| Literature DB >> 35566154 |
Agnieszka Nawirska-Olszańska1, Ewa Zaczyńska2, Anna Czarny2, Joanna Kolniak-Ostek1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify polyphenolic compounds contained in ethanol and water extracts of black alder (Alnus glutinosa L.) acorns and evaluate their anti-cancer and antimicrobial effects. The significant anti-cancer potential on the human skin epidermoid carcinoma cell line A431 and the human epithelial cell line A549 derived from lung carcinoma tissue was observed. Aqueous and ethanolic extracts of alder acorns inhibited the growth of mainly Gram-positive microorganisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus mutans) and yeast-like fungi (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata), as well as Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) strains. The identification of polyphenols was carried out using an ACQUITY UPLC-PDA-MS system. The extracts were composed of 29 compounds belonging to phenolic acids, flavonols, ellagitannins and ellagic acid derivatives. Ellagitannins were identified as the predominant phenolics in ethanol and aqueous extract (2171.90 and 1593.13 mg/100 g DM, respectively) The results may explain the use of A. glutinosa extracts in folk medicine.Entities:
Keywords: UPLC-MS; anti-cancer effect; biological properties; extraction; polyphenolic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566154 PMCID: PMC9105167 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092804
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Identification of phenolic compounds in Alder acorns a.
| Peak | Rt | λ (nm) | [M − H]−
| MS/MS | Tentative Identification | Water | Ethanol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 0.82 | 220 | 481.0628 | 300.9964/275.0187/257.0077/229.0715 | HHDP-hexoside(1-galloyl-2,3-HHDPl-α-glucose) | √ | |
| 2. | 0.92 | 324 | 355.0305 | 193.0130 | Ferulic acid hexoside | √ | |
| 3. | 1.07 | 222 | 481.0611 | 300.9986 | HHDP-hexoside | √ | |
| 4. | 1.16 | 273 | 649.0592 | 605.0702/479.0501/300.9987 | Trisgalloyl hexoside | √ | |
| 5. | 1.29 | 230 | 963.1341 | 933.0640/300.9985 | Methoxylated castalagin/vescalagin | √ | |
| 6. | 1.64 | 235/320 | 785.0615 | 633.0641/300.9984 | HHDP-digalloyl-hexoside | √ | |
| 7. | 1.71 | 274 | 783.0668 | 481.0624/300.9978 | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | √ | |
| 8. | 1.95 | 280 | 483.0761 | 271.0187/193.0340/169.0134/125.0235 | Digalloyl-glucose | √ | |
| 9. | 2.34 | 274 | 783.0645 | 633.0770/481.0583/300.9964 | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | √ | |
| 10. | 2.75 | 279 | 783.0702 | 481.0604; 300.9982 | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | √ | √ |
| 11. | 3.30 | 235 | 633.0581 | 481.9926/300.9982 | HHDP-galloyl-hexoside | √ | |
| 12. | 3.65 | 326 | 367.0090 | 191.0128 | Methyl-caffeoyl-quinate | √ | |
| 13. | 3.66 | 274 | 783.0645 | 481.0613; 300.9984 | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | √ | |
| 14. | 4.39 | 280 | 935.0596 | 783.0650; 633.0740 | Galloyl-bis-HHDP-hexoside | √ | √ |
| 15. | 4.5 | 235/320 | 785.0615 | 633.0641; 300.9984 | HHDP-digalloyl-hexoside | √ | √ |
| 16. | 4.82 | 325 | 633.0550 | 481.0470; 300.9982 | HHDP-galloyl-hexoside | √ | √ |
| 17. | 4.93 | 230 | 933.0406 | 915.0529; 633.0581; 450.9908; 301.0070 | Castalagin/vescalagin | √ | |
| 18. | 5.07 | 224 | 936.0582 | 300.9964 | Galloyl-bis-HHDP-hexoside | √ | |
| 19. | 5.32 | 279 | 783.0427 | 481.0117; 300.9964 | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | √ | √ |
| 20. | 5.51 | 235 | 933.0645 | 450.9958; 301.0000 | Castalagin/vescalagin | √ | |
| 21. | 5.68 | 246 | 1869.1495 | 934.0719; 633.0584; 468.9935; 300.9985 | Dimer of galloyl-bis-HHDP-glucose (sanguiin H-6) | √ | √ |
| 22. | 5.85 | 230 | 933.0707 | 633.0404; 300.9991 | Castalagin/vescalagin | √ | |
| 23. | 6.17 | 252/364 | 433.0420 | 301.0354 | Ellagic acid pentoside | √ | √ |
| 24. | 6.5 | 255/365 | 300.9999 | 285.0425; 257.0208; 229.0137 | Ellagic acid | √ | √ |
| 25. | 6.87 | 225 | 935.0639 | 783.0604; 300.9987 | Galloyl-bis-HHDP-hexoside | √ | |
| 26. | 7.12 | 224 | 935.0799 | 783.0650; 300.9981 | Galloyl-bis-HHDP-hexoside | √ | |
| 27. | 7.56 | 350 | 447.0560 | 315.0143 | Isorhamnetin pentoside | √ | √ |
| 28. | 7.75 | 254/362 | 461.0121 | 300.9984 | Ellagic acid hexoside | √ | |
| 29. | 8.31 | 340 | 315.0133 | Isorhamnetin | √ | √ |
a Abbreviations: Rt, retention time; HHDP, hexahydroxydiphenyl; b Experimental data.
Figure 1UPLC–MS chromatogram profile of Alder acorns (A) water and (B) ethanol extracts at 280 nm. Peak number identities are displayed in Table 1.
Phenolic composition of different extracts of Alder acorns (mg/100 g of dry matter) *.
| Peak | Compound | Water | Ethanol |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 1. | HHDP-hexoside (1-galloyl-2,3,hexahydroxydiphenoyl-α-glucose) | 43.43 ± 0.5 k | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 3. | HHDP-hexoside | 143.35 ± 4.5 d | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 4. | Trisgalloyl hexoside | 68.04 ± 1.2 i | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 5. | Methoxylated castalagin/vescalagin | 97.50 ± 2.1 g | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 6. | HHDP-digalloyl-hexoside | 173.31 ± 3.7 c | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 7. | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | 242.52 ± 5.5 a | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 8. | Digalloyl-glucose | 82.31 ± 1.1 h | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 9. | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | 103.60 ± 2.3 f | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 10. | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | 225.91 ± 3.4 a | 199.84 ± 2.4 b |
| 11. | HHDP-galloyl-hexoside | 72.26 ± 1.0 i | 0.00 ± 0.0 l |
| 13. | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | 0.00 ± 0.0 l | 173.24 ± 1.9 c |
| 14. | Galloyl-bis-HHDP-hexoside | 49.69 ± 1.2 k | 232.35 ± 2.2 a |
| 15. | HHDP-digalloyl-hexoside | 59.48 ± 1.1 j | 96.43 ± 0.8 g |
| 16. | HHDP-galloyl-hexoside | 63.44 ± 1.6 j | 105.95 ± 1.0 f |
| 17. | Castalagin/vescalagin | 0.00 ± 0.0 l | 102.70 ± 1.0 f |
| 18. | Galloyl-bis-HHDP-hexoside | 0.00 ± 0.0 l | 210.04 ± 1.6 b |
| 19. | Bis-HHDP-hexoside (pedunculagin isomer) | 108.28 ± 2.3 f | 208.00 ± 1.3 b |
| 20. | Castalagin/vescalagin | 0.00 ± 0.0 l | 215.44 ± 1.5 b |
| 21. | Dimer of galloyl-bis-HHDP-glucose (sanguiin H-6) | 59.99 ± 0.9 j | 206.01 ± 1.2 b |
| 22. | Castalagin/vescalagin | 0.00 ± 0.0 l | 183.46 ± 1.0 c |
| 25. | Galloyl-bis-HHDP-hexoside | 0.00 ± 0.0 l | 130.60 ± 0.9 e |
| 26. | Galloyl-bis-HHDP-hexoside | 0.00 ± 0.0 l | 107.83 ± 0.8 f |
| Sum | 1593.13 | 2171.90 | |
|
| |||
| 23. | Ellagic acid pentoside | 247.78 ± 10.2 d | 409.99 ± 15.6 c |
| 24. | Ellagic acid | 675.37 ± 19.7 a | 582.56 ± 13.3 b |
| 28. | Ellagic acid hexoside | 29.13 ± 0.2 e | 0.00 ± 0.0 f |
| Sum | 952.28 | 992.54 | |
|
| |||
| 2. | Ferulic acid hexoside | 68.48 ± 0.3 b | 0.00 ± 0.0 c |
| 12. | Methyl-caffeoyl-quinate | 195.09 ± 0.9 a | 0.00 ± 0.0 c |
| Sum | 263.57 | 0.00 | |
|
| |||
| 27. | Isorhamnetin pentoside | 19.80 ± 0.8 b | 53.25 ± 1.3 a |
| 29. | Isorhamnetin | 21.16 ± 0.7 b | 59.03 ± 1.5 a |
| Sum | 40.96 | 112.28 | |
| Sum of phenolic compounds | 2849.93 | 3276.72 |
* Values are means ± standard deviation. n = 3. Mean values within a row with different letters (a–l) are significantly different at p < 0.05; Amounts of phenolic acids, flavonols, ellagitannins and ellagic acid derivatives, were converted into ferulic acid (ferulic acid derivatives), caffeic acid (methyl-caffeoyl-quinate), isorhamnetin 3-O-glucoside (isorhamnetin derivatives) and ellagic acid (ellagitannins and ellagic acid derivatives).
Effect of plant extracts on growth of tumor cells lines.
| Dilution of Extract Stock Solution | The Percentage of Viability | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A431 Cells | A549 Cells | |||
| Ethanol Extract | Water Extract | Ethanol Extract | Water Extract | |
| 1:400 | 51 ± 2 f | 37 ± 2 f | 77 ± 5 f | 58 ± 1 f |
| 1:800 | 61 ± 2 f | 40 ± 1 f | 77 ± 3 f | 62 ± 1 f |
| 1:1600 | 68 ± 6 f | 38 ± 1 f | 80 ± 1 f | 67 ± 1 f |
| 1:3200 | 77 ± 2 f | 55 ± 3 f | 95 ± 1 | 71 ± 2 f |
Cells were incubated with indicated extract dilutions for 72 h, followed by determination of cells viability with MTT colorimetric method. The results are shown as percentage of cells’ viability versus control (cultures containing appropriate dilutions of the solvent; H2O or Ethanol) (mean values from three independent experiments). The percentage of viability was calculated in accordance with equation: % cell viability = [A extract/A control] × 100; where A extract—is the absorbance of the sample exposed to the extract of plants; A control—is the absorbance of the control sample—cell without extract exposition—100% cell viability. f for p < 0.05, versus Control probes.
Antibacterial and antifungal effects of water and ethanol extracts of Alder acorns.
| Bacterial or Fungal Growth Inhibition Zone (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strains | Water Extract Dilution | Ethanol Extract Dilution | ||||
| 1:1 | 1:5 | 1:10 | 1:20 | 1:40 | 1:80 | |
| 6 mm (clear zone) | 6 mm | 3 mm | 6 mm (clear zone) | 0 | 0 | |
| (21 mm opaque) | ||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 12 mm clear zone | 11 mm (opaque) | 4 mm (opaque) | 5 mm (clear zone) | 5 mm (opaque) | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 mm clear zone | 11 mm (opaque) | 0 | 5 mm (clear zone) | 4 mm (clear zone) | 0 | |
| (21 mm opaque) | ||||||
| 6 mm (opaque) | 0 | 0 | 4 mm opaque | 0 | 0 | |
| 12 mm (opaque) | 11 mm (opaque) | 4 mm (opaque) | 6 mm opaque | 5 mm (opaque) | 0 | |
| Ethanol dilution equivalent | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Effect of water extract of Alder acorns on bacteria number.
| Bacteria | CFU/mL/Time | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 24 h | ||
| Control | Extract Alder Acorns | ||
| 1.0 × 107 | 7.5 × 107 | 7.0 × 105 * | |
| 2.0 × 108 | 6.0 × 108 | 4.6 × 107 * | |
* for p < 0.05, versus Control probes (24 h).