Literature DB >> 35572381

Automatic plane adjustment of orthopedic intraoperative flat panel detector CT-volumes.

Celia Martín Vicario1, Florian Kordon1,2,3, Felix Denzinger1,3, Jan Siad El Barbari4, Maxim Privalov4, Jochen Franke4, Sarina Thomas5, Lisa Kausch5, Andreas Maier1, Holger Kunze1,3.   

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the result in orthopedic trauma surgery, usually three-dimensional volume data of the treated region is acquired. With mobile C-arm systems, these acquisitions can be performed intraoperatively, reducing the number of required revision surgeries. However, the acquired volumes are typically not aligned to the anatomical regions. Thus, the multiplanar reconstructed (MPR) planes need to be adjusted manually during the review of the volume. To speed up and ease the workflow, an automatic parameterization of these planes is needed. Approach: We present a detailed study of multitask learning (MTL) regression networks to estimate the parameters of the MPR planes. First, various mathematical descriptions for rotation, including Euler angle, quaternion, and matrix representation, are revised. Then, two different MTL network architectures based on the PoseNet are compared with a single task learning network.
Results: Using a matrix description rather than the Euler angle description, the accuracy of the regressed normals improves from 7.7 deg to 7.3 deg in the mean value for single anatomies. The multihead approach improves the regression of the plane position from 7.4 to 6.1 mm, whereas the orientation does not benefit from this approach. Thus, the achieved accuracy meets the reported interrater variance in similarly complex body regions of up to 6.3 deg for the normals and up to 9.3 mm for the plane position. Conclusions: The use of a multihead approach with shared features leads to more accurate plane regression compared with the use of individual networks for each task. It also improves the angle estimation for the ankle region. The reported results are in the same range as manual plane adjustments. The use of a combined network with shared parameters requires less memory, which is a great benefit for the implementation of an application for the surgical environment.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flat panel CT; multiplanar reconstruction; orthopedics; plane regression

Year:  2022        PMID: 35572381      PMCID: PMC9084606          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.034001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  14 in total

1.  Ω-Net (Omega-Net): Fully automatic, multi-view cardiac MR detection, orientation, and segmentation with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Davis M Vigneault; Weidi Xie; Carolyn Y Ho; David A Bluemke; J Alison Noble
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Intraoperative Imaging in Pelvic Surgery.

Authors:  Holger Keil; Sara Aytac; Paul Alfred Grützner; Jochen Franke
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 0.923

3.  Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Julia Fuchs; Sven Y Vetter; Benedict Swartman; Holger Keil; Paul-Alfred Grützner; Jochen Franke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Automatic plane adjustment of orthopedic intraoperative flat panel detector CT-volumes.

Authors:  Celia Martín Vicario; Florian Kordon; Felix Denzinger; Jan Siad El Barbari; Maxim Privalov; Jochen Franke; Sarina Thomas; Lisa Kausch; Andreas Maier; Holger Kunze
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of calcaneal fractures.

Authors:  Jochen Franke; Klaus Wendl; Arnold J Suda; Thomas Giese; Paul Alfred Grützner; Jan von Recum
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Does intraoperative fluoroscopic 3D imaging provide extra information for fracture surgery?

Authors:  B Carelsen; R Haverlag; D Th Ubbink; J S K Luitse; J C Goslings
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The use of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (ISO-C-3D) in fixation of intraarticular fractures.

Authors:  K Atesok; J Finkelstein; A Khoury; A Peyser; Y Weil; M Liebergall; R Mosheiff
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of acute unstable syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  Jochen Franke; Jan von Recum; Arnold J Suda; Paul Alfred Grützner; Klaus Wendl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Toward automatic C-arm positioning for standard projections in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Lisa Kausch; Sarina Thomas; Holger Kunze; Maxim Privalov; Sven Vetter; Jochen Franke; Andreas H Mahnken; Lena Maier-Hein; Klaus Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging in Calcaneal Fracture Treatment.

Authors:  Heui-Chul Gwak; Jeon-Gyo Kim; Jung-Han Kim; Sang-Myung Roh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-11-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Automatic plane adjustment of orthopedic intraoperative flat panel detector CT-volumes.

Authors:  Celia Martín Vicario; Florian Kordon; Felix Denzinger; Jan Siad El Barbari; Maxim Privalov; Jochen Franke; Sarina Thomas; Lisa Kausch; Andreas Maier; Holger Kunze
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.