| Literature DB >> 35565963 |
Hansel E González-Velasco1, María S Pérez-Gutiérrez2, Ángel J Alonso-Castro3, Juan R Zapata-Morales3, Perla Del C Niño-Moreno1, Nimsi Campos-Xolalpa2, Marco M González-Chávez1.
Abstract
Tagetes parryi is a plant empirically used to treat gastrointestinal and inflammatory diseases, its essential oil (EOTP) was obtained from the aerial parts, and the composition was elucidated by GC-MS. The in vivo and in vitro anti-inflammatory activities and the antinociceptive activity of EOTP and (1S)-(-)-verbenone (VERB) were assessed. The major compounds identified for EOTP were verbenone (33.39%), dihydrotagetone (26.88%), and tagetone (20.8%). EOTP and VERB diminished the ear oedema induced with TPA by 93.77 % and 81.13 %, respectively. EOTP and VERB decreased inflammation in a 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) chronic model with ED50 = 54.95 mg/kg and 45.24 mg/kg, respectively. EOTP (15 µg/mL) inhibited the in vitro production of the pro-inflammatory mediators NO (67.02%), TNF-α (69.21%), and IL-6 (58.44%) in LPS-stimulated macrophages. In the acetic induced writhing test, EOTP and VERB showed antinociceptive effects with ED50 = 84.93 mg/kg and ED50 = 45.24 mg/kg, respectively. In phase 1 of the formalin test, EOTP and VERB showed no antinociceptive effects, whereas in phase 2, EOTP (ED50 = 35.45 mg/kg) and VERB (ED50 = 24.84 mg/kg) showed antinociceptive effects. The antinociceptive actions of ETOP and VERB were blocked with the co-administration of L-NAME. This study suggests that EOTP and VERB might be used in the treatment of pain and inflammatory problems.Entities:
Keywords: Tagetes parryi; anti-inflammation; antinociceptive; essential oil; verbenone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565963 PMCID: PMC9103156 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
The chemical composition of EOTP.
| Compound | Rt (Min) | % | RIR | RIE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Hexenol-1-ol | 5.66 | 0.16 | 838 | 806.3 |
| β-Phellandrene | 10.03 | 0.34 | 964 | 957.0 |
| β-Pinene | 10.13 | 0.33 | 961.7 | 960.3 |
| β-Myrcene | 10.86 | 0.20 | 979 | 985.6 |
| α-Phellandrene | 11.40 | 0.23 | 997 | 1000.0 |
| Eucalyptol | 12.63 | 1.45 | 1023 | 1028.2 |
| 13.06 | 2.01 | 1034 | 1037.1 | |
| Dihydrotagetone | 13.87 | 26.88 | 1055 | 1054.1 |
| Chrysanthenone | 17.20 | 0.38 | 1099 | 1123 |
| Neo-allo-ocimene | 17.46 | 0.23 | 1131 | 1128.4 |
| Tagetone | 18.70 | 20.8 | 1124 | 1153 |
| Terpinene-4-ol | 19.75 | 0.13 | 1161 | 1188.5 |
| α-Terpineol | 20.42 | 0.56 | 1172 | 1188.5 |
| 2-Ethylidene-6-methyl-3,5-heptadienal | 21.22 | 0.40 | 1182 | 1205 |
| Verbenone | 22.95 | 33.39 | 1228 | 1242.4 |
| Thymol | 23.47 | 0.18 | 1266 | 1253.6 |
| Isopiperitenone | 24.32 | 2.55 | 1249 | 1271.9 |
| Eugenol | 29.96 | 1.42 | 1392 | 1393.3 |
| Caryophyllene | 31.06 | 0.31 | 1424 | 1418 |
| 33.12 | 0.16 | 1503.9 | 1474.1 | |
| Elemol | 36.61 | 0.11 | 1535 | 1551.2 |
| Total | 92.02 |
Retention time (Rt), retention indexes in the literature (RIR), and retention indexes calculated (RIE).
Anti-inflammatory activity of EOTP, and VERB, on ear oedema-induced by multiple TPA applications in mice.
| Compound/Dose | % Inhibition of Inflammation |
|---|---|
| Control | - |
| IND 8 mg/kg | 64.67 ± 2.16 *** |
| EOTP 25 mg/kg | 30.37 ± 2.41 |
| EOTP 50 mg/kg | 45.92 ± 3.26 |
| EOTP 100 mg/kg | 68.54 ± 1.92 *** |
| EOTP 200 mg/kg | 80.40 ± 3.93 *** |
| VERB 12.5 mg/kg | 36.95 ± 2.96 |
| VERB 25 mg/kg | 42.32 ± 3.84 |
| VERB 50 mg/kg | 46.16 ± 2.57 |
| VERB 100 mg/kg | 62.91 ± 3.95 *** |
The data are expressed as the means ± SEM. (n = 8). (***) represents p < 0.05 vs. IND.
Figure 1Effect of EOTP on the levels of NO, TNF-α, and IL-6 in macrophages stimulated with LPS. The results are the mean of three determinations ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. vehicle.
The antinociceptive activity of EOTP and VERB in the acetic acid-induced writhing model.
| Compound/Dose | % Inhibition of Antinociception |
|---|---|
| Control | - |
| NPX 100 mg/kg | 71.03 ± 3.30 *** |
| EOTP 10 mg/kg | 27.48 ± 7.20 |
| EOTP 50 mg/kg | 39.86 ± 4.61 |
| EOTP 100 mg/kg | 48.70 ± 8.37 |
| EOTP 200 mg/kg | 64.62 ± 2.37 *** |
| VERB 10 mg/kg | 12.76 ± 4.88 |
| VERB 50 mg/kg | 36.55 ± 3.61 |
| VERB 100 mg/kg | 56.55 ± 3.07 |
| VERB 200 mg/kg | 82.76 ± 2.18 *** |
The data are expressed as the means ± SEM. (***) represents p < 0.05, NPX vs. EOTP or VERB (n = 8).
Figure 2(a) The antinociceptive effects of EOTP in the formalin test at doses of 10, 50, 100, 200 mg/kg p.o. (b) The antinociceptive effects of VERB in the formalin test at different doses (10, 50, 100, 200 mg/kg p.o.) are shown in the formalin test’s two phases. TRD (10 mg/kg i.p.) was the negative control, whereas the vehicle was saline solution p.o. The figure shows the two phases of the formalin test. The experimental results were compared against the vehicle’s values expressed as the mean ± SEM. A significant difference (***) was determined at p < 0.05.
Figure 3The mechanism of action of the antinociceptive effects of EOTP and VERB was evaluated by a formalin pain biphasic model in the three graphics that show both phase 1 and phase 2. (a) The mechanism of action of EOTP (100 mg/kg). (b) Determination of the antinociception mechanism of action of VERB (24.8 mg/kg). Additional groups of mice received an inhibitor such as L-NAME (20 mg/kg, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase and guanylate cyclase), GLI (20 mg/kg, a K+ channel sensitive to ATP) or NAL (2 mg/kg, an antagonist of opioid receptors). The data represent two different experiments (n = 8). The results represent the mean ± SEM. (***) represents p < 0.05 compared with the control group.