| Literature DB >> 35572347 |
Abstract
Microorganisms have been able to colonize and thrive in extreme environments characterized by low/high pH, temperature, salt, or pressure. Examples of extreme environments are soda lakes and soda deserts. The objective of this study was to explore the fungal diversity across soda lakes Magadi, Elmenteita, Sonachi, and Bogoria in Kenya. A new set of PCR primers was designed to amplify a fragment long enough for the 454-pyrosequencing technology. Analysis of the amplicons generated showed that the new primers amplified for diverse fungal groups. A total of 153,634 quality-filtered, nonchimeric sequences derived from the 18S region of the rRNA region were used for community diversity analysis. The sequence reads were clustered into 502 OTUs at 97% similarity cut-off using BLASTn analysis of which 432 were affiliated to known fungal phylotypes and the rest to other eukaryotes. Fungal OTUs were distributed across 107 genera affiliated to the phyla Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Glomeromycota, and and other unclassified groups refred to as Incertae sedis. The phylum Ascomycota was the most abundant in terms of OTUs. Overall, fifteen genera (Chaetomium, Monodictys, Arthrinium, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Myrothecium, Phyllosticta, Coniochaeta, Diatrype, Sarocladium, Sclerotinia, Aspergillus, Preussia, and Eutypa) accounted for 65.3% of all the reads. The genus Cladosporium was detected across all the samples at varying percentages with the highest being water from Lake Bogoria (51.4%). Good's coverage estimator values ranged between 97 and 100%, an indication that the dominant phylotypes were represented in the data. These results provide useful insights that can guide cultivation-dependent studies to understand the physiology and biochemistry of the as-yet uncultured taxa.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572347 PMCID: PMC9098348 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9182034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scientifica (Cairo) ISSN: 2090-908X
Summary description of the 33 samples investigated and their diversity indices.
| Sample ID | Lake | Sample type | pH | Temp. (°C) | Total no. of sequences | Fungal sequences | % of fungal sequences | Total no. of OTUs | Fungal OTUs | Chao1 | Good's coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDS | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 34 | 2,340 | 2,320 | 99.15 | 47 | 47 | 41.75 | 0.99 |
| BGS | Bogoria | Grassland_soil | 7.6 | 24 | 661 | 658 | 99.55 | 26 | 22 | 24.00 | 1.00 |
| BMM | Bogoria | Mats | 7.6 | 72 | 1,073 | 1,073 | 100.00 | 21 | 21 | 22.60 | 0.99 |
| BW1 | Bogoria | Water | 7.6 | 88 | 3,401 | 3,394 | 99.79 | 39 | 30 | 34.00 | 0.98 |
| BW2 | Bogoria | Water | 10.1 | 28 | 1,467 | 1,446 | 98.57 | 34 | 28 | 28.00 | 0.99 |
| BWS1 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 24.3 | 736 | 735 | 99.86 | 20 | 17 | 17.00 | 1.00 |
| BWS2 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 27 | 1,103 | 1,093 | 99.09 | 21 | 18 | 18.00 | 1.00 |
| BWS3 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 30.6 | 747 | 747 | 100.00 | 15 | 15 | 15.00 | 1.00 |
| BWS4 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 42.6 | 1,612 | 1,601 | 99.32 | 34 | 32 | 30.00 | 0.99 |
| BWS5 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 55.8 | 764 | 756 | 98.95 | 23 | 19 | 20.00 | 1.00 |
| BWS6 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 68.1 | 1,032 | 1,029 | 99.71 | 23 | 20 | 19.25 | 1.00 |
| BWS8 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 76.1 | 2,637 | 2,592 | 98.29 | 41 | 37 | 39.50 | 0.99 |
| BWS9 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 44.6 | 2,067 | 2,052 | 99.27 | 30 | 28 | 36.00 | 0.98 |
| BWS10 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 7.6 | 35.8 | 596 | 595 | 99.83 | 14 | 13 | 13.00 | 1.00 |
| BWS12 | Bogoria | Wet_sediments | 10.1 | 72 | 3369 | 3,338 | 99.08 | 47 | 39 | 36.00 | 0.99 |
| EDS | Elmenteita | Dry_sediments | 9.9 | 24 | 18,264 | 18,108 | 99.15 | 78 | 60 | 52.43 | 0.98 |
| EGS | Elmenteita | Grassland_soil | 9.9 | 24 | 8,177 | 8,148 | 99.65 | 62 | 59 | 64.00 | 0.97 |
| EM | Elmenteita | Mats | 9.9 | 65 | 6,745 | 6,732 | 99.81 | 65 | 58 | 48.43 | 0.98 |
| EW1 | Elmenteita | Water | 9.9 | 65 | 12,992 | 12,881 | 99.15 | 52 | 46 | 38.75 | 0.99 |
| EW2 | Elmenteita | Water | 8.7 | 24 | 6,776 | 6,746 | 99.56 | 58 | 45 | 45.25 | 0.98 |
| EWS | Elmenteita | Wet_sediments | 9.9 | 22.7 | 15,612 | 15,598 | 99.91 | 68 | 40 | 46.00 | 0.98 |
| MBR | Magadi | Brine | 10.3 | 37.4 | 9,988 | 9,928 | 99.40 | 51 | 47 | 37.88 | 0.99 |
| MM1 | Magadi | Mats | 9.4 | 44.9 | 522 | 520 | 99.62 | 27 | 23 | 26.17 | 1.00 |
| MSC | Magadi | Salt_Crust | 10.3 | 47.2 | 1,181 | 1,174 | 99.41 | 40 | 34 | 39.00 | 0.99 |
| MWS1 | Magadi | Wet_sediments | 9.4 | 44.9 | 1,062 | 1,052 | 99.06 | 40 | 39 | 38.60 | 0.99 |
| MWS2 | Magadi | Wet_sediments | 9.4 | 44.9 | 585 | 582 | 99.49 | 28 | 26 | 27.25 | 1.00 |
| MWS3 | Magadi | Wet_sediments | 8.5 | 38 | 12,121 | 12,121 | 100.00 | 39 | 39 | 33.50 | 0.99 |
| MWS4 | Magadi | Wet_sediments | 9.4 | 85 | 11,499 | 11,481 | 99.84 | 73 | 64 | 62.00 | 0.97 |
| SDS | Sonachi | Wet_sediments | 9.9 | 26.9 | 1,561 | 1,538 | 98.53 | 81 | 68 | 66.59 | 0.97 |
| SGS | Sonachi | Grassland_soil | 9.9 | 26.9 | 7,608 | 7,571 | 99.51 | 72 | 63 | 56.11 | 0.97 |
| SW | Sonachi | Water | 9.9 | 26.9 | 5,400 | 5,370 | 99.44 | 59 | 48 | 39.14 | 0.99 |
| SWS | Sonachi | Dry_sediments | 9.9 | 26.9 | 9,936 | 9,855 | 99.18 | 52 | 43 | 39.50 | 0.98 |
The samples are sorted by study site. BW, EW, and SW denote water samples from Bogoria, Elmenteita, and Sonachi, respectively; BWS, EWS, MWS, and SWS denote wet sediment samples from Bogoria, Elmenteita, Magadi, and Sonachi, respectively; EDS and SDS denote dry sediments from Elmenteita and Sonachi, respectively; BM and EM denote microbial mats from Bogoria and Elmenteita, respectively, while MBR and MSC denote brine and salt crust from Magadi; BGS, EGS, and SGS denote grassland soils from Bogoria, Elmenteita, and Sonachi, respectively.
Figure 1Distribution of OTUs at the class level across the 33 samples analyzed in this study. BW, EW, and SW denote water samples from Bogoria, Elmenteita, and Sonachi, respectively; BWS, EWS, MWS, and SWS denote wet sediment samples from Bogoria, Elmenteita, Magadi, and Sonachi, respectively; EDS and SDS denote dry sediments from Elmenteita and Sonachi, respectively; BM and EM denote microbial mats from Bogoria and Elmenteita, respectively, while MBR and MSC denote brine and salt crust from Magadi; BGS, EGS, and SGS denote grassland soils from Bogoria, Elmenteita, and Sonachi, respectively.
Figure 2(a) Percentage read abundance of the top 20 species across the samples. (b) Heatmap showing the % abundance of the top 30 phylotypes.
Figure 3Alpha diversity indices across the samples based on richness, Simpson, Shannon, evenness, and Fisher.
Figure 4Bray–Curtis dissimilarity analysis showing the clustering of the samples.