Literature DB >> 35569077

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Nodal Response Rates in Luminal Breast Cancer: Effects of Age and Tumor Ki67.

Judy C Boughey1, Tanya L Hoskin2, Matthew P Goetz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is standard for most triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ breast cancers, and frequently downstages node-positive (cN+) disease, permitting omission of axillary dissection. In estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2- disease, response rates are lower. Whether Ki67 is associated with axillary downstaging in ER+/HER2- disease is unknown.
METHODS: With institutional review board approval, we queried our institutional database to identify all patients with primary ER+/HER2- biopsy-proven cN+ breast cancer treated with NAC followed by surgery from January 2012 to December 2021. Nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were evaluated by pretreatment Ki67 and patient age.
RESULTS: 315 patients (median age 50 years) were included. Nodal pCR rate was 24.8% (78/315) and was higher in patients aged < 50 years than ≥ 50 years (31.8% versus 17.7%, p = 0.004). Ki67 was available on 236 patients (74.9%). Median Ki67 was 29.0% (range 1-98%) and did not differ by age category (p = 0.23). Patients with nodal pCR had higher Ki67 (median 40.3% versus 25.0%, p < 0.001). Nodal pCR rates were 28.4% (Ki67 ≥ 20%) versus 8.1% (Ki67 < 20%) (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, Ki67 and age category were predictive of nodal pCR. Combining these two parameters together, nodal pCR rates in age < 50 years were 35.8% when Ki67 ≥ 20% versus 14.3% with Ki67 < 20% (p = 0.02). In contrast, for age ≥ 50 years, nodal pCR was 21.0% for Ki67 ≥ 20% versus 2.6% with Ki67 < 20% (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: In ER+/HER2- breast cancer, nodal downstaging with NAC is associated with age (< 50 years) and Ki67 (≥ 20%). Age and Ki67 should be considered for NAC decision-making and can identify patients with high rates of nodal downstaging (36%) who would benefit from NAC to enable axillary preservation.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35569077      PMCID: PMC9466990          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11871-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  15 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Breast Cancer is Greatest in Excellent Responders: Triple-Negative and HER2+ Subtypes.

Authors:  Brittany L Murphy; Courtney N Day; Tanya L Hoskin; Elizabeth B Habermann; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Ki-67 labeling index as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Parveen Jain; Dinesh Chandra Doval; Ullas Batra; Pankaj Goyal; Sneha Jatan Bothra; Chaturbhuj Agarwal; Dutta Kumardeep Choudhary; Abhishek Yadav; Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyalla; Mansi Sharma; Prashanta Dash; Vineet Talwar
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.

Authors:  N Wolmark; J Wang; E Mamounas; J Bryant; B Fisher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2001

4.  21-Gene Assay to Inform Chemotherapy Benefit in Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kevin Kalinsky; William E Barlow; Julie R Gralow; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Nancy U Lin; Edith A Perez; Lori J Goldstein; Stephen K L Chia; Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind; Priya Rastogi; Emilio Alba; Suzette Delaloge; Miguel Martin; Catherine M Kelly; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Miguel Gil-Gil; Claudia H Arce-Salinas; Etienne G C Brain; Eun-Sook Lee; Jean-Yves Pierga; Begoña Bermejo; Manuel Ramos-Vazquez; Kyung-Hae Jung; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Anne F Schott; Steven Shak; Priyanka Sharma; Danika L Lew; Jieling Miao; Debasish Tripathy; Lajos Pusztai; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Tumor biology correlates with rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Linda M McCall; Karla V Ballman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Teresa Flippo-Morton; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The Optimal Treatment Plan to Avoid Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Differs by Surgical Strategy and Tumor Subtype.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Emily C Zabor; Anita Mamtani; Andrea V Barrio; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Mark R Somerfield; Lisa A Carey; Jennie R Crews; Neelima Denduluri; E Shelley Hwang; Seema A Khan; Sibylle Loibl; Elizabeth A Morris; Alejandra Perez; Meredith M Regan; Patricia A Spears; Preeti K Sudheendra; W Fraser Symmans; Rachel L Yung; Brittany E Harvey; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients.

Authors:  Christina Yau; Marie Osdoit; Marieke van der Noordaa; Sonal Shad; Jane Wei; Diane de Croze; Anne-Sophie Hamy; Marick Laé; Fabien Reyal; Gabe S Sonke; Tessa G Steenbruggen; Maartje van Seijen; Jelle Wesseling; Miguel Martín; Maria Del Monte-Millán; Sara López-Tarruella; Judy C Boughey; Matthew P Goetz; Tanya Hoskin; Rebekah Gould; Vicente Valero; Stephen B Edge; Jean E Abraham; John M S Bartlett; Carlos Caldas; Janet Dunn; Helena Earl; Larry Hayward; Louise Hiller; Elena Provenzano; Stephen-John Sammut; Jeremy S Thomas; David Cameron; Ashley Graham; Peter Hall; Lorna Mackintosh; Fang Fan; Andrew K Godwin; Kelsey Schwensen; Priyanka Sharma; Angela M DeMichele; Kimberly Cole; Lajos Pusztai; Mi-Ok Kim; Laura J van 't Veer; Laura J Esserman; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 54.433

10.  Ki-67 as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Kwan Il Kim; Kyung Hee Lee; Tae Ryung Kim; Yong Soon Chun; Tae Hoon Lee; Heung Kyu Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.