Ulnar Collateral Ligament Ruptures in Pediatric Overhead Athletes.

Authors:  Lafi S Khalil; Austin G Cross; Felix H Savoie; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.