| Literature DB >> 35564566 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relevance of growth determination in orthodontics is driving the search for the most precise and least invasive way of tracking the pubertal growth spurt.Entities:
Keywords: insulin-like growth factor; insulin-like growth factor binding protein; lateral cephalogram; orthodontics; salivary diagnostics; skeletal maturity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564566 PMCID: PMC9101099 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Schematic representation and examples of different cervical maturity stages. CVS: cervical vertebral staging. (a) CVS1: Flat lower borders of all the three vertebrae. Trapezoidal body of C3 and C4; (b) CVS2: Concavity present at the Lower border of C2. No change in shape of bodies of C3 and C4; (c) CVS3: Concavities present at Lower borders of both C2 and C3. C3 and C4 bodies may be either trapezoid or rectangular horizontal in shape; (d) CVS4: Concavities present at Lower borders of C2, C3, and C4. C3 and C4 bodies are rectangular horizontal in shape; (e) CVS5: Concavities present at Lower borders of C2, C3, and C4. Either one of the bodies of C3 and C4 has square shape others remain rectangular; (f) CVS4: Concavities present at the lower borders of C2, C3, and C4. At least one of the bodies of C3 and C4 attained rectangular elongated in shape and the bodies of the other cervical vertebra remain squared.
Frequency and percentage distribution of patients based on gender according to various study parameters.
| Variable | Class | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Less than 14 | 14 (32.6) | 26 (41.9) | 40 (38.1) |
| 14 to 20 | 16 (37.2) | 10 (16.2) | 26 (25.8) | |
| Greater than 20 | 13 (30.2) | 26 (41.9) | 39 (37.1) | |
| Location | Urban | 9 (20.9) | 25 (40.3) | 34 (32.4) |
| Rural | 34 (79.1) | 37 (59.7) | 71 (67.6) | |
| Family history of periodontal disease | Yes | 8 (18.6) | 12 (19.4) | 20 (19.0) |
| No | 35 (81.4) | 50 (80.6) | 85 (81.0) | |
| Frequency of brushing | Once | 29 (67.4) | 34 (54.8) | 63 (60.0) |
| Twice | 8 (18.6) | 28 (45.2) | 36 (34.3) | |
| occasionally | 6 (14.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (5.7) | |
| Previous dental visits | Once a year | 14 (32.6) | 29 (46.8) | 43 (41.0) |
| Twice a year | 6 (14.0) | 16 (25.8) | 22 (21.0) | |
| Occasionally | 15 (34.9) | 13 (21.0) | 28 (26.7) | |
| Never | 8 (18.5) | 4 (6.4) | 12 (11.3) | |
| Simplified Oral hygiene index | Good | 25 (58.1) | 39 (62.9) | 64 (61.0) |
| Fair | 11 (26.6) | 20 (32.3) | 31 (29.5) | |
| Poor | 7 (16.3) | 3 (4.8) | 10 (9.5) | |
| Bleeding on probing % of sites | No BOP | 22 (51.2) | 37 (59.7) | 59 (56.2) |
| <10% | 4 (9.3) | 6 (9.7) | 10 (9.5) | |
| 10–30% | 5 (11.6) | 9 (14.5) | 14 (13.3) | |
| >30% | 12 (27.9) | 10 (16.1) | 22 (21.0) | |
| Probing pocket depth | 1–3 mm | 33 (76.7) | 51 (82.3) | 84 (80.0) |
| 4–5 mm | 10 (23.3) | 9 (14.5) | 19 (18.1) | |
| >5 mm | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.2) | 2 (1.9) | |
| Community periodontal index (CPI) | 0 | 22 (51.2) | 36 (58.1) | 58 (55.2) |
| 1 | 6 (14.0) | 6 (9.7) | 12 (11.4) | |
| 2 | 10 (23.2) | 12 (19.4) | 22 (21.0) | |
| 3 | 5( 11.6) | 6 (9.7) | 11 (10.5) | |
| 4 | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.1) | 2 (1.9) | |
| Clinical attachment loss (CAL) | No CAL | 38 (88.4) | 54 (87.1) | 92 (87.6) |
| 1–2 mm | 5 (11.6) | 2 (3.2) | 7 (6.7) | |
| 3–4 mm | 0 (0.0) | 4 (6.5) | 4 (3.8) | |
| 5 mm and more | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.2) | 2 (1.9) | |
| Groups | Group 1 | 18 (41.9) | 17 (27.4) | 35 (33.3) |
| Group 2 | 9 (20.9) | 26 (41.9) | 35 (33.3) | |
| Group 3 | 16 (37.2) | 19 (30.7) | 35 (33.4) |
N: number, %: percentage.
Two-way ANOVA relating to main effects and interaction effects of different groups and gender on IGF-1, IGFBP3, and the IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio.
| Parameter | Effects | F |
| Partial Eta Square |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGF-1 | Group | 17.31 | <0.0005 ** | 0.26 |
| gender | 11.74 | 0.001 ** | 0.11 | |
| group * gender | 3.56 | 0.032 * | 0.07 | |
| IGFBP3 | Group | 4.32 | 0.016 * | 0.08 |
| gender | 23.37 | <0.0005 ** | 0.19 | |
| group * gender | 0.52 | 0.597 NS | 0.01 | |
| IGF-1/IGFBP3 | Group | 12.91 | <0.0005 ** | 0.21 |
| gender | 3.33 | 0.071 NS | 0.03 | |
| group * gender | 2.65 | 0.076 NS | 0.05 |
**: Highly significant (p < 0.01), *: Significant ( p < 0.05), NS: Not Significant, IGF-1: Insulin growth factor-1, IGFBP-3: Insulin growth factor binding protein-3.
Mean (SD) of IGF-1, IGFBP3, and the IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio based on groups and gender.
| IGF-1 | IGFBP3 | IGF1 /IGFBP3 Molar Ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female |
| 1 | 1.22 (0.67) | 0.85 (0.77) | 3.84 (0.20) | 3.21 (0.60) | 1.18 (0.66) | 0.96 (0.84) |
| 2 | 2.57 (0.33) | 1.57 (0.49) | 4.15 (0.30) | 3.67 (0.61) | 2.31 (0.31) | 1.62 (0.52) |
| 3 | 1.54 (0.88) | 1.47 (0.77) | 3.89 (0.34) | 3.50 (0.62) | 1.47 (0.83) | 1.60 (0.77) |
IGF-1: insulin growth factor-1, IGFBP-3: insulin growth factor binding protein-3.
Figure 2Graphical representation showing IGF-1 levels based on groups and gender.
Correlation(r) among IGF-1, IGFBP3, and the IGF-1/IGFBP3 molar ratio.
| Correlation | N | r | SE | L0.05 | U0.05 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGF-1 and IGFBP3 | 105 | 0.360 | 0.085 | 0.194 | 0.526 | <0.0005 ** |
| IGF-1 and IGF-1/IGFBP3 Molar Ratio | 105 | 0.942 | 0.011 | 0.920 | 0.964 | <0.0005 ** |
| IDFBP3 and IGF-1/IGFBP3 Molar Ratio | 105 | 0.069 | 0.097 | −0.121 | 0.259 | 0.482 NS |
**: Highly significant (p < 0.01), NS: Not Significant. r: correlation coefficient, SE: standard error from correlation coefficient, IGF-1: insulin growth factor-1, IGFBP-3: insulin growth factor binding protein-3.