| Literature DB >> 35568912 |
Qianlin Li1,2,3, Fuqiang Zhang4, Yi Lu5, Huan Hu1,2,3, Jin Wang1,2,3, Cheng Guo6, Qiang Deng1,2,3, Conghui Liao1,2,3, Qin Wu1,2,3, Tingsong Hu7, Zeliang Chen8,9,10, Jiahai Lu11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a re-emerged mosquito-borne alphavirus that can cause musculoskeletal diseases, imposing a substantial threat to public health globally. High-affinity antibodies are need for diagnosis and treatment of CHIKV infections. As a potential diagnostic and therapeutic agent, the multivalent VHH antibodies is a promising tookit in nanomedicine. Here, we developed potent multivalent VHH antibodies from an alpaca naïve phage display library targeting the E2 glycoprotein of the CHIKV virus.Entities:
Keywords: Chikungunya; E2 glycoprotein; Epitope; Naïve phage display library; VHH antibody
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35568912 PMCID: PMC9107221 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01417-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 9.429
Fig. 1Screening the CHIKV E2 specific nanobodies from a VHH phage display library. a Biopanning procedure of candidate VHH domain. b Reactions from the 20 clones specifically binding with CHIKV E2 protein. c Alignment of the amino acid sequences of the isolated anti-CHIKV E2 nanobodies. d Overall similarity of VHH regions anti-CHIKV E2 nanobody sequences
Fig. 2Fabrication, characterization and binding activity detection of nanobodies. a Schematic representation of the expression vector pET-SUMO for nanobody. b Soluble prokaryotic expression and purification of recombinant nanobody using an N-terminally 6 × His- and SUMO-tagged protein (~ 28 kDa).c Binding of SUMO-tagged VHHs to immobilized CHIKV E2 (~ 40kD) or Chikungunya virion was evaluated by western blot. d Binding of SUMO-tagged VHHs to immobilized CHIKV E2 or CHIKV virus was quantified by indirect ELISA. e Particle size distribution of SUMO-tagged VHHs by NTA. f Negative-stain TEM images of SUMO-tagged VHHs, Scale bar, 50 nm
Fig. 3Biophysics of the nanobodies binding to CHIKV E2. a Binding kinetic for nanobodies were obtained by LSPR. b CHIKV E2 protein expression in infected cells was analyzed by immunofluorescence staining using Nb-2E8 and Nb-3C5. c The abilities of Nb-2E8 and Nb-3C5 to block CHIKV E2 interaction with Mxra8 were determined by a competition ELISA. d Cell binding of the nanobodies were quantified by flow cytometry. Left: representative flow cytometry plots; right: bars show mean ± S.E.M
Fig. 4Features and applications of multivalent nanobodies. a A schematic of multivalent nanobodies. b SDS-PAGE of multivalent nanobodies under non-reducing condition. c Establishment of standard curve using HRP-labeled bivalent nanobodies. d Validation of the sandwich ELISA using CHIKV-positive serum samples
Fig. 5Distribution profiles of components of E2-Nb complexes and their corresponding epitopes. a Schematic diagram of domains and positions of the CHIKV E2 Glycoprotein. b Potential binding peptides response to the Nb-2E8 and Nb-3C5 as measured by a peptide-ELISA. c Alignment of the Nb-2E8 and Nb-3C5 epitope region with E2 sequences of different genotype strains and alphaviruses. d Structure docking model of Nb-2E8 and Nb-3C5 bound to CHIKV E2 protein